Dan Synder is not the NFL owner I question the most (that would be the Browns owner claiming they're somehow losing 50 million a year, because that seems like an insider is stealing from the team to pay for a crazy lifestyle).

But seriously, the NFL needs to let Dan Synder go, I don't have a freaking clue what he's hiding, but rarely have I seen guilty people try to put as much fight as he does. Lawsuits, lawsuit lawsuits everywhere and now he's offering to pay people more to not talk with the NFL investigator which they suggested that NFL higher... it's strange up crazy...

Also name one good thing that has come during Dan Sunders ownership of the team... basically you can't...

And scandal after scandal after scandal ... basically with him or his top employees not knowing how to run an ethical company and treat people with dignity. The bare basics of any decent company... it's time the NFL let go of Dan Synder and force him to sell IMO, just like they did with the Panthers owner (except Synder won't accept it and have a lot more lawsuits involved, but it's clearly what's best for the NFL.

He's not even dead weight... he's alive weight who's actions are actively drowning others...

---

They would probably still have their traditional team name, if it wasn't for their owner being such an offensive douche.

---

I don't know Dan Snyder enough to find anything likeable about him. It's possible he is 100% unlikeable.

But...

The PFT article is a classic example of weaksauce, "nothing" reporting. "Nothing" meaning they are taking vague insinuations from other sources and putting it out as an imitation of news. What stands out to me is...
- lawyers offered money to someone whom had settled w/ D.S. to not speak about it. I think this is more or less standard for most out of court settlements. In other words, why is that newsworthy to point out if it is standard practice?

-the article is about allegations that lawyers and others had tried to interfere w/ the investigations. That statement is weak because...
1) allegations are not proven fact.
2) "interfere" is a vague term. If there was illegal activity by the lawyers, say so and charge them. If it wasn't illegal activity, than I would say that the lawyers were doing their job, which is representing their client (whom, like I said, I can't find anything obvious to like about).

That's not a knock on PFT - they appear to be very effective at getting the most amount of clicks w/ the least amount of effort.

Things like this make me feel like a cranky old man - that article has as much substance to it as the gossip at the PTA meeting about Marsha's scandalous new hairdo.

---

Hell no! Actually quite the opposite, it's an heard of practice. Offering ADDITIONAL money? No... threatening to take the original money away sure, but not additional money.

1) allegations is being used because they don't want to be used, many of these "allegations" were originally called bullshit and yet more and more fact about them keep coming out such as Gruden's email and the NFL continues to do their best job of covering up the information including not writing a report on this investigation the first time NFL has ever decided to do that. Not only that but write a summary in hand the summary out to reporters in Media. There has been nothing to suggest the cheerleader's "allegations" are wrong so far and the WFT had the proof... and yet they refuse to release it... which if said "allegations" were false you could bet they would of released it by now.

2) everything's a vague term until you actually find out the facts which is what they're trying to do and they're trying to cover it up. First you have to prove there was a crime committed before you can prove that they're trying to cover up a crime.

---

I don't know a thing about Snyder nor do I care to but hey, I like Marsha's new hairdo. I makes her look 10 years younger and 5 pounds lighter.

---

Yeah, but you know she only did it to get back at Fred. I just hope she knows what she's doing.

---

Fred's a jerk. He hangs out at Snyder's Florida pool with all those cheerleaders.

---

For the first time in NFL history, the NFL requested that an NFL investigator not write a report of their investigation and summary of their findings.

This reportedly because Beth Wilkinson report would of recommended the the NFL force the Washington owner to sell his team . This was due to not only many sexual issues but even more so the owners attempting to strong arm witnesses trying to get them to not work with the investigation (which he publicly was encouraging and welcoming).


Seriously, they should dump Synder, what good has come from having him around? The only thing I can think of, is that he's an easy division opponent for the Cowboys and Giants whom have owners with power in the NFL.

The Panthers owner was forced to resign because he openly liked to look at his female employees, and smacked their booties once in a while.

Synder has been accused of trying to take employees back to his hotel... sexually harassing employees (including males and females) and having employees that basically video taped the cheerleaders naked and tried to get them drunk with high level executives and sponsors of the team.

If this was the Panthers owner, he would of been gone a long time ago...

NFL lacks balls and brains...

---

It would be a good idea, if allegations are proven, to get rid of low-lives like Snyder.

They should get rid of all low-lives, again, should allegations be proven.

Police report: Video evidence supports allegations against New Orleans Saints RB Alvin Kamara
3:35 PM ET Mike Triplett ESPN Staff Writer

Video surveillance shows New Orleans Saints running back Alvin Kamara punching a man approximately eight times before Kamara's associates proceeded to stomp on him several more times on the ground in a Las Vegas casino Saturday morning, according to the police report from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.

Kamara was later taken into custody inside Las Vegas' Allegiant Stadium on Sunday evening after he played in the Pro Bowl. He was interviewed by police and then arrested and charged with battery resulting in substantial bodily harm and booked at the Clark County Detention Center. Kamara was released after posting bail later Sunday night.

The man, who was knocked unconscious, suffered an orbital fracture to his right eye, among other injuries, according to the police report.

Alvin Kamara was taken into custody inside Las Vegas' Allegiant Stadium after the Pro Bowl and charged with battery resulting in substantial bodily harm. Christian Petersen/Getty Images
Police said the video surveillance matched the man's account. The man said he started a conversation with one member of a group of people while waiting for an elevator as he was leaving the Cromwell Casino at Drais After Dark Club on South Las Vegas Boulevard at about 6:30 a.m. local time. When the elevator doors opened, the man started to walk toward the elevator along with the large party. But a man later identified as Kamara put his hand on the victim's chest to stop him.

The man said he then pushed Kamara's hand off his chest, and Kamara pushed back hard enough to cause the man to stumble back. Afterward the man recalled being hit and kicked by multiple people and losing consciousness.

According to the video surveillance, the man was speaking to a woman before the events occurred as he described. After Kamara pushed the man, one of Kamara's associates punched the man in the face. Then Kamara lunged toward the man and punched him approximately eight times -- including three times after he had fallen to the ground.

Three others from Kamara's group then began stomping the man in the face, chest and legs. One of Kamara's associates stomped him about 16 times, according to the police report. The incident broke up once security arrived, and Kamara and his party were escorted out of the property. Kamara was later identified through video and eyewitness accounts, and he had used his ID and credit card while at the casino. Police met him inside the stadium after the Sunday game and read him his Miranda rights before interviewing him.

Kamara told police that he was with his girlfriend, his assistant and a couple of friends. Kamara said the man called one of his friends ugly while they were waiting for the elevator and then later said, "I'll whup your ass too." Kamara said he saw a fight break out next to him and saw the man get punched. When asked why he punched the man, Kamara indicated that he thought the man was running away and had done something to his group -- so he chased him and punched him several times.

The police report notes that the video shows that the man was not running away.

Kamara was initially scheduled to have a court appearance Monday afternoon but that hearing was moved to March 8.

Neither Kamara, the Saints nor anyone representing Kamara has made any public statements on the incident yet.

The 26-year-old running back played in the Pro Bowl game and caught four passes for 23 yards for the NFC team. He has been selected to the Pro Bowl in each of his five NFL seasons and was named the league's Offensive Rookie of the Year in 2017.

---

The NFL is starting to officially turn on Dan Snyder.

After being accused of inappropriate touching of an employee, Snyder claimed he was going to have an investigation to look into the false claims, and the NFL quickly spoke up and told them, NO the NFL will do the investigation, as a team can't investigate themselves.


Now because Congress has gotten involved due to the Jon Gruden email leaks (which some have speculated might of been Synder trying to get payback at Gruden's good friend Bruce Allen (as Synder is apparently very well known to hold a grudge).

But congress is demanding information from the NFL based on their previous investigation of the Washington team.

So the NFL requested the information from the law firm, but because the investigation was more of a cover up to let the NFL learn what was going on, than an investigation to release information to the public.... the law firm demanded that the Washington team give permission for them to release the information to the NFL. (Or the law firm demanded the permission of both the team and NFL before releasing it to anyone).


The NFL has demanded the team give their permission for the law firm to release the information to the NFL, and the team has refused, citing it needs to be released to their team lawyers first... To review and redact any information it sees fit first.



https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/02/10/nfl-accuses-washington-commanders-of-impeding-congressional-probe/ 

---