What each team is still missing, potential solutions· Page 4

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

Shouldn't there at least be a reason the posts got deleted? Lol

Originally Posted by: beast

There is if/when a Moderator soft-deletes a post. This was done by the system because they tried to delete their account so the software tried deleting all posts, and then posts that were replied to said deleted posts. It's a shit-show but thankfully takes 30 seconds to fix now.

I think the Packers are missing depth at DB...

I think OL is the huge question mark area... you can argue the Packers failures in the playoffs were due to OL injuries and not being able to cover for them... and while Packers have great potential at OL but they also have a lot of questions as well.

Originally Posted by: beast

I think the biggest question mark for me is depth at LB. It seems we have a couple studs and then a who is who behind them.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#32

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Oh? Whom tried deleting their account? PackerNation? Where they success in deleting, so they can't log back in?

I think the biggest question mark for me is depth at LB. It seems we have a couple studs and then a who is who behind them.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Same with Safety, it's Amos and Savage then who?

Basically same at CB...

ILB at least has Summers, whom has gotten on the field as a STer.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#33

Oh? Whom tried deleting their account? PackerNation? Where they success in deleting, so they can't log back in?

Same with Safety, it's Amos and Savage then who?

Basically same at CB...

ILB at least has Summers, whom has gotten on the field as a STer.

Originally Posted by: beast

Yes, that account and no they were not. I'm under the belief they were so embarrassed about being wrong about Lazard they took their balls and went home. And that is OK.

Safety is also a concern, but I also tend to focus more on the front seven. If you abuse the OL, the secondary inherently becomes or rather looks "better".

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#34

I'm under the belief they were so embarrassed about being wrong about Lazard they took their balls and went home. And that is OK.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Yup, I'm under that believe as well... which shouldn't be, but is a bit surprising to me, after coming so hard at me, for supposively having to be right and not being able to admit errors... I guess I was right, when I said I think they were just projecting there.

In no way am I perfectionist. I'm a mess in many ways lol 😥, but I do try to pay attention and be correct when I make statements. But I'm still absolutely wrong at times, but try to learn from it.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#35

Originally Posted by: beast

Eh, to each their own. It's not their first account here and I predict it won't be the last either.

Anyhow, is there any free agent safety that could be had for a decent price or we beyond that at this stage of the off-season?

Pugger
Member

2 years ago

#36

Really isn't that confusing lol.

The Packers signed Lazard(He signed it) to a 2nd round tender. He will play for the Packers for the 2022 season for 3.9 mill unless the Packers sign him to extension before the season.

He is though still a RFA and another team can offer him a contract but the Packers can match any offer or receive a 2nd round pick if it gets to that which it won't.

Got it? Kidding😋

Originally Posted by: PackerNation

It was all the conflicting reports that are confusing. lol

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#37

Anyhow, is there any free agent safety that could be had for a decent price or we beyond that at this stage of the off-season?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I think the Packers are beyond that point and are just going with what they have at this point, until claiming guys off other rosters after camp starts.

As for Safety,

Henry Black, the Packers #3 Safety from last year is still available. My guess is he's not happy with the Packers not picking up his RFA tender, but if he's not getting offers elsewhere, he still might be better than any of the backups we got.

Chris Banjo is a former Packer and career ST ace... you wouldn't prefer to start him, but he's good veteran depth and would improve a ST unit. He's spent 3 years each with Packers, Saints and Cardinals.

Landon Collins, Tashaun Gipson, Jaquiski Tartt are some other bigger names, though I think Collins is more of a S/LB tweener which I think they need more depth at true deep Safeties types.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#38

Eh, to each their own. It's not their first account here and I predict it won't be the last either.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

So who is he? Uffda_udfa? Both he and Barfarn claimed to have inside connections at Lombardi Avenue, but I've been trawling through old threads over the past few days, and I just don't think he's Barfarn. He's not as overtly and stridently political as Barfarn was. Barfarn was also capable of churning out multiple dissertations a day. It was pretty impressive.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#39

Henry Black, the Packers #3 Safety from last year is still available. My guess is he's not happy with the Packers not picking up his RFA tender, but if he's not getting offers elsewhere, he still might be better than any of the backups we got.

Originally Posted by: beast

Looks like Henry Black just signed with the Giants.

wpr
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#40

SIGH. Whatta thread. So much angst.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (18h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (22h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (22h) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (23h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (23h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (23h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (23h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (23h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (23h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (23h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (23h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (23h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22