all_about_da_packers
4 years ago

A little embarrassing, but I like their openness. We're experiencing it with them.

After all these years of constantly "saying the right thing," it's refreshing. Matt's not ashamed, and has nothing to hide.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Except none of this is from Matt; the source here is Leonhard. Nothing here indicates Matt is being "open" - and I'm not so sure he'll ever publicly say that the job was offered to Leonhard.


The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
4 years ago

I'm not seeing how this is at all embarrassing. As for the Special Teams, that guy wanted more money than the Packers were willing to pay, right? So, how's that embarrassing for LaFleur?

This is how things go everyday throughout every hiring process.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I've never seen things go this way during the hiring process. Literally every interview I've done or led, the issue of (1) genuine interest/willingness to move into a different level has been at the forefront, and (2) pay expectations and what can be offered have been the most explicit conversations.

When I made the move form Canada to Texas, I literally had four rounds of being asked by the top brass if I was serious about moving (both the geographic location, area and level of legal practice), with the bosses having a two-hour conversation on my salary expectations and what their willingness on salary range/details would be. Once there was clear parameters and comfort on my willingness to join, only then was it made clear to me an offer would be forthcoming; an offer was made only after that and not before.

I've followed the same format when I've led or been part of the interviewing team. If you are going to join my team/department, I want to know if you're serious and committed about the move. Literally, whether it's cocktails after interviews, or phone discussions outside of interviews, my intent does not change from making sure the person I'm speaking with clearly wants to join the place I'm at/team/department. It's not a one round thing, it's something confirmed at the outset and reaffirmed throughout the process. And I know for a fact, as a result of budgeting / signing bonuses, there is clear communication from HR/payroll on salary expectations and range in my industry; the salary to get a deal done for a hire is clearly known.

It's an interview process, and if you couldn't discern from that process the parameters of what a deal should look like or whether the candidate is serious - especially before offering said person the job - it is (and should be) embarrassing for the individual running the interview/job hunt process. When it is made public that your first choice didn't want to come after you offered him the job, that shows to me there was some communication aspects/details that weren't paid attention to. When your job is to pay attention to details - whether game planning or running a staff - it absolutely is an embarrassing look.

There are going to be growing pains for LaFleur. Being the HC of the Packers is the first time he's really been in charge of putting together a staff; I would strongly prefer his learning experiences (i.e., missteps) didn't play out in news media. It's embarrassing that Leonhard rejecting him played out in public (after what happened in his first year with the ST coordinator position).
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
4 years ago

Except none of this is from Matt; the source here is Leonhard. Nothing here indicates Matt is being "open" - and I'm not so sure he'll ever publicly say that the job was offered to Leonhard.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



If LaFleur says the job wasn't offered to Leonhard, then what? Is it Leonhard who's embarrassed? Is it still LaFleur? I mean, the whole embarrassing angle is what's important here. The optics of it all. What says you? Who should be embarrassed?!?

Actually it's more embarrassing because the reports were public. And the reports are facts!! This is a no win for LaFleur. He has to be so red in the face with embarrassment.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
4 years ago
Joe Barry is reported as front runner. I read he was Lions DC for the zero and sixteen season. That true??? šŸ˜¢šŸ¤ÆšŸ˜¤
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
4 years ago
Not every company follows the same ā€œrulesā€ for hiring. They tend to do it their way.
And no one should be embarrassed because a guy changed his mind and turned down the job.
To me, the only problem would be that if the second choice fails, how many people will be attacking the Packer brass for messing it up. (Even though itā€™s not their fault that Leonhard skipped town).
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
4 years ago
I'm sorry to hear that Leonhard didn't want the job.
He was my first and only choice.
Oh well, back to the drawing board.
all_about_da_packers
4 years ago

If LaFleur says the job wasn't offered to Leonhard, then what? Is it Leonhard who's embarrassed? Is it still LaFleur? I mean, the whole embarrassing angle is what's important here. The optics of it all. What says you? Who should be embarrassed?!?

Actually it's more embarrassing because the reports were public. And the reports are facts!! This is a no win for LaFleur. He has to be so red in the face with embarrassment.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Then that means that Leonhard is a liar, and I was wrong. But, unless you have evidence to the contrary, Leonhard is the one going on record to say "I was about out the door", "It was very real" and "It was an awesome opportunity to get" - all quotes by Leonhard in Tom Oates' article.

