Zero2Cool
6 years ago
Sit his as on injured reserve and get high picks.

Packers QB Aaron Rodgers could be getting his top three receivers back for Monday's game against the 49ers. But following a setback last week, Rodgers is hoping to avoid going back to the bulky knee brace he used in the early part of the season.

Continue Reading @ ESPN 

ESPN wrote:





Edit: to avoid confusion, my post comment here is facetiously based.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago
If he's not gonna execute the offense, maybe he should take a seat.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
go.pack.go.
6 years ago
Rodgers “not executing” the offense is 100 times better than Kizer “executing” the offense.
UserPostedImage
Bigbyfan
6 years ago
Don't wanna sound like I'm attacking either of you, because I definitely respect both Zero and Nerd, but people really gotta stop overreacting this early in the season...

Do the Packers look great right now? No. However, you can make an argument that every game they've lost or tied is the Packers fault, not the other team totally over matching them.

Tie against the Vikings - Obviously the bullshit roughing the passer call cost the game, yet they still had an opportunity to win at the end with a missed field goal at the end of regulation... Packers should've won

Loss against the Redskins - Randall Cobb single handedly ended four drives. Dropped pass on third down, dropped pass on 4th down, ran the wrong route on third down, and lost a fumble... Packers should've won

Loss against the Lions - Obviously Mason Crosby's 4 missed field goals and 1 missed extra point. Add in two Rodgers fumbles and a bullshit punt call that gave the Lions three short fields to score... Packers could've won.

Are the Packers as good as I hoped? No. However, they're nowhere as bad as people are making them out to be... The Packers have the talent to be a contender, it's just a lack of execution that lost us these games.

The fact that it's the Packers miscues that are costing us games should be at least a little encouraging. (Yes I'm a glass half full fan) Only because not one team has legitimately outplayed the Packers this year. That should at least give us fans some hope that we have not seen the best that the Packers have to offer yet...

I'm not gonna jump off the bandwagon just yet... I still have hope... It hasn't even been half the season yet
blank
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Don't wanna sound like I'm attacking either of you, because I definitely respect both Zero and Nerd, but people really gotta stop overreacting this early in the season...

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



You're not attacking, you're not understanding, that's all. Aaron needs to be a better leader. Players are playing too tight and that's on him. WR need to earn his trust. WR get shit reactions from him. Fans wanna whine and bitch about how whomever the GM isn't doing enough for Aaron. No, it is time for Aaron to take charge and be the leader THIS team needs him to be.

If you can't see that, that's fine. I hold no ill will, but bottom line, that is the problem with this team. We play tight and without discipline. Playing tight is on Aaron. Playing without discipline is on Mike McCarthy.

But hey, I'm sure we should all just blame Ted Thompson because wow, that's the cool thing to do! (not saying you're blaming Ted Thompson, but a plethora of others STILL bitch about him)
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
6 years ago

You're not attacking, you're not understanding, that's all. Aaron needs to be a better leader. Players are playing too tight and that's on him. WR need to earn his trust. WR get shit reactions from him. Fans wanna whine and bitch about how whomever the GM isn't doing enough for Aaron. No, it is time for Aaron to take charge and be the leader THIS team needs him to be.

If you can't see that, that's fine. I hold no ill will, but bottom line, that is the problem with this team. We play tight and without discipline. Playing tight is on Aaron. Playing without discipline is on Mike McCarthy.

But hey, I'm sure we should all just blame Ted Thompson because wow, that's the cool thing to do! (not saying you're blaming Ted Thompson, but a plethora of others STILL bitch about him)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



For me, there also is the fact that Rodgers just signed a huge contract extension. I am not really happy that management did that without seeing how he was able to play after the collar bone injury. Dude immediately almost gets another season ending injury with his knee. Some people say that the team has only Aaron and then a bunch of journeymen. I don't really agree with that but, if that is the case, it is a shitty self fulfilling prophecy that the new GM (and Aaron) should be partially blamed for. Also, screw TT.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Zero2Cool
6 years ago
Good thing he had a brace.

