Should the packers be making an offer to the Jags for Ngakoue?

stevegb
Member Topic Starter

4 years ago

According to the nfl website Ngakoue is disgruntled and wants out of Jacksonville but jags refuse to part ways without proper compensation, apparently having turned down a pro bowler being offered due to “fit”. Do you guys think it’s worth trading for Ngakoue, he’s a 25 year old Edge rusher who had averaged roughly 9-10 sacks a year since 2016.

blank

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

4 years ago

Originally Posted by: stevegb

I think the Jaguars are going to ask for too much and won't let him go for anything reasonable. I also don't know the player well enough to even know what would be reasonable. I am always down for more pass rushing dudes though.

beast
Select Member

4 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

The Jaguars have done this before, refuse all offers until they get someone that's willing to over pay, and they had success with it, which means they'll continue it.

Of course, usually it's been the over aggressive Rams who have bought in, which they're now dealing with the lack of cap and their attempt to go all in basically has ruined any shot at the Superbowl for the next couple of years for them.

The Packers already have two big contracts at edge rusher and a high valued draft pick which they're trying to develop. The chances are slim and nine that they add another expensive pass rusher right now, none, when it involves trades as well.

The next questions are where does Clowney end up, and is there a season? Then maybe trades.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

4 years ago

Wouldn't you have to trade one of the Smiths for him? I love to have depth at edge rusher, but there is a point where we need to get Gary involved and that won't happen with 3 established edge rushers. The guy is also on a 1 year deal worth almost $18M and a UFA next season. Seems like a very risky proposition.

wpr
Preferred Member

4 years ago

No for all the reasons listed above.
I think Beast said (typed) it best when he said the chances are "slim to nine". Well said young man. Well said.

In response to Thrilla's query, no trade.

nyrpack
Veteran Member

4 years ago

not for the money he will get !!

jimmy b.

beast
Select Member

4 years ago

No for all the reasons listed above.
I think Beast said (typed) it best when he said the chances are "slim to nine". Well said young man. Well said.

In response to Thrilla's query, no trade.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Just remember, that a nine on a nillion scale 😉

Cheesey
Preferred Member

4 years ago

Just remember, that a nine on a nillion scale ;-)

Originally Posted by: beast

If I’ve told you once, I’ve told you a NILLION times, don’t exaggerate!😁😂🤪

I just figured you were German, and “nine!” Means “NO” in German!😂

beast
Select Member

4 years ago

If I’ve told you once, I’ve told you a NILLION times, don’t exaggerate!😁😂🤪

I just figured you were German, and “nine!” Means “NO” in German!😂

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

I am German (ancestry wise), so yeah, that's it 😉 , you figure it out 😂

Na, just the cellphone typing and the i and o are right next to each other.

Also nillion is great, because does it mean billion or million, one key spot off from both.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

4 years ago

#10

Originally Posted by: beast

I’m part German ancestry wise too! Maybe we’re related!
Wouldn’t that just fry your eggs!😁😂😁😂
Hey cousin Beast!🤣

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (5h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (15h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (15h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (15h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (19h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (19h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (19h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (22h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (22h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (22h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (22h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (22h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (22h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (22h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (22h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS