NFL must fix playoff seeding system· Page 3

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

It's not gonna change. Look how hard it is for the NFL to agree on ANYTHING. To overhaul the playoff system that much.....i can't see the owners EVER coming together on this.

mi_keys
Senior Member

15 years ago

#22

mi_keys: You've obviously put a lot of thought into this, but you lost me right at the beginning by saying that fairness should not matter. If you throw the idea of fairness out the window, then you can justify any playoff system.

The situation you describe in your second-to-last paragraph seems pretty rare to me. At any rate, I would expect that in the system that Vandermause proposes, if two teams have the same record and one of them won the division, the division winner would get home field. So those games would still matter.

"Greg C." wrote:

Thank you for being the only one to respond to my post.

That said, I'm not saying fairness should be completely ignored, I am saying it is not the only and possibly not even the most important factor in deciding a playoff seeding system. Most playoff seeding systems have a large degree of fairness and some inequities and that's why I think you need to consider other things such as strengthening the meaning of the division.

In my example, two teams in one division can't possibly finish behind the two teams in the other division. Under Vandermause, they know they will be the 3rd and 4th seeds and get the wild card home game. Likewise, the two in the other division know they will be the 5th and 6th seeds and thus away in the first round of the playoffs. Under the current system the teams in the same division need to win because they need to win their division to have a home field game.

Also, don't assume that is the only scenario in which Vandermause's proposed system would end up with meaningless games at the end of the season. The point was to give an example that is no less likely than the specific example we've run into this year and to suggest that any reductions in the number of games that are meaningless at the end of the year would be minimal at best.

Born and bred a cheesehead

RaiderPride
Senior Member

15 years ago

#23

Not to mention the lost revenue for the city of Green Bay and the business owners and employees of Green Bay.

A home game would have brought a great deal of money to Green Bay.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#24

True R.P.
But in the future, it could just as easily take away a home playoff game from GB if the roles were reversed.

mi_keys
Senior Member

15 years ago

#25

Give the divisional games real meaning beyond mere rivalry pride. Right now they're of essentially ancillary, symbolic importance at best. A team could conceivably lose every game in the division and still be crowned division winner. That makes no sense to me.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Division games are the most important regular season games you have. The easiest way to get into the playoffs and have a good seed is to win the division and that's hard to do if you don't win your division games. They are the most important tiebreaker. You are understating their importance to say they are just symbolic.

Born and bred a cheesehead

mi_keys
Senior Member

15 years ago

#26

Fairness is a funny thing.

Do we really believe that the best determinant of a team's strength is W/L record when they don't have completely common opponents. It makes sense for a division winner, since the majority of a divisional rival's opponents is the same. But beyond that, I'm not sure.

I mean, if it was just a matter of W/L record, why do we have everyone and their mother going off about "power ratings" and such?

The nice thing about W/L record is that it is an easy number to read. It is not, however, an easy number to interpret. Or rather, it doesn't contain as much information about "what's fair" or "who's best" as people like Vandermause think.

JMO

"Wade" wrote:

A fair point, but as you point out W/L is the easiest to read and it should have a very strong correlation with how strong a team is. It's a causal relationship, the better you are the more you'll win. Obviously if someone has tougher schedule or bad luck, there will be variability. But it's the simplest model and generally does a pretty good job of picking better teams. As for the power rankings, people play around with those because they're fun.

Born and bred a cheesehead

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

4 years ago

#27

I don't like the rules, too, but unfortunately that are the rules. And if you're a hot team, you don't care about playing at home or not. The Steelers (#6) made it to Vince, so will the Packers :D

Originally Posted by: GermanGilbert

GermanGilbert was spot on!

Emeraldgreen
Rookie

4 years ago

#28

I'm a long time fan of the NFL, and to me I want to be fair for all. The object of playing each season is to win as many games as possible, and then go to the playoffs. Now, I have a serious issue when it comes to wins versus division winners. I hate this rule. A team with a losing record who happens to win their division gets into the playoffs automatic. Such as the case this season in the NFC EAST. All 4 teams have losing records. But then there are teams with much better records than this team, and they don't go to the playoffs/ Then what's the use of winning all the games if your going to be knocked out by a losing team? Ok so what big deal, you won your division because the other 3 teams are worse than you. But because you win your division that makes you guaranteed a spot in the playoffs, and the team who worked and played to win, and did win more games, and they sit out, no way something is terribly wrong with that concept.
If a team has the best record in their division , yes that team can be granted division winners, but don't let a team who worked hard and win more games than your team and then be shut out???

wpr
Preferred Member

4 years ago

#29

In general it doesn't make sense to let a divisional winner into the playoffs with a losing record. For the most part I have advocated that teams should have a winning record in order to make the playoffs. At the very least be 8-8.

That said, in 2010 Seattle made the playoffs with a 7-9 record. Because they won the west they hosted NOLA. At 11-5 some people felt they were the 2nd best team in the NFC that year even though the 11-5 Bears got the first round bye. When Seattle beat the Saints and GB beat the Eagles, it changed the whole playoffs. Ever since then I have not minded when weak divisional winners make the playoffs. They "won" based on the system that is in place.

In order to alleviate this from happening the NFL needs fewer divisions with more teams. The issue becomes attempting to balance everything. They can't have 3 divisions of 5 without losing 2 teams. If they expand and have 3 divisions of 6 you would not see weak teams with losing records make the playoffs. The issue would then become how do you play every team in your division twice and still play other teams not only in your conference but also have non conference games too.

It can be done if 6th place teams face each other and so one. If they do this there is a downside. The weakest teams will have a very weak schedule the following year. When the NFL did this years ago Atlanta made it to the Super Bowl. A couple of other teams have gone from last to first then disappear again. I think the 2006 Bears team had a very easy schedule too after a very bad 2005 season.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

4 years ago

#30

I think a lot of people complain about the seeding and complaints will always be discovered because there really isn't a flawless strategy. How could there be?

Personally, I haven't liked four team divisions. I think it devalues winning the division. I'm not saying this is the, just saying I'd like it.

Two Conferences
Four Divisions
Eight Teams / Division

Each team plays their divisional opponents twice. Each team plays the opposite conference division opponent where they finished and alternate divisions each year. (if they go 17 games, you just add another matchup)

It'll make those who like seeing AFC vs NFC matchups every 4 years cry, but I don't really care. They are gonna cry anyway.

Then the division winners get a BYE week. Each conference gets four wild card teams.

Or some shit like that.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (3h) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame

dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!

Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.

dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?

Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.

Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself

Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"

Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs

Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade

Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade

dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us

dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.

wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.

Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served

dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year

dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot

dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy

dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.

dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy

dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year

dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.

dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest

dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.

Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?

Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason

Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”

Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.

Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.

Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH

beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.

Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law

Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter

Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter

Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp

dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night

dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60

dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO

Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m

dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions

dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing

Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.

dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup

dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw

dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.

Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.

Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.

wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.

Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2025 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM

COMMANDERS

Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM

Browns

Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM

Cowboys

Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM

BENGALS

Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM

Cardinals

Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM

Steelers

Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM

PANTHERS

Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM

EAGLES

Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM

Giants

Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM

Bears

Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM

RAVENS

Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM

Vikings