haha · PACKERSHOME

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

I still have to laugh when I think of the QB situation with the Lions, Vikings and Bears. We've had our QB position solidified since the early '90's and continues to be solid after our Legend retired.

Just had to throw that out there, again. 😃

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Well Zero i hope after the draft the Lions and us are the only teams set for the next few years, but i still fear where Cutler can end up. Detroit will either end up with Cutler or Stafford which won't be bad for them but i sure as hell don't want the Lions with Stafford and the Bears or Vikes get Cutler.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

Why would a Green Bay Packers fan want the Detroit Lions to be set for QB for a few years?

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

I meant it as saying we know the Lions will get a qb for the future this year, i'm hoping the vikes or Bears don't get one also.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

I meant it as saying we know the Lions will get a qb for the future this year, i'm hoping the vikes or Bears don't get one also.

"dhazer" wrote:

But ... there isn't any solid QB coming out this year ... They're still foobed man.

doddpower
Veteran Member

15 years ago

I meant it as saying we know the Lions will get a qb for the future this year, i'm hoping the vikes or Bears don't get one also.

"dhazer" wrote:

How would you know that any draft pick would be their "quarterback for the future" without seeing them play for 3-4 years minimum? You don't really accept Rodger's as our quarterback of the future because he hasn't proven it for 3-4 years. So, just because the Lions might draft a quarterback, by your logic, that doesn't mean they have a quarterback for the future at all.

Just saying.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

Fact is.........you don't know till the QB proves either way.
Jeff George, Todd Marinovich, Andre Ware, and the list could go on and on were supposed to be "can't miss" QB's. Well,.......they MISSED!
Then again, some later round guys have shown to be great. So who really knows, till it happens? Aaron Rodgers could have crashed and burned last season, but thankfully for us, he didn't. I think he has the talent. He just needs an O-line that can give him at least a LITTLE time, and a running game that can keep the other D guessing.

vikesrule
Registered

15 years ago

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

6-10

bavpb
Registered

15 years ago

6-10

"vikesrule" wrote:

= - 4

That was easy! :brilsmurf:

Have a nice day,
Harald

It was a tight game, and it swayed back and forth. And sure enough, he pulled out a victory at the end...
I swear to you, he smiled while he was doing it. He smiled til the end.
We’ll miss you, gunslinger.

vikesrule
Registered

15 years ago

#10

6-10

"bavpb" wrote:

= - 4

That was easy! :brilsmurf:

Have a nice day,
Harald

"vikesrule" wrote:

Very good Harald, you old Bavarian cheesehead!

You got it!

6 - 10 is because of "minus number 4"

:sign5:

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (31m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (31m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (32m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (39m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (40m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS