wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
3 years ago
UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
3 years ago
From evidence in the public domain, Snyder would appear, at the very least, to be culpable in the climate of misogyny and aggressive abusive behavior toward women.

I find it strange that with all the emphasis against such behavior, that the NFL would have a halftime show which feature some complete dirtbags whose lyrics include:

"Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks" and the lovely

"Bitch, please! Now what you need to do is; Hem my coat, and roll me some dope"

not to mention the inspiring:
“All you niggas out there,
Take your guns that you using to shoot each other
And start shooting these bitchass
m-fing police.
That’ll impress a m-fing nigga like me.”

It strikes me as just a bit....ever so slight....of hypocrisy and selective rage




Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
3 years ago
I haven't read anything that's factual. It seems more culture to hate him than anything else. That said, I haven't followed it at all because I don't care for witch hunts. If you stick up for him in anyway the slacktivists come out with force saying you're guilty of everything he was accused of.

Pathetic.
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

I haven't read anything that's factual. It seems more culture to hate him than anything else. That said, I haven't followed it at all because I don't care for witch hunts. If you stick up for him in anyway the slacktivists come out with force saying you're guilty of everything he was accused of.

Pathetic.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Well, I've never been called popular in culture before... so ... thank you?

I just dislike the guy because what half decent thing has he done? There isn't much...

And yet, he's the first guy to threaten lawsuits on any and everything never written about him.

Despite of him getting rid of all his better coaches. How many teams have had franchise players refuse to resign with the team due to presidents or medical stuff currently on the team?

How many businesses have been accused of talking videos of their female employees naked, or even offering them unlimited alcohol while with sponsors?

How many owners have "volunteered" to take a "leave of absence", which some websites have claimed is actually an NFL imposed suspension... which of course, the owner once again threatened lawsuits when that was reported. Which was just more fake threats as he's refused to do it.

And now that his actions or lack of actions have gotten Congress involved, the NFL has ordered him to share some paperwork, and they have refused.

Basically, this has nothing to do with culture... but him acting like a spoiled brat that threatened lawsuits whenever someone states a negative work about him, even if it's 100% true.

And he's never been able to put together decent management to protect his own employees from other employees.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
3 years ago

Well, I've never been called popular in culture before... so ... thank you?

I just dislike the guy because what half decent thing has he done? There isn't much...

And yet, he's the first guy to threaten lawsuits on any and everything never written about him.

Despite of him getting rid of all his better coaches. How many teams have had franchise players refuse to resign with the team due to presidents or medical stuff currently on the team?

How many businesses have been accused of talking videos of their female employees naked, or even offering them unlimited alcohol while with sponsors?

How many owners have "volunteered" to take a "leave of absence", which some websites have claimed is actually an NFL imposed suspension... which of course, the owner once again threatened lawsuits when that was reported. Which was just more fake threats as he's refused to do it.

And now that his actions or lack of actions have gotten Congress involved, the NFL has ordered him to share some paperwork, and they have refused.

Basically, this has nothing to do with culture... but him acting like a spoiled brat that threatened lawsuits whenever someone states a negative work about him, even if it's 100% true.

And he's never been able to put together decent management to protect his own employees from other employees.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I haven't a clue of any of that or even if it has any truth to it. Again, I am simply saying it feels like another snowball of hate where people just continue to believe every accusation about someone because hey don't have the testicular fortitude to wait for facts. I also believe where there is smoke, there is good chance of fire. And it most certainly is "culture" as I already stated in previous post. People are weak and mindlessly pile on without doing due diligence. It's easier to hate on someone than understand. And people in general are lazy. I'm not saying you, not singling you out so not sure why you took the stance you did, but to be clear, I'm speaking in a general tone, not singular.

