wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago

Joe Theismann, whose number hasn't been retired in Washington, may or may not let rookie Dwayne Haskins wear it. (As if Theismann has any place to object.) Clay Matthews, whose number definitely hasn't been retired in Green Bay, would apparently prefer that rookie Rashan Gary not don No. 52. "The body's not even cold yet [more]

Continue Reading @ Mike Florio 

Mike Florio wrote:



Is he really surprised? There are only so many numbers to go around. 90 players in TC. 6 retired numbers. There are not a lot of options out there.
UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago

Is he really surprised? There are only so many numbers to go around. 90 players in TC. 6 retired numbers. There are not a lot of options out there.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Personally I am surprised as the Packers normally seem to try to hold off on putting it on someone at the exact same position who is surely going to make the roster.

Like a TE is wearing Nelson's number now instead of a WR. Or give it to a jag for one year, and then someone who'll make the roster.

If this was one year removed then I wouldn't be surprised at all...

My pure wild guess is they gave Gary a list of the open roster numbers and he choose that one, vs them selecting it.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago
i took it more as Clay having fun with it but i suppose we should err on the side of cynicism instead
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
5 years ago
Not really sure how I feel about it. But I’m pretty sure he picked the number himself. I saw on Gary’s caption of an Instagram post “5-2=3”. He wore the #3 in college, and obviously that is not an option at his position in the NFL.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago

i took it more as Clay having fun with it but i suppose we should err on the side of cynicism instead

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I figured he was having a little fun. Mostly.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

I figured he was having a little fun. Mostly.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Agreed. Yet, some are saying they're convinced Clay is butt hurt. I mean, that's exactly the kind of person we've seen since 2009. Someone who's hyper sensitive and easily butt hurt. 🤔🙄🙄
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
5 years ago
My opinion, this is much to do about nothing. Clay knows the business... it was a funny quip.

In the chance it wasn't and he his "butt-hurt", so what. He moved on.. we moved on. Life in the NFL.

No scandal, no drama, just a business decision. This seems like trying to create drama and a story line.






"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Cheesey
5 years ago
I would think any player seeing his number given to another guy would be bothered by it. Even if both sides moved on.
The thing is, had Mathews kept playing as he did his first couple of years here, they might not have let him go.
To me, he seemed to have lost something, or just didn’t give it all the last several seasons.
He seemed like a prima dona, and was always saying “look at me!” By his actions.
Maybe I’m wrong. It just seemed he was more in love with himself.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago
He lost his speed, which was his money maker. It was incredibly evident this season.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
sschind
5 years ago

I would think any player seeing his number given to another guy would be bothered by it. Even if both sides moved on.
The thing is, had Mathews kept playing as he did his first couple of years here, they might not have let him go.
To me, he seemed to have lost something, or just didn’t give it all the last several seasons.
He seemed like a prima dona, and was always saying “look at me!” By his actions.
Maybe I’m wrong. It just seemed he was more in love with himself.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



I can certainly see why you might feel that way. While his actions on the field were certainly attention drawing for me they were more of an extension of excitement and exuberance and they didn't fit the bill for me as a typical prima donna. To me being a prima donna carries over to off the field antics as well and I certainly never saw that from Clay. To me his off the field persona never really meshed with his on the field theatrics.

I think his comment about his number was nothing more than a little joke which seems perfectly in line with they way I always perceived him.

I can very easily see him becoming the next Jennings or Finley in the minds of many Packer fans. He was a player that many fans felt was way overpaid by the end of his career and some fans like to hold that against players. I get the impression that a lot of fans will be willing to turn on him in a heartbeat at the first sign of anything negative coming from him. I've seen it to a small degree already with this little non news story. People telling him to get over it and calling him butt hurt and crap like that. Just wait until he dares breath anything that can be construed as remotely negative about Rodgers and he will become the next ex Packer pariah.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (3h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (3h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (10h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (11h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (12h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (12h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (14h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.