Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago
Ty was actually my favorite offensive player on the field.

... First it was Jordy and then Ty. He reminded me of a muscular cobb, good slot receiver and could break tackles. Notice I said receiver and not RB. I never liked him at RB ... only time I did was if they would use him as a scat back but he still wasnt that effective because I think the defenses knew what he would be doing.

I thought he brought a lot of physicality to the receiver position. Same like jordy did.

Im not even sure what happened this past sunday; is it just hearsay about the fit and he did the run back out of spite or what ... I hate to say it but perhaps rodgers was so upset that Mike McCarthy decided in order to keep a 'happy' rodgers he needed to get rid of ty.

As someone else pointed out reminds me of the bostick situation. Except bostick was a below average TE and Ty was a #2-#3 WR (not RB).

Alls I can say is the ravens got a nice deal for Ty - a theoretically 8th round pick for him. Be interesting to see how he does over there and at what position.

Even thou I was Really disappointed by the ending of the game on sunday; Im sad to see Ty go; I wish him luck in the future.
Zero2Cool
6 years ago
Packers did a disservice to Ty by moving him to RB, well, the disservice was keeping him there after he filled the gap for us.

We have topics that explain what happened Sunday. Ty admitted he was upset on the sideline, no different than other players. I don't think this had anything to do with Aaron Rodgers being kept happy. Again, in another topic, We posted quotes from Ty where he said he didn't know who he could trust. Football is the ultimate team sport, you don't have trust to the guy next to you, you have nothing. In addition to that, the comments with Ty saying he scarified money, that he still doesn't know his role on the team and his reasoning for returning the kick ... all in all, Ty needed a change more than the Packers needed Ty gone.

This is just my opinion. Ty is a good dude, really good dude, but Packers shafted him when they didn't put him back to WR after we drafted three RB's. I have full confidence Ty is going to excel with the Ravens. If he can stop fumbling the ball. I believe he also fumbled in preseason, and vs Bills and had another fumble in the Rams game that I think it was Bulaga that recovered it and the broadcast team didn't say anything about.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
6 years ago

I have full confidence Ty is going to excel with the Ravens. If

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Me too... if they use him more intelligently than we have since he was moved to RB. If they just use him as a vanilla RB he's going to run into a lot of the same problems.
Zero2Cool
6 years ago
At least Ty is consistent. This time though, no one was there to tackle his ass lol


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago
Bring back Devante Mays! Let's see what he's got.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Dulak
  • Dulak
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

At least Ty is consistent. This time though, no one was there to tackle his ass lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



got to admit that was a good one - wish that was sundays game
DoddPower
6 years ago
Ty Montgomery sucked. At least as a RB. People were blinded by his few game stretch where he found success. He was never going to be a good running back for the Packers. He's too slow and overall average at best. Could he have more success as a WR? I don't know. But I doubt it. He's simply too slow and not shifty enough. I doubt he'll ever be anything more than a fringe depth player. Considering the situation with the Packers, I'm glad he's gone. I hoped he would have been cut, so getting anything for him is a bonus.
beast
6 years ago

Ty Montgomery sucked. At least as a RB. People were blinded by his few game stretch where he found success. He was never going to be a good running back for the Packers. He's too slow and overall average at best.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Monty sucked once he put the additional weight on... in the first offseason after being switched to RB... but that first year he was quick and could avoid people, and if he could of made one more miss he'd often be off to the races... I thought added more weight would hurt and make it even harder to avoid guys... and it really did't give him more power.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago

Ty Montgomery sucked. At least as a RB. People were blinded by his few game stretch where he found success. He was never going to be a good running back for the Packers. He's too slow and overall average at best. Could he have more success as a WR? I don't know. But I doubt it. He's simply too slow and not shifty enough. I doubt he'll ever be anything more than a fringe depth player. Considering the situation with the Packers, I'm glad he's gone. I hoped he would have been cut, so getting anything for him is a bonus.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I liked him.

He just wasn't as good as Aaron Jones. Then you got those young WRs taking his place there too.

He did sacrifice for the team by making the transition, but damn dude. Hold it together.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
6 years ago
He sure seemed slow coming out of the end zone. Why they even put a slow poke in that position is beyond me.
Why not put one of your speed guys out there?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (37m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (37m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (51m) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (53m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (54m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (54m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (55m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (59m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (59m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (1h) : Packers will get in
beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.