I couldn't give a nickel about what happens to Dan Snyder. If does go down, I hope others like him get dragged down too because I highly doubt if he did something worth getting dropped, that others haven't done the same. Clean house.
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago
I grew up in what should of been Redskins country... so I've accidentally seen and heard more stuff of his, and just absolutely nothing is good... other than maybe the Mike Shanahan staff which included Sean McVay, Kyle Shanahan and Matt LaFleur.

But everything else is pretty bad, with him consistently ruining any positive things they have...

Heck, he even ruined the name change, which many fans were disappointed for but realized it had to change, but wanted something cool.

He asked for feedback and they gave lots of feedback and he then proceeded to ignore said feedback...
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
3 years ago

I grew up in what should of been Redskins country... so I've accidentally seen and heard more stuff of his, and just absolutely nothing is good... other than maybe the Mike Shanahan staff which included Sean McVay, Kyle Shanahan and Matt LaFleur.

But everything else is pretty bad, with him consistently ruining any positive things they have...

Heck, he even ruined the name change, which many fans were disappointed for but realized it had to change, but wanted something cool.

He asked for feedback and they gave lots of feedback and he then proceeded to ignore said feedback...

Originally Posted by: beast 



Assuming this is true, why the hell keep him around? Is he like J. Edgar Hoover and has dirt on everyone in the NFL? I can't remember hearing anything positive about the guy since he bought the Redskins. I feel it was always negative. Why keep a douche like that around? It's not like the NFL will have an ownerless team for too long.
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

Assuming this is true, why the hell keep him around? Is he like J. Edgar Hoover and has dirt on everyone in the NFL? I can't remember hearing anything positive about the guy since he bought the Redskins. I feel it was always negative. Why keep a douche like that around? It's not like the NFL will have an ownerless team for too long.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Because you can't fire the owner! Otherwise the fans would have a long long time ago...

Why do other owner not force him to sell? Great question, and one can only guess, but one theory has it that owners don't like going after other owners because then they could be next, they like owners being untouchable.

Also, some owners including Jerry Jones are said to be very good friends with Dan Synder, and they back each other up on everything, and Jones has pretty big sway in the NFL world.

Plus, once again, Dan Synder is extremely sue happy, and extremely hard headed... he's not leaving without a drag out lawsuit fight, and absolutely no one wants that, as everyone comes out as a loser after that.

So Synder presents has to be so extremely bad for the other owners (not just for his team, but the other owners), that they have to be willing to knowing lose, because keeping him would clearly be an even bigger loss.


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
3 years ago

Because you can't fire the owner! Otherwise the fans would have a long long time ago...

Why do other owner not force him to sell? Great question, and one can only guess, but one theory has it that owners don't like going after other owners because then they could be next, they like owners being untouchable.

Also, some owners including Jerry Jones are said to be very good friends with Dan Synder, and they back each other up on everything, and Jones has pretty big sway in the NFL world.

Plus, once again, Dan Synder is extremely sue happy, and extremely hard headed... he's not leaving without a drag out lawsuit fight, and absolutely no one wants that, as everyone comes out as a loser after that.

So Synder presents has to be so extremely bad for the other owners (not just for his team, but the other owners), that they have to be willing to knowing lose, because keeping him would clearly be an even bigger loss.

Originally Posted by: beast 



That Carolina Panthers owner was flushed out pretty quick.
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
3 years ago

That Carolina Panthers owner was flushed out pretty quick.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Yes, but he wasn't sure happy and he went willing, after admitting his errors which included smacking employees bums.

When you have a decent person, who is willing to admit their mistakes, and accept the consequences of said mistakes, it's a lot easier.

Compared to someone whom doesn't admit the truth (can't even admit he's currently under a suspension, instead it's an "voluntary leave of absence" which has since been reported can't end until Goodell says so... and really that's a joke as whom do you think is approving the name change and other team activities? Officially it's his wife... but come on... she's had no part in the team until he's had to take a leave of absence, she's basically his middle man. And they don't accept the consequences of their actions.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
wpr (8h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.