Leonhard refused to join the Rams as DC last year; it isn't as if Matt LaFleur didn't know or shouldn't have suspected that Leonhard had a strong interest in remaining at UW. Especially since his friend, and former boss, was responsible for offering (and having it turned down) Leonhard the Rams DC job, I'd have expected Matt LaFleur to be aware getting Leonhard wasn't going to be simple and make sure he was still game to take the job before offering it to him. That speaks to the embarrassing part with poor attention to detail/interview process - you're former boss and current friend has relatively recently gone through and been rebuffed by Leonhard. It's LaFleur's job to make sure all the details are in place before offering a job to a candidate.

Again, there are going to be growing pains, but it's the second time it's happened to LaFleur in 2 years.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
4 years ago

Not every company follows the same ā€œrulesā€ for hiring. They tend to do it their way.
And no one should be embarrassed because a guy changed his mind and turned down the job.
To me, the only problem would be that if the second choice fails, how many people will be attacking the Packer brass for messing it up. (Even though itā€™s not their fault that Leonhard skipped town).

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Except Leonhard did this last year too, turning down McVay for the Rams DC position. Matt, even if given a pass on having a less than stellar interview process, should have at least known that Leonhard has previously rejected NFL coaching gigs - to his friend and former boss, no less - and taken proper steps to confirm Leonhard was all-in on moving before offering him the job. It's not simply interview questions - it's a process: if you're friend and/or former boss who you are on really good terms with has insight, you at least reach out to touch base. Even if for nothing else than to talk about why things may not have resulted in Leonhard becoming Rams DC and use that info to sell Leonhard on the fit/opportunity here.

The fact this it is public that Leonhard was offered but refused is not the position LaFleur wants to be in. Especially if recent history suggests that Leonhard has turned down other DC offers to stay at UW.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
nerdmann
4 years ago
They are not offering him enough to get him to take the risk. Nothing embarrassing about that. It just shows they are prudent, they have a number his services would be worth, he doesn't wanna take the risk for that amount of money.

Business is business, it's not personal.

There are no reports they are chasing Leonhard, desperately offering a blank check. THAT would be embarrassing.
ā€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a whileā€¦you do them right all the time.ā€
Mucky Tundra
4 years ago

They are not offering him enough to get him to take the risk. Nothing embarrassing about that. It just shows they are prudent, they have a number his services would be worth, he doesn't wanna take the risk for that amount of money.

Business is business, it's not personal.

There are no reports they are chasing Leonhard, desperately offering a blank check. THAT would be embarrassing.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



From what I understand, Leonhard is paid more at Wisconsin than most DCs make in the NFL with a lot more job security. In order to lure him away, they'd have to make him one of the highest paid DCs in the NFL right off the bat with no track record at the NFL level. Unfortunately this is going to be misconstrued as the Packers low balling him.
ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (4h) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
packerfanoutwest (5h) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
TheKanataThrilla (6h) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
Mucky Tundra (6h) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
TheKanataThrilla (6h) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
Mucky Tundra (6h) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
Mucky Tundra (7h) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
Zero2Cool (7h) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Great throw by Hurts
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
Mucky Tundra (7h) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
Mucky Tundra (7h) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
beast (7h) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
beast (7h) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
packerfanoutwest (7h) : wtf Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
Mucky Tundra (7h) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
TheKanataThrilla (7h) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
Mucky Tundra (7h) : oh fuck me i messed that up
Zero2Cool (7h) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
Zero2Cool (7h) : Carter was 9th overall
Zero2Cool (7h) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
Zero2Cool (7h) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
packerfanoutwest (8h) : another crap halftime show
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : I think it is over, but then I think of Atlanta and want Philly to go in with the same intensity in the second half
Mucky Tundra (8h) : And with a Pass Rush that might as well be on a milk cartoon and no Jaire
Martha Careful (8h) : I cant help but feel good about how well the Packers D played in Philly during the playoffs
Mucky Tundra (8h) : this game is over
Mucky Tundra (8h) : This might be the kill shot here
Mucky Tundra (8h) : oh that's such a bad penalty for KC after getting the 3rd down stop
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : Philly DL has come to play
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : Ceoper DeJean with the INT scored...bad memories of draft night
Mucky Tundra (8h) : ok scratch that
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Game feels like last years Super Bowl: 49ers started off in control, moved the ball well but didn't have much of a lead to show for it
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : KC jumped and they call it on Eagles. WTF refs
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : If he was offside why did you let him pop the QB?
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : I like that Eagles are controlling time of possession so far.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : If the Eagles are going to win, this is how they do it: jump all over the Chiefs and don't let it turn into a close one
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : Bad throw created that penalty.
TheKanataThrilla (9h) : Amazed Philly got that hit to the helmet call.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

7-Feb / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.