Why was Redmond sill in the game?

gbguy20
Veteran Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

I still can't believe pettine kept Redmond in while we were getting run over instead of putting in Goodson. How the heck does that make sense, mike?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

5 years ago

I still can't believe pettine kept Redmond in while we were getting run over instead of putting in Goodson. How the heck does that make sense, mike?

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

I wondered the same thing during the game

KRK
Veteran Member

5 years ago

I don't Pettine sees things as well from the sideline. He may feel the game better, but being down there does not allow you to see as well. Nor dispassionately analyst and adjust IMO.

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

5 years ago

I don't Pettine sees things as well from the sideline. He may feel the game better, but being down there does not allow you to see as well. Nor dispassionately analyst and adjust IMO.

Originally Posted by: KRK

Wait, I thought we hated it when he was in the upper deck? And what the fook does Pettine have to do with Davante Adams? What the hell happened here lol

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

It's a passing league and a poor coverage LB (on a brand new team) doesn't cover as well as the average Safety.

Yeah they could put in Goodson, but then the Eagles might have a field day throwing to their TEs getting a clear mismatch, and you could be yelling why did Pettine out another Safety on him, instead of a poor coverage LB?

Either way there is gonna be a mismatch (and Doug Peterson is one of the best play callers at exploding these mismatches), you got to pick the one that you feel better suits your team and when it doesn't work, deal with the fans questioning you on why you didn't choose the other mismatch that you thought would be worse.

gbguy20
Veteran Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

Originally Posted by: beast

The eagles put up 200 yards rushing and your argument is we shouldn't adjust to that because then they might be successful somewhere else? Switching to someone who can stop the run and may be iffy in coverage is better than leaving someone in who clearly can't do either.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Pure Bullshit! I'm pretty sure no one on any football forum has ever suggested NOT adjusting, as that's part of what football is all about, so that's pure bullshit of a false argument.

I'm suggesting the coaches have to do what they think is best... (after all, it's their job and their expertise) and if it doesn't work, they have crazy ranting fans bitching and moaning no matter what happened.

Also you comparison at the bottom is highly questionable... one guy change can suddenly stop it? That's like magic... and saying he may be iffy in coverage and then suggesting the other guy is even lower because he can't do anything is pure nonsense as Redman is clearly better in coverage, CLEARLY... most Safeties are clearly better than a LB than struggles in coverage. Even the announcers during the game talked about how the Eagles TEs basically needs top level coverage and how most LBers can't do it.

The coach had to pick his poison... he choose. It didn't work out, so now we bitch about how the other poison would of been a clearly better choice by hyping up the other options and devaluing the option chosen. Despite most teams choosing a similar poison as DBs become more common and LBers less (or LBers that have Safety like traits become more common and probably would of been SS two decades ago).

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (38m) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (4h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (6h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (8h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22