Just got an update on my phone that the Raiders have released Jordy. I don’t know how to post that from my app to here.

Thoughts on potentially trying to bring him back?

---

Whom would you cut to make room for him?

---

Why would we?

---

Right now you have Adams, MVS, EQ, Moore and Davis under contract. A few other probably but they are not any I would cry over by losing. Allison has been tendered and will likely be back that's 6. Davis is only here because no one has been better than he is at returns but if there was a better player at another position I think we could safely part ways with him. There would be room for Jordy IF we wanted him. Personally I don't think we do.

Because all of our receivers last year pretty much sucked except for Davante.

---

Allison didn't suck.
Cobb didn't suck.
Scantling didn't suck.

The other two rookies... They were rookies.


Jordy was released so the offense would go through Davante. Ask Brian.

---

Don't forget about Touchdown Jesus, Jake Kumerow.
Davis cant stay healthy, 3 2nd year guys who may or may not make the jump, and Kumerow.
Adams and Allison.

By the end of training camp there will be plenty of room for Jordy..

Whatever Gutey decides, it's something to discuss.

JORDY! JORDY! JORDY!

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

---

They didn’t suck. But they weren’t Jordy. No receivers other than Davante stepped up this past year, that was pretty obvious.

---

I will never understand this weird obsession Packers fans have with bringing back former players. Under Ted Thompson's administration, their nostalgic wishes were (in my opinion) far too often granted, but it remains to be seen whether Brian Gutekunst will emulate Thompson's example.

I know it's popular in some circles to shit on Green Bay's receiving corps, but I think the Packers have a surfeit of riches at the receiver position. Even if they don't draft a wide receiver or two and/or a tight end in this year's draft -- which they do most years -- they're likely to part ways with Cobb and possibly one of the marginal youngsters. What is the point of bringing in an aging veteran to play WR2 or WR3? Sure, as long as he stays healthy, he'll be productive, but who is he going to take reps from? Not Jimmy Graham or Davante Adams, surely, so that means the young guys. That might give the offense a decent boost for a season -- assuming Matt LaFleur doesn't move to a more balanced offensive style -- but won't he be holding back the development of players still on their rookie contracts? And that's not getting into the fact that he'll be a hell of a lot more expensive than they are.

To me the negatives outweigh the positives.

---

Perhaps. The rookies certainly made their share of mistakes, but in plenty of instances, I don't think Aaron Rodgers was doing them any favors either.

---