UserPostedImage
Porforis
6 years ago

You're not attacking, you're not understanding, that's all. Aaron needs to be a better leader. Players are playing too tight and that's on him. WR need to earn his trust.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



As I went into extensive detail with in another thread, Aaron does NOT lock in to 1 or 2 guys, and certainly not more than any other QB does. This narrative that you get ignored until you magically earn Aaron's trust and if you drop a pass or two you're back in the doghouse forever and Aaron will just ignore you is tired, old, and inaccurate and I would challenge you to back up that assertions with facts. Not a few single game anecdotes or a "HERE'S A FEW PICTURES OF WHERE THERE WAS A GUY OPEN AND HE DIDN'T THROW THE BALL TO HIM" but with actual statistics that show that Aaron Rodgers, more than most quarterbacks, ignores people he doesn't 'trust'. Not saying I'm 100% correct here, as I've only gone through a couple seasons worth of data and I haven't been able to find leaugewide statistics and I'm not going to spend hours manually compiling that myself, especially after my post was completely ignored the first time after spending about 30 minutes on it.

Here it is again. Read it. React. Come back with something tangible to counter with, not a gut feeling or a collection of visual anecdotes or quotes from players or coaches spoken to a story-hungry media. Confirmation bias is a bitch.

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m402217-At-least-two-of-the-Packers--rookie-wide-receivers-look-promising#post402217 
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

As I went into extensive detail with in another thread, Aaron does NOT lock in to 1 or 2 guys, and certainly not more than any other QB does.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

I agree with you that Aaron Rodgers does not lock into one or two guys anymore than other QB's.

This narrative that you get ignored until you magically earn Aaron's trust and if you drop a pass or two you're back in the doghouse forever and Aaron will just ignore you is tired, old, and inaccurate and I would challenge you to back up that assertions with facts.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 


What narrative? The one you just magically created to attack me with? Then get cute with challenging me for facts to support your magically created narrative? I won't because, well, it's not a narrative I believe to be true.

Not a few single game anecdotes or a "HERE'S A FEW PICTURES OF WHERE THERE WAS A GUY OPEN AND HE DIDN'T THROW THE BALL TO HIM" but with actual statistics that show that Aaron Rodgers, more than most quarterbacks, ignores people he doesn't 'trust'.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 


I'm not sure where this magically created narrative came from, but since you're attacking me, I'll add my two cents. I do believe Aaron passes up shallow open guys and goes deep at times. However, I cannot say I see in a REPLAY (usually in slow motion) that the QB should have seen the same thing. The thing about playing QB is you have progressions, you have reads, you have counter-reads and you also play the eye game, which means looking the Safety off. You mix that with being pressured and it's easy to miss an open guy. I take all of that into consideration when I believe Aaron passed up an open guy.

Not saying I'm 100% correct here,

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

I am saying you are 100% wrong for this attack based on your false narrative.

as I've only gone through a couple seasons worth of data and I haven't been able to find leaugewide statistics and I'm not going to spend hours manually compiling that myself, especially after my post was completely ignored the first time after spending about 30 minutes on it.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

The one you linked to, I saw it and saw you were responding to Rourke. I'm not sure what you were expecting from me.

Here it is again. Read it. React. Come back with something tangible to counter with, not a gut feeling or a collection of visual anecdotes or quotes from players or coaches spoken to a story-hungry media. Confirmation bias is a bitch.

http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m402217-At-least-two-of-the-Packers--rookie-wide-receivers-look-promising#post402217 

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

Why are you telling me to read it? What reaction do you want from me? It's not something I disagree with or even have argued against. This whole attack is so bogus and absurdly wrong.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
6 years ago
I think you're taking things way too personally here. If I fucked up and assume things, it's because I fucked up and assumed things, not because I think you're a jerk or I'm trying to be a jerk or anything to do with you.

You said, verbatim:

WR need to earn his trust.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



If what you meant by that was not "Aaron locks in on guys that he trusts, and this is a thing that not literally every other quarterback does" and/or "You get ignored until you earn Aaron's trust", then please explain what you meant. I'm sorry if I was assuming things here, but it is an extremely, extremely common narrative by about a dozen people on this forum, in the media, and widespread among the fanbase that Aaron forces the balls to his favorite players and ignores people that are wide open until he "builds trust with that receiver". If I inaccurately pinned these views on you, that's my bad. But it's really hard to tell exactly what you meant from six words of explanation. And I'd like to know what you meant.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (3h) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (9h) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (19h) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (19h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (20h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (20h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (21h) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (22h) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (22h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Around The NFL / beast

4h / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.