I am not agreeing with this mentality, simply pointing it out.
When someone is accused of something without definitive proof, I think it's easy for some to try sweeping it under the rug. When you start stealing money from someone, that's black/white and easy to discern without any claim of 'he said she said'.
That being said, I think Dan Snyder is in the final year of owning an NFL franchise. The potential owners who put in bids for the Broncos might quickly be turned onto the Commanders. And hopefully, HOPEFULLY, come up with a real moniker.
Rewarding someone with billions of dollars for selling a team like this is also something that doesn't sit well with me.
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool
I would like to point out the Goodell at times has received definite proof at times, and he still attempted to sweep things under the rug...
Such as Spygate, Goodell reportedly demanded the tapes to be destroyed, before someone else leaked them.
And once again, it would be the NFL best interest lawsuit wise, to not find anything illegal...
Of course, if the NFL purposely doesn't find it, but the government finds it anyways, that could make things pretty bad as well.
I'm thinking Snyder has muliple years left, as he ALWAYS drags his feet and goes lawsuit happy, so if the NFL attempts to force him to sell, he probably start a lawsuit and then won't find any offers that are good enough for the brand he built, etc etc.
And that's assuming the NFL owners force him to sell, which they hate doing, as they could be next...
I'm still waiting to see if Goodell does anything (both if he has the balls and if he can do anything) to Synder for reportedly breaking his Suspension, or if Goodell is going to continue to BS line that Synder isn't actively involved when he totally is... CLEARLY is, he probably had to approve the name change, the head coach said they talked weekly, and now he's reportedly in his full workload again.