tromadz
16 years ago


Then the same logic goes for Chicago. They will be healthier and grow from within correct?

"dd80forever" wrote:



I'm glad you brought that up. For younger teams, the waiting and experience is good. For an older team(Bears), it has the opposite effect. Older players get slower. And yes, it happens to all teams, even our Donald Driver might show the signs of aging some day(although with the way he's playing, not anytime soon).

The difference is, as you know, we're one of the youngest teams in the NFL and won't have to worry about that too much. I mean even Devin Hester is slowing down a bit(injuries didn't help) and he's their fastest and flashiest threat.

They have guys like Forte and Olsen who should improve as the years go on, but for every Forte, there's a couple Olin Kreutzes and Roberto Garzas.
beast
16 years ago

so I was wrong about something, my thoughts dont matter. You've never been wrong I take it? Impressive. Once again, kudos to dd80forever.

"dd80forever" wrote:



I'm done with you, however I don't appreciate you calling posts "dumb" and I will let it go at that.

Secondly, the amount of impact that Cutler has on the Bears may be downplayed by many but there is no denying that his signing has improved a 9-7 football team.

I'm not saying they are lock for a SB or even the NFC North but they sure are sitting alot better than they were at the end of last season. Like it or not this team has taken very minor steps thus far this offseason in improving the team. Tell me in what position we have significantly upgraded from last years roster.

"tromadz" wrote:



Easy. Dom Capers.

Bob Sanders not on the sideline should help us win 2 more games easy. A healthy team should help for about 2 more(thats 10 wins). Growing from within(you know, younger players getting experience from last year) should get us one more I'd say.

Addition by subtraction.

And yeah we got some offensive line and seconday depth in free agency so far.

"dd80forever" wrote:




Then the same logic goes for Chicago. They will be healthier and grow from within correct?

"tromadz" wrote:



You never know about health..... and yes they will grow from with in but at a much smaller scale because they have a lot less talented young guys. The Packers have a lot of talented young guys that can grow a lot unlike most of the teams in the NFC North.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
16 years ago
Well I am in the boat that we will be 10-6 or better this coming season. I have a feeling dom is going to turn our D around and make some good plays this coming season.

I would really like some vetern experience ie carter on the team. But seems like Ted Thompson is not going to grab him. Or worse case scenario wait till after the draft and 'try' to grab him for cheap.
bozz_2006
16 years ago
so, nobody cares that I've never been wrong? Fine. Screw you guys.
UserPostedImage
dd80forever
16 years ago


Then the same logic goes for Chicago. They will be healthier and grow from within correct?

"tromadz" wrote:



I'm glad you brought that up. For younger teams, the waiting and experience is good. For an older team(Bears), it has the opposite effect. Older players get slower. And yes, it happens to all teams, even our Donald Driver might show the signs of aging some day(although with the way he's playing, not anytime soon).

The difference is, as you know, we're one of the youngest teams in the NFL and won't have to worry about that too much. I mean even Devin Hester is slowing down a bit(injuries didn't help) and he's their fastest and flashiest threat.

They have guys like Forte and Olsen who should improve as the years go on, but for every Forte, there's a couple Olin Kreutzes and Roberto Garzas.

"dd80forever" wrote:




Well actually Chicago is pretty young as well.
Outside of Kruetz and now Pace and maybe Urlacher they are not that old.

Most of there skill positions are filled with young guys. We are really not that much younger than them.

It's great to be young but eventually the guys have to develop. We've been the youngest team in the league for 3 years.
blank
Stevetarded
16 years ago

so, nobody cares that I've never been wrong? Fine. Screw you guys.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



If you predict a superbowl victory for the Pack next year I'll care.
blank
porky88
16 years ago



My point is everyone is focusing in on the Bears, but top to bottom Green Bay and Minnesota are still better teams.

"dd80forever" wrote:




I strongly disagree. The Bears were 3 games better than us last year without Cutler. Saying the Pack is better is kind of stretching it here. All those holes you talk about were there last year and they were 9-7. Add Cutler to the team and they have to be the favorites in the NFC North.


I'm really looking for some logic behind your statement. The Packers have done nothing to improve, other than a new Def. Coordinator. If the Packers are going to improve so much from within I would assume it's safe to say so will the Bears. Now toss in Cutler to the equasion as well.


The point on making a move now wasn't to make one that wouldn't help the team just for the sake of making one, but rather speed up the process of signing someone assuming Ted was going to do so.


There are players out there that will improve this team. Ted's needs to quit fiddling around and make someone a priority sign. Or we can just sit still and watch the other teams pass us even further by.

"porky88" wrote:



2009 is a new year with new players and new everything. Some players will disappoint and some will surprise. I don't think the difference between GB, Chicago, and Minnesota is a lot. It's basically a toss up. Minnesota is probably the best built team, but they have the worse QB situation arguably in the league next to the Jets right now. GB has a lot of good young talent and is a year removed from 13 wins, but they have a new defensive scheme. Chicago has a new QB, but they have probably more holes than the other two teams.

