Packers Trade Davante Adams to Raiders· Page 2

wpr
Preferred Member

2 years ago

Rob Demovsky ✔ @RobDemovsky
Per a source, the Packers we’re willing to pay Adams equally to what the Raiders are with this new deal but Adams preferred to play elsewhere.

Aaron Rodgers was aware of the developments with Adams as they unfolded in recent days.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I'm disappointed in Adams.

porky88
Veteran Member

2 years ago

#12

I'm disappointed in Adams.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Same. It’s a good haul for him, though I wish we got a player as well. Fixed the cap mess though.

http://www.row12.com/

wpr
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#13

Sports illustrated
The Packers will get two draft picks in return: The Raiders’ first-round pick at No. 22 and their second-round choice at No. 53. Along with Green Bay’s choices at No. 28 and No. 59, the Packers are slated to have four of the top 59 selections

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#14

I wonder why Adams got a hair up his butt. Do you think Rodgers’ waffling over the past couple of years alienated him? Or was he pissed that the Packers never managed to amass a real corps of talent behind him?

The man is already thirty, if I’m not mistaken, with at least three concussions on his ledger. The Raiders have a decent, but hardly elite, quarterback. Is there truly any realistic prospect that this enormous investment will pay off for them? After all, Packers receivers haven’t exactly lit up the league after leaving Green Bay. I strongly suspect the answer is no, and I think that if they draft wisely, the Packers will get the better end of this deal.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#15

Darn. I really thought he was going to be a Packer.
I'm surprised Aaron Rodgers signed here if he knew Adams was leaving

Guess we will see how Aaron Rodgers responds without his guy.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#16

I wonder why Adams got a hair up his butt. Do you think Rodgers’ waffling over the past couple of years alienated him? Or was he pissed that the Packers never managed to amass a real corps of talent behind him?

The man is already thirty, if I’m not mistaken, with at least three concussions on his ledger. The Raiders have a decent, but hardly elite, quarterback. Is there really any realistic prospect that this enormous investment will pay off for them. Packers receivers haven’t exactly lit up the league after leaving Green Bay.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Based on his press conferences, he was pissed off the Packers wouldn't recongize DeAndre Hopkins funny money contract as true $27.5 million/year. Per reports, the tag being applied to him was the end of it. Packers were willing to match, but Adams wanted to leave.

It's a win-win-win. Packers win. Raiders win. Adams wins. I love it.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#17

I’m not crazy about the front office leaking that they were willing to match the Raiders’ offer; it makes them look weak, or worse, like a jilted girl. Unless it was just a ploy to drive up his price.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#18

Guess we will see how Aaron Rodgers responds without his guy.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Maybe deep down Rodgers suspects that moving on from Adams is better for his own career longevity and, more importantly, his legacy? The offense has been arguably more successful when Adams wasn’t on the field. Rodgers helped Adams to set a number of team records. Now he can focus on spreading the ball around, implementing LaFleur’s system in its entirety, and hopefully, surmount the bogeyman that has plagued him in the playoffs over the past decade.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#19

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

If Adams is as petty as he came off in his conferences, who's to say it wasn't his agent who said it? Why do you have to assume Packers and attack them? 🤔🤔

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#20

lol

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (10m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (12m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (23m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (9h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (9h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS