Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
Dont pick a WR in the first round; even thou we have 2 picks. We dont pick an elite WR in the F.A.
and yet all off-season I was hearing from the media outlets is how the WRs we have will be great.
I think this was most annoying - so n so was great in college or great on another team ... so therefore they will be great now.
We all know rodgers takes time to get in the rhythm with a receiver.

Ok we didnt have our starting tackles nor lazard (whom I actually really like) ... but still.

I dont blame the D; although I didnt like that we got rid of Z smith. Heck I just watched the raiders game also and they did pretty well vs the chargers with bosa and mack.

Not too bad all negative - I like Dillon and Aarons play.

(I was holding my tongue till I could actually see how rodgers and the new WRs could play) ... I hope the future games are a bit more exciting then what I just watched.

nerdmann
2 years ago
Glad Watson came back and had some legit receptions.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Dont pick a WR in the first round; even thou we have 2 picks. We dont pick an elite WR in the F.A.
and yet all off-season I was hearing from the media outlets is how the WRs we have will be great.
I think this was most annoying - so n so was great in college or great on another team ... so therefore they will be great now.
We all know rodgers takes time to get in the rhythm with a receiver.

Ok we didnt have our starting tackles nor lazard (whom I actually really like) ... but still.

I dont blame the D; although I didnt like that we got rid of Z smith. Heck I just watched the raiders game also and they did pretty well vs the chargers with bosa and mack.

Not too bad all negative - I like Dillon and Aarons play.

(I was holding my tongue till I could actually see how rodgers and the new WRs could play) ... I hope the future games are a bit more exciting then what I just watched.

Originally Posted by: Dulak 


Selecting a WR in round one guarantees nothing. If you look at some of the biggest production WR's, they were taken after round one.
What "elite" WR were available in free agency? What did they sign for and how does that fit into the Packers salary cap? The Packers did pick up Sammy Watkins so we'll have to see how he blends in with the offense.
The Packers did NOT let 3 of their 4 top WR go. Davante Adams CHOSE to play with the Raiders and his best-friend, D. Carr, even though Packers offered him MORE money than the Raiders. This was CONFIRMED by Davante himself.
The Chiefs overpaid for Marques Valdes-Scantling and if Packers matched it, we'd be bashing them for that decision.
Whomever you're thinking is the third of the top four WR has me confused. Adams, Lazard, MVS and Cobb were the top four in my mind.

If you were being told via the media that the WR's will be great, what do you have to say they won't be? You're gonna really just start bashing them over one awful showing? I follow the Packers quiet intently and the consensus I heard was the WR have great potential, but to expect growing pains. Which can be said for any rookie. I mean, expecting rookies to put up 125 yards out of the gate is absurd for us fans to demand.

Weren't reports on Z. Smith the Packers approached him with an extension that would soften his 2022 cap number and balked and they had to release him? Or we just gonna go with the Packers "got rid" of him?

Frustrating game FOR SURE, but this over reaction stuff is just exhausting. I mean. We have sixteen more games. Let's give this team a chance to rebound before we put the nails in the coffin. Although, if they lose to the Bears AT HOME, I might be jumping in on the over reaction parade!! 🤣🤣🤣
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
Really the no WR in the first round is really old... Packers traded up two 2nd round picks for a 1st round value...

Would it really make any difference if we picked Watson at #31 vs #34?

Also we didn't let MVS go, he choose to sign elsewhere...

And we didn't lose Lazard and Cobb...

I assume you mean St. Brown, but was he in the top 5? He wasn't in the top 4.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

Really the no WR in the first round is really old... Packers traded up two 2nd round picks for a 1st round value...

Would it really make any difference if we picked Watson at #31 vs #34?

Also we didn't let MVS go, he choose to sign elsewhere...

And we didn't lose Lazard and Cobb...

I assume you mean St. Brown, but was he in the top 5? He wasn't in the top 4.

Originally Posted by: beast 



ya was talking about st brown but is he better then what was shown yesterday? ... we still lost all those guys weather they wanted to sign or didnt but I would think they if we wanted a top wr we could of gotten them. We paid for our D and of course rodgers instead. I do like lazard and cobb so glad we have them.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago


Frustrating game FOR SURE, but this over reaction stuff is just exhausting. I mean. We have sixteen more games. Let's give this team a chance to rebound before we put the nails in the coffin. Although, if they lose to the Bears AT HOME, I might be jumping in on the over reaction parade!! 🤣🤣🤣

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I think its because I have spent months reading and listening too how the pack is still good with what they did at the wr position ... and I didnt buy it. I was quite worried and still am. Rodgers is stubborn when it comes to new blood and people that dont do what he thinks they should do.

Well the packers had choices of where to spend their money and they didnt spend it on Z smith (he has been my favorite pash rusher since clay matthews in his prime).

at least Mack isnt playing for the bears anymore -
nerdmann
2 years ago

I think its because I have spent months reading and listening too how the pack is still good with what they did at the wr position ... and I didnt buy it. I was quite worried and still am. Rodgers is stubborn when it comes to new blood and people that dont do what he thinks they should do.

Well the packers had choices of where to spend their money and they didnt spend it on Z smith (he has been my favorite pash rusher since clay matthews in his prime).

at least Mack isnt playing for the bears anymore -

Originally Posted by: Dulak 


Might as well have had MVS on that drop. As it is we got a discount and a kid with much more potential.

As for Davante, we dropped his cap hit, like we're gonna do when we trade Bakhtiari in the offseason.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
RickLM
2 years ago
Of the 7 (?) WRs taken before Christian Watson, 2 (!) had clearly better days. Drake London, 5 receptions for 75 yds, and Jahan Dotson, 40 yds and 2 tds. Of those two guys, barely anyone had Dotson going before Watson, and I like Watsons upside more than both.

Basically, no one has proven waiting to take Watson in the 2nd was the wrong move, and that's not even factoring in the players we got, in the first, in ADDITION to Watson.
Cheesey
2 years ago
Had Watson caught that first pass, he would have had the best first game of the WRs.
(I wish he would have caught it)
That might mentally mess him up until he can actually make a big play.
UserPostedImage
2 years ago
EQ and MVS were inconsistent at best, and not very good overall...they just weren't.

Watson could be good, although fundamentally his hand deployments was 5th grade level.. He should know by now pinkies need to be touching at the fingers when forward and diamond with fingers and thumbs when facing the QB.

Doubs (sp) looks like he could be good. I think they will be ok once Watson settles down, and Lazard is back. Cobb a good #4, anything from Rogers and Watkins a bonus. Good to see Tonyan back.

O line was the biggest issue of the game. MLF needed to run more and didn't...poor play calling. it was working and he did not stick with it.

Defense waiting a half before adjusting on Jefferson is inexcusable.
Go Packers!!!!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Rude!
beast (2h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (6h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (8h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (10h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.