None of these teams are gold. All of them are more bronze. Even Matt Forte who is being hyped up averaged the same 3.9 yards per carry that Ryan Grant did last year. Cutler and Rodgers are very close. Both offensive lines are average at best. I'll take the Packers receivers anyday. Defensively they were about the same last year.

The Packers were an injury riddled team facing the biggest distraction throughout the entire season last year with the Brett Favre situation. They still beat the Bears bad at Lambeau and played them toe to toe in Chicago. If Chicago was this high and mighty football team, they would've taken care of GB especially in conditions that suited them.

Add Jay Cutler and another year to an average defense and it's not much different. They overachieved last year and I don't' think they'll overachieve this year. I think they'll play to their level which is 8 or 9 wins. That might be enough to win the North. I suspect the three teams will beat up on each other.

By the logic I keep hearing you say though then I wonder.... How the heck did the 07 Packers elevate pass the Bears? GB added Frank Walker and a bunch of poor draft picks and won 13 games. Chicago was coming off of a Super Bowl appearance. That logic you're using and other people in defense of GB doesn't work. Another season brings new football.
Bigbyfan
16 years ago



My point is everyone is focusing in on the Bears, but top to bottom Green Bay and Minnesota are still better teams.

"porky88" wrote:




I strongly disagree. The Bears were 3 games better than us last year without Cutler. Saying the Pack is better is kind of stretching it here. All those holes you talk about were there last year and they were 9-7. Add Cutler to the team and they have to be the favorites in the NFC North.


I'm really looking for some logic behind your statement. The Packers have done nothing to improve, other than a new Def. Coordinator. If the Packers are going to improve so much from within I would assume it's safe to say so will the Bears. Now toss in Cutler to the equasion as well.


The point on making a move now wasn't to make one that wouldn't help the team just for the sake of making one, but rather speed up the process of signing someone assuming Ted was going to do so.


There are players out there that will improve this team. Ted's needs to quit fiddling around and make someone a priority sign. Or we can just sit still and watch the other teams pass us even further by.

"dd80forever" wrote:



2009 is a new year with new players and new everything. Some players will disappoint and some will surprise. I don't think the difference between GB, Chicago, and Minnesota is a lot. It's basically a toss up. Minnesota is probably the best built team, but they have the worse QB situation arguably in the league next to the Jets right now. GB has a lot of good young talent and is a year removed from 13 wins, but they have a new defensive scheme. Chicago has a new QB, but they have probably more holes than the other two teams.

None of these teams are gold. All of them are more bronze. Even Matt Forte who is being hyped up averaged the same 3.9 yards per carry that Ryan Grant did last year. Cutler and Rodgers are very close. Both offensive lines are average at best. I'll take the Packers receivers anyday. Defensively they were about the same last year.

The Packers were an injury riddled team facing the biggest distraction throughout the entire season last year with the Brett Favre situation. They still beat the Bears bad at Lambeau and played them toe to toe in Chicago. If Chicago was this high and mighty football team, they would've taken care of GB especially in conditions that suited them.

Add Jay Cutler and another year to an average defense and it's not much different. They overachieved last year and I don't' think they'll overachieve this year. I think they'll play to their level which is 8 or 9 wins. That might be enough to win the North. I suspect the three teams will beat up on each other.

By the logic I keep hearing you say though then I wonder.... How the heck did the 07 Packers elevate pass the Bears? GB added Frank Walker and a bunch of poor draft picks and won 13 games. Chicago was coming off of a Super Bowl appearance. That logic you're using and other people in defense of GB doesn't work. Another season brings new football.

"porky88" wrote:



Couldn't have said it better myself. +1
blank
Cheesey
16 years ago
With what the Bears gave up to get Cutler, it will be harder for them to "build from within".
Losing those 1st rounders will hurt them down the line.

Our D will be totally different then last year. Yes, alot of the same players, but alot of times changing the scheme can totally change the quality of defense. Thats what i think will happen. Our D will be alot better.

To run out and sign someone to "offset" that the Bears signed someone makes no sense.
As it is, Cutler STILL hasn't proven himself to be a winner. I know he's lost more games then he;s won.
And now he's gone to a team with little talent WR wise.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
16 years ago
ya I find that quite interesting also cheesey; chicago just got cutler one of the premier QBs of the league and yet they have hardly any good WR to throw too.

Perhaps they will try to trade or draft some but now their draft picks are 'screwed' for this year. So Cutler is going to have to throw to TEs and not so good WRers.

Better for us thou and our secondary 😉
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (9h) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (10h) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (10h) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (11h) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (11h) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (11h) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (13h) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (16h) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (16h) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (16h) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (16h) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (16h) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (18h) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (18h) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (18h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (18h) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : But when I go it, Martha's is the last reply
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Still a little screwy; it shows on the main forum that you were the last person to reply to the Jenkins trade thread
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Host issues, been crazy day
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Connect 4?
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Connecting to new database
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : What the hell
    beast (22-Jul) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    44m / Around The NFL / beast

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    4h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.