Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

If any of the other players start trying to change plays at the line of scrimmage, they'll have increased responsibility too.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yeah: lots and lots of pushups on the sidelines.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
Clearly, some posters may not have had the benefit of playing offense in an actual organized football game other than pee-wee football. At any level of reasonable quality, the quarterback can and must change the play at the line of scrimmage. In our case, with an highly experience QB, those options should not be mitigated.

Because of the nature and construct of the offense, i.e. with more pre-snap and motion, there are fewer viable options which can be called. Douche bag Florio takes this limitation into a pseudo-story to create controversy. He is a smug turd, IMO.

Additionally, what seems to go unnoticed is that coverages on the defensive side of the ball change all the time with shifts and motion, an no one seems to give a rip about these changes or who might be making them.

Enough.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Clearly, some posters may not have had the benefit of playing offense in an actual organized football game other than pee-wee football. At any level of reasonable quality, the quarterback can and must change the play at the line of scrimmage. In our case, with an highly experience QB, those options should not be mitigated.

Because of the nature and construct of the offense, i.e. with more pre-snap and motion, there are fewer viable options which can be called. Douche bag Florio takes this limitation into a pseudo-story to create controversy. He is a smug turd, IMO.

Additionally, what seems to go unnoticed is that coverages on the defensive side of the ball change all the time with shifts and motion, an no one seems to give a rip about these changes or who might be making them.

Enough.

Originally Posted by: KRK 



Sandlot ball.

I would call out the routes to the WR's and usually one of my buddies was one so when we'd head to the line I'd give him a nod to cut his route in --- I liked having one WR streak down the line while the opposite side WR crossed into the middle of the field. I got chewed out a few times lol ... "Why the fuck you make me run so damn far if you weren't even gonna throw me the ball!!" Great times


UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago
Little bit of extra cardio never hurt anyone. I liked doing 3 streaks down the sideline in a bunch but having one of them stop on a quick comeback
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
steveishere
5 years ago
Rodgers has been in the nfl for 14 seasons, LaFleur would be a complete dope to not have audibles built into the offense lol. The obsession over the audible thing is hilarious.
warhawk
5 years ago

I would be willing to bet if you asked every defensive coordinator and every defensive player Arod will face this year they would all say "please take this out of his hands." Yet some here say yeah let's do that. What?
Now Matt LaFleur is a puppet because he didn't let Goff or Mariotta do it. Doesn't matter that that they weren't ready for it. Mariota had thrown more INT's than TD's the prior year but heck throw the "audible thing" on him anyhow. I'm sure that would have went well. Matt LaFleur is here as HC, in part, because of decisions he has made like this in the past. He doesn't need to start making the wrong ones now.

"The train is leaving the station."
sschind
5 years ago

Clearly, some posters may not have had the benefit of playing offense in an actual organized football game other than pee-wee football. At any level of reasonable quality, the quarterback can and must change the play at the line of scrimmage. In our case, with an highly experience QB, those options should not be mitigated.

Because of the nature and construct of the offense, i.e. with more pre-snap and motion, there are fewer viable options which can be called. Douche bag Florio takes this limitation into a pseudo-story to create controversy. He is a smug turd, IMO.

Additionally, what seems to go unnoticed is that coverages on the defensive side of the ball change all the time with shifts and motion, an no one seems to give a rip about these changes or who might be making them.

Enough.

Originally Posted by: KRK 



those options should not be mitigated

I agree with this about 90% and the reason you answered yourself with

Because of the nature and construct of the offense, i.e. with more pre-snap and motion, there are fewer viable options which can be called.

Rodgers needs to realize this an be content to trust MLF. This doesn't mean he can't audible he just needs to know that not all audibles may be viable options. In that respect his ability to audible should be mitigated. He needs to know he can't call whatever he wants whenever he wants.

As you and other have pointed out Aaron Rodgers has been one of the best and one of the most successful QBs in the game. For any coach young or old, veteran or rookie, to completely disregard this and take away his ability to use the knowledge he has gained would be flat out stupid. Something tells me MLF is not stupid.

As far as QBs calling audibles I'm sure they all have that option if the time is right. Some coaches may have varying degrees of tolerance to it but for any coach to tell his QB "you can't audible" I think is a huge mistake. QBs see things after the play is sent in and before the ball is snapped that may make changing the call the smart thing to do. I would hope every coach realizes that.
Cheesey
5 years ago

Let's see if Aaron is willing to line up under center and hand the ball off.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



He won’t. He will throw the ball EVERY play! He never handed the ball off even ONCE in the last 15 years!!!!🙄 😉
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (1m) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (8h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (12h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (14h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Random Babble / beast

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.