Trading Love Is Right Thing To Do· Page 2

Pugger
Member

2 years ago

Another question is, will Love want to stick around for 2 years while waiting to become "the guy"?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Love is under contract for 2 more years so unless he asks for a trade or another team makes inquiries - and I can't see many teams clamoring for him - he might not have choice.

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

#12

Love is under contract for 2 more years so unless he asks for a trade or another team makes inquiries - and I can't see many teams clamoring for him - he might not have choice.

Originally Posted by: Pugger

He's still developing. If he was ready to start, it would be different. Give him another year, we'll see where he's at.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#13

He has the right to earn his paycheck and Packers have a right to write that paycheck.

He does not have a right to compete for a starting spot, unless he's in the same ballpark of talent as the starter. And if he was, Packers probably would of went with the cheaper option and the former Packers offensive coach Hackett probably would of traded for him instead of Wilson.

If Love is good enough to start, he should show that and then Packers could get quality trade value for him.

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

#14

Biggest reason to trade Love is if Aaron doesn't want him around. Lots of Articles on trading Love right now, I'm sure none of them are by Aaron Rodgers sycophants.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Pugger
Member

2 years ago

#15

Plus I want to see what Clements can do with him.

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#16

Plus I want to see what Clements can do with him.

Originally Posted by: Pugger

Yep. There is nothing wrong with having a #2 who is not an undrafted free agent. He is on a cheap rookie deal. He is not hurting the Packers at all by holding the clipboard and listening on the headset.

Pugger
Member

2 years ago

#17

He's still developing. If he was ready to start, it would be different. Give him another year, we'll see where he's at.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

If he was ready to start would we have kept Rodgers? Probably not.

Pugger
Member

2 years ago

#18

Biggest reason to trade Love is if Aaron doesn't want him around. Lots of Articles on trading Love right now, I'm sure none of them are by Aaron Rodgers sycophants.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I've never heard Rodgers publicly say anything negative about Love so its hard to say how he feels about Love as a teammate.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#19

Kenny Pickett is 23 years old
Matt Coral is 23 years old
Malik Willis is 22 years old
Sam Howell is 21 years old

Jordan Love is 23 years old AND has two years of being coached up by a winning franchise.

If you're going to spend a mid-to-late first round pick on a QB, might as well go with Love.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

You see that two years as a positive, I believe others will see that as a negative...

Two years of being coached by NFL coaches, and two years off his cheap rookie deal, and what does he have to show for it?

So far... absolutely nothing.

I think GMs would prefer the two cheap years and a fresh start over a guy with experience but hasn't developed.

That's GMs, coaches can be a completely different mindset.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (9h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (13h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (13h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (13h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (17h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (17h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (18h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (18h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (19h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (19h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (21h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (22h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (22h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (22h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (22h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (22h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (22h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (22h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (22h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (22h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (22h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS