Aaron's New Offense· Page 2

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

6 years ago

Watching the 1st half, seems it's the same old offense.
Rodgers drops back misses the short route gets sacked.

The only difference is he had escaped a couple of times, snd the defense came up with a pick 6.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Bigbyfan
Member

6 years ago

#12

Watch other games besides the Packers. You'll see "inferior" teams complete passes with receivers that are wide open. Tell me the last time you watched a Packers game where receivers were consistently having yards of separation. The Packers offense has been outdated for a couple years now.

blank

nyrpack
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#13

i dont think its alot diffrerent from anytime during his career, the biggest difference is hes healthy and able to run just like the old days, the past 2 yrs hes been hurt !!

jimmy b.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

There were three times I saw guys completely wide open and Aaron didn't throw him the ball. Twice he was running in same direction as them, so I am assuming he saw them. Seeing the game live, it's far more frustrating because it is so much slower so it was like watching a car accident. COBB IS OPEN!! THROW THE FUCKING BALL!! And he would do the same damn thing I disliked about Brett Hundley, he would hesitate and pull it back, scramble a bit and then think about throwing and just toss it out of bounds. So damn frustrating.

He did have two really beautiful passes though. The pass he dropped into Cobb's hands for the TD, that was so pretty. The one to Adams where Alford was drapped over him, another really great pass.

For a California kid, sure didn't seem like the cold had much affect on him.

wpr
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

It's a big difference being at the game and watching it on tv. When it's the tv you only see a fraction of the field that they show you. When you are there you see so much more. I had to laugh when Cobb was open Aaron rolled his way but didn't throw him the ball even though there wasn't a defender nearby. 5,000 fans in the three sections in front of the play all jumped up screaming at Aaron to get the ball to Cobb. Reluctantly he did but it took 3 times as long as it should have. By then a defender came over to cover Cobb. Instead of giving him the chance for YAC he was tackled immediately. But it was still a first down. Aaron and his damn statwhoring.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#16

Here's one of the passes I really liked.

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#17

We're going to get a glimpse of the future today.

I'm expecting something similar to the Tom Clements debacle. But I hope I'm wrong. Could go either way.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

If that's the future, it looked pretty good, but overall I think you're wrong... I don't think that has anything to do with the future... and your conspiracy theories of a power controlling Rodgers seemed quite wrong too...

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan

Right on, and I can't believe some can't see that (or they're ignoring it) and trying to put all the blame on the OL... Rodgers has even openly said it, it's not the OL, it's the WRs not getting open. Though to be fair, sometimes the WRs do get open and Rodgers doesn't pull the trigger because he's not comfortable with something or is looking for a longer/bigger play. But it's certainly not just the OL... which might have been one of the Packers best offensive groups this season.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#18

On the one hand, I applaud Philbin's determination to bring a new sense of urgency to the offense. On the other hand, I can't help but note that he has been the offensive coordinator all season and wonder why he hasn't found a way to implement this look on a constitent basis until now. Somehow I doubt that Mike McCarthy was insisting that Aaron Rodgers wait until time expired to get the play off. Though the commentators yesterday did seem to think Philbin was getting the play in faster than McCarthy was wont to do.

Or was it that Rodgers was simply futzing less with the play prior to the snap?

packerfanoutwest
Member

6 years ago

#19

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Another difference......How many shoestring passes were there Sunday? Zero, nothing even close. Which may make one wonder why? Yeah, they did play with more "energy", was this because Mike McCarthy was finally relieved of his duties?

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#20

It was Rodgers that said Joe was getting the call in quicker to him

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (51m) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (56m) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (1h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (1h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (1h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (1h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (2h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (2h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (5h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (12h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (13h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (20h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (21h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS