Listen, Nerd doesn't have time to explain science or the legal system to simpletons like us. If he did, it would blow our minds so hard that we would die on the spot. It's better for everyone if we take his word for it.
Originally Posted by: earthquake
You won't have to take my word for it. I bet you will agree, once it is explained to you.
Stating someone has a virus, or has "tested positive" for a virus is libelous, if you cannot demonstrate that scientificially.
Once the unscientific nature of this test is explained to the NFL, it will become also known to the greater public. Whether or not the "government" wants it to be widely known, I will leave to each reader to decide for his or her self.
There's a LOT that is unscientific and logically contradictory about this "test." If I was in Aaron's position, I would be confrontational. "What evidence is there?"
Let's bring it out.
NOTE: I will focus on ONE primary area, you can all tell me how I'm wrong, if you believe me to be in error. I bet even Beast will agree with me.
Right now I gotta crash, so I can get up for work early.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”