Charles Woodson kind of blasts Rodgers

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

What do you think about what Charles Woodson said? Kind of illuminating considering Rodgers has said Woodson was the best he's ever played with. Rodgers has updated that over last few years saying it's Davante Adams.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

No drops.

No penalties.

No turnovers.

Minimum 25 carries. Win time of possession.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

No drops.

No penalties.

No turnovers.

Minimum 25 carries. Win time of possession.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Click play on the video so you don't look silly with your reply. This topic is about what Charles said about Aaron. Give it a listen. 😉

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

2 years ago

I agree with Woodson on this, mostly. I can sorta understand calling guys out, but at some point you have to try and pick them up too. Maybe he’s doing that behind closed doors, we don’t know.

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

Click play on the video so you don't look silly with your reply. This topic is about what Charles said about Aaron. Give it a listen. ;)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I did.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

I agree with Woodson on this, mostly. I can sorta understand calling guys out, but at some point you have to try and pick them up too. Maybe he’s doing that behind closed doors, we don’t know.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

If I gotta nitpick. I'd say I'm OK with what he says IF on the field we saw him tapping guys on shoulder encouraging them. I think this generation needs more "coddling" vs talking down to bring out the fire. I could be wrong. Aaron's there and I'm sure he knows what works and doesn't. I mean, I hope, lol.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

2 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Well so far, I don’t think he knows what works lol.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

2 years ago

We don't know what is said on the sidelines or locker room.
To make such a big deal about Rodgers shaking his head on the field, what's the big deal?
It has to be frustrating to him to put the ball in a WRs hands, only to see it dropped.
So he shows a few seconds of emotion/frustration. Would they rather have him not care?
Plus, some of the time he may be shaking his head because HE messed up.
It's easy for media or fans to judge him, when they have no clue what his actions actually mean.
Look at how many posts on this site are misunderstood because they might not be 100 percent clear what the poster meant.
Same thing with Rodgers.
JMO of course.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

I only have two problems with what Rodgers has said...

1) He said it publicly, when may e he shouldn't have (though he's claimed he hasn't said anything publicly that has hasn't said in the locker room)...

2) He's not taking his own advice... Example

Rodgers Advice: Make it simpler

Results: Short yardage plays, are all short pass plays (when players are dropping a freaking ton of passes)... where is the short yadage run game?

Everyone has said Jones and Dillons are our best weapons right now and it seems like the play callers (LaFleur and Rodgers) are what holding them back the most...

More the team struggles the more they want to pass the ball, but this wide zone system is designed to take the pressure off the QB and put more responsibilities on the RB but the play callers are doing the exact opposite of the scheme.... and no I don't think that's just Rodgers, it starts with LaFleur, but Rodgers seems to be a major factor in that as well.

Pugger
Member

2 years ago

#10

It appears MLF listened and made the offense simpler and Aaron Rodgers listened to himself and was encouraging his WRs instead of sulking. I liked what I saw on offense, especially against that defense. It is unfortunate it took this long for the coaches to realize we are now a run first team. Had we done that on day one we might be in a better position in this division.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (42m) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (1h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (7h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (9h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (15h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS