yooperfan
5 years ago
Like most fans I've talked to I was surprised but I'm guessing they needed the cap space to sign Clark.
He was on his last year and getting long in the tooth but I really thought they would keep him for his last year.
Mucky Tundra
5 years ago
UserPostedImage
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Zero2Cool
5 years ago
Talks with three teams. Simple. Take highest offer and walk. What's the salary difference from trading VS releasing?

When news that the Packers were releasing defensive lineman Mike Daniels broke on Wednesday morning, one of the responses was to wonder why the team waited until the start of training camp to make the move. General Manager Brian Gutekunst was asked about that in a press conference later in the day. Gutekunst didn't say [more]

Continue Reading @ Josh Alper 

Josh Alper wrote:


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
5 years ago
Daniel's earned his right to make his own deal, wherever he wants to go. Probably end up in Cleveland.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
5 years ago

UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 



So.......Daniels is becoming a NUN???🤣
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
5 years ago
Old news

Time to move on.

Mike will be fine.

Cleveland will love him.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Old news

Time to move on.

Mike will be fine.

Cleveland will love him.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 


Old news? Holy shit fuck stick balls! He was released YESTERDAY! You want more Top 100 NFL player articles or what? IF you want to move on, then don't chime in on the subject that others may have other things to say.

UserPostedImage
Cheesey
5 years ago

UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 



Sister Daniels interview with ESPN:
ESPN- So Mike, you decided to stop playing football and becoming a NUN?

Daniels- That’s correct....and if I don’t see you in church Sunday, I’m gonna come looking for you and I’m gonna kick your butt!

ESPN- Uh.....see you in church Sunday, sista Daniels!!!
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago
It's an interesting move. Naturally there was a discussion among the coaching staff and front office over this issue. It would be interesting to know all the pros and cons and how divided were they over this.
One thing for sure- it messes up all the early attempts to predict the opening day roster.
UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago

Wow....getting rid of our best D-lineman?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


With all due respect to Daniels (who has been great!), Clark has passed him as our best.

This is the continued purging of TT's roster.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 


I don't think the reason is purging TT's roster at all... I think the reason is because there was so much young potential behind Daniels.

We couldn’t get something?
Off the field unknowns?
Did he fully recover from his injury?

I can’t help but think we are about to sign/ trade for somebody,..perhaps an ILB

Originally Posted by: KRK 



I think we're over thinking this... Gute has made a number of moves, ie releasing/cutting/trading Nelson, Haha, Monty, Whitehead, Perry and now Daniels all when their is young talent with potential behind them... potential to grow and potentially become very good starters. (Well no FS, but moving Tramon to FS opened up the window for CBs with potential).

This seems to be all about opening spots for young guys with great physical potential to grow into, giving them a chance to grow... also probably saving cap money/space in the process.

And same with TE Graham, whom a number of people want gone... there was no young guy with great physical potential to grow into the spot, which is one of the reasons Graham stayed (plus I think he could be a great fit for the slot role in this system... but so could St. Brown or Moore if they develop and show more, so Graham could be gone next season if they develop, but they didn't look quite ready last year and Graham clearly has better in him, in a Mike McCarthy system that doesn't use TEs nearly as well (according to some of his past TEs)).

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
bboystyle (5m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (15m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (35m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (44m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (55m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
5m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.