nerdmann
5 years ago
The INT Kizer threw wasn't that bad, the one that was dropped was.

Still, overall I thought Kizer showed some good things. He needs a QB guru to develop him. He was making good reads all night, he was just out of sync with the WRs. That sort of timing would come in practice, if he was getting regular reps. He'd get that if he was playing regularly, so I'm not as worried about that.

He's not there yet, but I thought he looked like he was on his way.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
5 years ago
He may be better than Hundley but 16/35 for 132 yards isn't very impressive.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
Nerd, I can't argue with you, but I tired of settling for low expectations. He was rusty, but missed alot (if 12 missed that many you would have been all over his ass.)

I am also growing tired of the "out of sync" argument with any QB and any receiver. Run the frigging route and through the damn ball. Its not that complicated. Other teams do it with back up QB's and backup receivers. We can't and don't. Its largely because our system (hopefully our old system) sucks.

We settle too easily for mediocrity.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there is something about the guy I like, unlike Hundley. I never saw "it" in Hundley. Kizer seems poised and driven, and not afraid. Yes, he made some bad decisions, but, just like with 12 back there, I am not seeing guys running wide open. He really needs to improve his accuracy.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

He may be better than Hundley but 16/35 for 132 yards isn't very impressive.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I am pretty sure if you give me double my current arm strength, even at my advanced age, I am better than Brett Hundley.

I have no issue with however Deshonne Kizer played today. I missed it, because, of course, another damn Christmas party. You ever realize how free you are when you're single and don't gotta go to six different damn parties in December, plus work? My lord.

Anyhow, I'm just eager to see what the new coaching regime does in 2020. 2019 is gonna be a feeling out year.
UserPostedImage
5 years ago

He may be better than Hundley but 16/35 for 132 yards isn't very impressive.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


Better than Rodgers stats


DeShone Kizer 16/35-132 yds
Aaron Rodgers 3/5 26 yds
Rockmolder
5 years ago

Better than Rodgers stats


DeShone Kizer 16/35-132 yds
Aaron Rodgers 3/5 26 yds

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 



#Trade12 #Start9
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Better than Rodgers stats


DeShone Kizer 16/35-132 yds
Aaron Rodgers 3/5 26 yds

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 



How are you figuring Kizer stats were better than Rodgers?

Rodgers 66% completion 8.6 yards per reception 0 INT 73.8 rating
Kizer 45% completion 8.25 yards per reception 1 INT 44 rating

I suppose, Kizer did add 40 yards rushing on four carriers.
UserPostedImage
nyrpack
5 years ago
hes a backup , end of story, if aaron goes down the team goes down !!
jimmy b.
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

hes a backup , end of story, if aaron goes down the team goes down !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack 


Tell that to the 2017 and 2018 Philadelphia Eagles—or the 2015 Denver Broncos, for that matter. Sure, there's going to be a drop-off in production, but a team that has no chance of winning after its starting quarterback goes down is a poorly constructed team.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
5 years ago
This is great tete a tete, but I think we have move a bit off thread topic, i.e. Kizer. If he is not the guy, we need a guy like Gabbaert who has plenty of NFL reps, who wants a shot at title.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (19m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (19m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (20m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (27m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (28m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (48m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.