Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
16 years ago
I don't mind sliding down but 23 might be a little low.. and all those spots just for an extra second... anyway... it begins.. now. :lol:

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/43624562.html 

Report: Patriots might want to trade with Packers
By Greg A. Bedard of the Journal Sentinel
Apr. 24, 2009 11:12 a.m.

Ted Thompson may have found his trading partner.

Sports Illustrated's Peter King is reporting the New England Patriots are attempting to trade into the top 10 in order to likely pick LSU defensive end Tyson Jackson.

So far the Jaguars at No. 8 have rejected the deal, which would be for a second-round pick.

From King:

Busy morning. The Patriots are trying to move up into the top 10 of the draft -- but low in the top 10. Executives from two teams tell me New England offered its first-round pick and middle of three second-round picks (the 23rd and 47th picks overall) to Jacksonville for the eighth pick in the draft. Jacksonville GM Gene Smith, I'm told, said no ... but I also hear the Patriots might be looking to Green Bay at nine to move as well.

Who might be the object of their affection? I'm told it may be a surprise, because smart money would say the target is LSU's Tyson Jackson, the best 3-4 defensive end in the draft and the only end versatile enough to play every spot on the defensive line. But I'm not sure it's Jackson. I think it might be an offensive player. Sorry to be so cryptic, but I truly don't know.

The Patriots are Fort Knox on draft weekend -- and, for that matter, on every weekend. Remember last year? New England traded down from seven to 10 in the first round and got the object of its affection, Tennessee linebacker Jerod Mayo, and no one ever knew Mayo was their man.

It makes infinite sense that New England would want the eighth or ninth pick, because the line of demarcation between sanity and insanity in the top 10 is right there. Check out the money that each of the players between six and 10 in last year's draft would earn with minimum play-time incentives in their five-year contracts:

6. Vernon Gholston, Jets $32.5 million
7. Sedrick Ellis, New Orleans $32 million
8. Derrick Harvey, Jacksonville $23 million
9. Keith Rivers, Cincinnati $19 million
10. Jerod Mayo, New England $16 million

It figures that New England would be targeting the eighth pick, or ninth. It's called being ahead of the curve.

My question would be this: If 3-4 maven Bill Belichick wants Jackson at No. 9, shouldn't the Packers, a newly minted 3-4 team? If the Packers were still a 4-3 team like the Jaguars, it would be a no-brainer. The Patriots are likely trying to jump ahead of the Packers for that reason. But Thompson should be able to drive up the price for that pick considering he could just stay and pick Jackson.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
Will not happen. Ted has his eye on two defensive players that will be gone in the top 15. It will take more than a 2nd to get us out of the top 15 🙂
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
The Patriots are up to their annual trickery. When it is this close to the draft be veeeery curious about reports like this.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
16 years ago
Uhhh the Patriots better offer up more than that. Horrible value. I'll take Wilfork and their 1st though. 😃
dfosterf
16 years ago

Will not happen. Ted has his eye on two defensive players that will be gone in the top 15. It will take more than a 2nd to get us out of the top 15 :)

"SlickVision" wrote:



What if Ted is targeting Peppers and wants to use the 23 in trade?

I'm not saying I'm for it, because I personally am not, I'm just saying that if he was thinking along those lines it would be one of the ways to go about it.

End result:

Peppers and a second (47th) for our 9.... (Plus obscene $$$, of course)

Now, what I WOULD be for, I'm pretty sure, (no way of knowing until we are "on the clock") is the Pats 23rd and 34th--- not the 47th.
16 years ago
We would lose so much value in the Patriots trade, we could easily work something out with better value and still trade a later 1st pick away for Peppers.
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago
Eeesh... 23 seems pretty low, unless we're positive that either anyone we really want will be gone by 9 or that some very-desired guy is going to slide a good ways.

And I'm with dfosterf - 23 and 47 is NOT going to get it done. If we go all they way back to 23 I'd want their 34, for sure.
blank
wils0646
16 years ago
For the 23rd and 34th, I'd do it. We'd have the 23rd, 34th, and 41st picks in a mediocre talented draft. It would be perfect to be loaded in this area on the board.
The Pack Will Be Back.
warhawk
16 years ago
First of all I think Jackson would be a good pick for us anyhow.

If that's the case the thing to do would be to pick him and then if NE wants him later they would have to give us the #34 AND we would know who's left on the board.
If there's somebody there Ted Thompson feels is just as good as Jackson for us then the #34 is a freebee.

There will be a lot of good players sitting at #34.
"The train is leaving the station."
Cheesey
16 years ago

First of all I think Jackson would be a good pick for us anyhow.

If that's the case the thing to do would be to pick him and then if NE wants him later they would have to give us the #34 AND we would know who's left on the board.
If there's somebody there Ted Thompson feels is just as good as Jackson for us then the #34 is a freebee.

There will be a lot of good players sitting at #34.

"warhawk" wrote:


Thats a good line of thinking Hawk. I never thought of it that way.
+1!

Fan Shout
dfosterf (2h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (2h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (2h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (10h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (11h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (12h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (12h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (14h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.