Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago
Dont pick a WR in the first round; even thou we have 2 picks. We dont pick an elite WR in the F.A.
and yet all off-season I was hearing from the media outlets is how the WRs we have will be great.
I think this was most annoying - so n so was great in college or great on another team ... so therefore they will be great now.
We all know rodgers takes time to get in the rhythm with a receiver.

Ok we didnt have our starting tackles nor lazard (whom I actually really like) ... but still.

I dont blame the D; although I didnt like that we got rid of Z smith. Heck I just watched the raiders game also and they did pretty well vs the chargers with bosa and mack.

Not too bad all negative - I like Dillon and Aarons play.

(I was holding my tongue till I could actually see how rodgers and the new WRs could play) ... I hope the future games are a bit more exciting then what I just watched.

nerdmann
2 years ago
Glad Watson came back and had some legit receptions.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

Dont pick a WR in the first round; even thou we have 2 picks. We dont pick an elite WR in the F.A.
and yet all off-season I was hearing from the media outlets is how the WRs we have will be great.
I think this was most annoying - so n so was great in college or great on another team ... so therefore they will be great now.
We all know rodgers takes time to get in the rhythm with a receiver.

Ok we didnt have our starting tackles nor lazard (whom I actually really like) ... but still.

I dont blame the D; although I didnt like that we got rid of Z smith. Heck I just watched the raiders game also and they did pretty well vs the chargers with bosa and mack.

Not too bad all negative - I like Dillon and Aarons play.

(I was holding my tongue till I could actually see how rodgers and the new WRs could play) ... I hope the future games are a bit more exciting then what I just watched.

Originally Posted by: Dulak 


Selecting a WR in round one guarantees nothing. If you look at some of the biggest production WR's, they were taken after round one.
What "elite" WR were available in free agency? What did they sign for and how does that fit into the Packers salary cap? The Packers did pick up Sammy Watkins so we'll have to see how he blends in with the offense.
The Packers did NOT let 3 of their 4 top WR go. Davante Adams CHOSE to play with the Raiders and his best-friend, D. Carr, even though Packers offered him MORE money than the Raiders. This was CONFIRMED by Davante himself.
The Chiefs overpaid for Marques Valdes-Scantling and if Packers matched it, we'd be bashing them for that decision.
Whomever you're thinking is the third of the top four WR has me confused. Adams, Lazard, MVS and Cobb were the top four in my mind.

If you were being told via the media that the WR's will be great, what do you have to say they won't be? You're gonna really just start bashing them over one awful showing? I follow the Packers quiet intently and the consensus I heard was the WR have great potential, but to expect growing pains. Which can be said for any rookie. I mean, expecting rookies to put up 125 yards out of the gate is absurd for us fans to demand.

Weren't reports on Z. Smith the Packers approached him with an extension that would soften his 2022 cap number and balked and they had to release him? Or we just gonna go with the Packers "got rid" of him?

Frustrating game FOR SURE, but this over reaction stuff is just exhausting. I mean. We have sixteen more games. Let's give this team a chance to rebound before we put the nails in the coffin. Although, if they lose to the Bears AT HOME, I might be jumping in on the over reaction parade!! 🤣🤣🤣
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
Really the no WR in the first round is really old... Packers traded up two 2nd round picks for a 1st round value...

Would it really make any difference if we picked Watson at #31 vs #34?

Also we didn't let MVS go, he choose to sign elsewhere...

And we didn't lose Lazard and Cobb...

I assume you mean St. Brown, but was he in the top 5? He wasn't in the top 4.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

Really the no WR in the first round is really old... Packers traded up two 2nd round picks for a 1st round value...

Would it really make any difference if we picked Watson at #31 vs #34?

Also we didn't let MVS go, he choose to sign elsewhere...

And we didn't lose Lazard and Cobb...

I assume you mean St. Brown, but was he in the top 5? He wasn't in the top 4.

Originally Posted by: beast 



ya was talking about st brown but is he better then what was shown yesterday? ... we still lost all those guys weather they wanted to sign or didnt but I would think they if we wanted a top wr we could of gotten them. We paid for our D and of course rodgers instead. I do like lazard and cobb so glad we have them.
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
2 years ago


Frustrating game FOR SURE, but this over reaction stuff is just exhausting. I mean. We have sixteen more games. Let's give this team a chance to rebound before we put the nails in the coffin. Although, if they lose to the Bears AT HOME, I might be jumping in on the over reaction parade!! 🤣🤣🤣

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I think its because I have spent months reading and listening too how the pack is still good with what they did at the wr position ... and I didnt buy it. I was quite worried and still am. Rodgers is stubborn when it comes to new blood and people that dont do what he thinks they should do.

Well the packers had choices of where to spend their money and they didnt spend it on Z smith (he has been my favorite pash rusher since clay matthews in his prime).

at least Mack isnt playing for the bears anymore -
nerdmann
2 years ago

I think its because I have spent months reading and listening too how the pack is still good with what they did at the wr position ... and I didnt buy it. I was quite worried and still am. Rodgers is stubborn when it comes to new blood and people that dont do what he thinks they should do.

Well the packers had choices of where to spend their money and they didnt spend it on Z smith (he has been my favorite pash rusher since clay matthews in his prime).

at least Mack isnt playing for the bears anymore -

Originally Posted by: Dulak 


Might as well have had MVS on that drop. As it is we got a discount and a kid with much more potential.

As for Davante, we dropped his cap hit, like we're gonna do when we trade Bakhtiari in the offseason.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
RickLM
2 years ago
Of the 7 (?) WRs taken before Christian Watson, 2 (!) had clearly better days. Drake London, 5 receptions for 75 yds, and Jahan Dotson, 40 yds and 2 tds. Of those two guys, barely anyone had Dotson going before Watson, and I like Watsons upside more than both.

Basically, no one has proven waiting to take Watson in the 2nd was the wrong move, and that's not even factoring in the players we got, in the first, in ADDITION to Watson.
Cheesey
2 years ago
Had Watson caught that first pass, he would have had the best first game of the WRs.
(I wish he would have caught it)
That might mentally mess him up until he can actually make a big play.
UserPostedImage
2 years ago
EQ and MVS were inconsistent at best, and not very good overall...they just weren't.

Watson could be good, although fundamentally his hand deployments was 5th grade level.. He should know by now pinkies need to be touching at the fingers when forward and diamond with fingers and thumbs when facing the QB.

Doubs (sp) looks like he could be good. I think they will be ok once Watson settles down, and Lazard is back. Cobb a good #4, anything from Rogers and Watkins a bonus. Good to see Tonyan back.

O line was the biggest issue of the game. MLF needed to run more and didn't...poor play calling. it was working and he did not stick with it.

Defense waiting a half before adjusting on Jefferson is inexcusable.
Go Packers!!!!
Fan Shout
dfosterf (18m) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (1h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (2h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (2h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (4h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (19h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
48m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.