Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
6 years ago
Alexander’s talent projects nicely to his potential to become a solid NFL CB. Watching him 2 yards off LOS and beginning his track of Mike Williams [#7 pick in ‘17] with flat feet and seeing him smoothly flip and run stride for stride like he’s Williams’ shadow with the sun at 12 o’clock is a thing of beauty.

In the ’17 Syracuse game he lined-up across from Sr. WR Steven Ishmael. Ishmael was a nice college WR [Set a bunch of team records], but did not get drafted. Ishmael is 6-2, 212 and ran a 4.59 at combine and the Exchange had him rated as #46 WR. He recently signed with INDY as an UDFA. Statistically, Jaire gave up 1 catch for 8 yards; but in 4 plays [at 1:00, at 1:25 a 2:03 and 4:06 in this VIDEO ] Jaire had mediocre to poor coverage that would have seen Jaire give up 5 catches 150 yards and a TD if the QB play was better. On these 4 plays Jaire was poor or lazy with his technique: coming out of back-pedal too fast; opened up his hips too soon; lunging on a double move slowing his recovery; and taking long loping strides running back on an “angle” instead of shorter piston steps. In the Syracuse game and many others Jaire’s technique, like the play described above against Williams, was lazy to poor. However, because of the athletic disparity between Alexander and mostly WRs that have no hope of playing Sundays, Alexander was able to recover. Many of Alexander’s “signature plays,” like making an INT in man coverage in RZ against 2016 #7 pick Williams resulted from poor QB play. Williams broke on a short IN leaving Alexander 3 yards behind, Deshaun Watson threw way behind Williams and Jaire was able to close and INT.

Fact is, the Jaire exemplified by the college “tape” reviewed is simply incapable of playing in the NFL. Qualification for the more emotional: Jaire’s situation describes 99% of the college players drafted including Denzel Ward.

Outside of staying healthy, there is one thing and one thing alone will determine whether Jaire ends up a bust or selling ocean-view real estate on “Jaire Island:” his ability and want to take coaching. Trea Wayens has more athleticism and talent in his baby finger than Richard Sherman has in his entire body; yet Wayens rides the pines and Sherman is a perennial pro-bowler. This proves that a draftee’s mental aptitude is the single most important variable to determine if a kid is going to make it.

The trade-up for Jaire proved he was a long-planned target. He was not an afterthought occurring when all of GB’s targets were taken and a trade-down failed to presented itself. However, according to Nagler, who claims to know Jaire’s agent [John Thornton] very well, GB’s pick of him was a 100% total surprise, they had no idea GB was interested.

Prospects usually know which teams are sniffing. The prospect might get a call, for example, from their HS coach and/or present or past position coaches informing them that GB made contact. Scouts will spend extra time at events and all-star games and visit with the prospect multiple times on campus, etc. Much of this extra work is done after the scheduled season is over, which Jaire short-circuited this process by quitting before the bowl game and hiring an agent 2 weeks later. This made him ineligible for all-star games and all visits were scheduled thru the agent as opposed to scouts showing up on campus after speaking to someone at the university. This agent would have known just about everything concerning GB’s interest and there appeared to be none.

Gutekunst could have had this kid for an ENTIRE day on a visit. GB usually sends flunkies to pick up visiting players at the airport, would Jaire act like a douchebag and suddenly Eddie-Haskell-it once arriving at the complex? The agents know about and will warn about this “trick,” but ya gotta imagine there’s a ton of creative ways to learn how a kid acts when he thinks no one is watching. A ton could have been learned about this kid’s character with 2-3-4-5 campus visits or grabbing him in the hallway a couple of times for 5 minutes at the combine or just having a meal with him and talking about the mundane. I suspect Gutekunst strategized to sacrifice learning as much as possible about this kid as a subterfuge to GB’s actual interest.

A team possesses a legitimate interest in concealing their interest in a player; however, it is patently reckless to sacrifice every single extra critical opportunity to learn the most important things about a prospect. This was a huge mistake that should not be repeated.
Zero2Cool
6 years ago
Somehow, someway, I've already grown tired of someones constant bullshit about this regime and sadly enough, this regime hasn't even given us a training camp. Narrow minded arrogant bullshit constantly spewed. What a waste of time.

Oh, to answer the topic question. NO, they didn't go too far with secrecy. Unreal the depth we're willing to go to bitch about things.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
6 years ago
What interests me is Burks. I think he's the biggest secret/mystery. If there was a pick where we specifically went up to get a guy, it was Oren Burks. This guy is the new inside linebacker. He can rush, defend against the run, move sideline to sideline insanely fast, and is quite competent out in coverage (has work at safety in his resume). Will he live up to the trade up and his potential? That will be a guy I'll be watching closely.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
nerdmann
6 years ago
One might suggest the Packers screwed up on Demarious Randall as well. Dude turned out to be a bit of a head case. But we got some good coverage out of him, then traded him for equivalent value.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

One might suggest the Packers screwed up on Demarious Randall as well. Dude turned out to be a bit of a head case. But we got some good coverage out of him, then traded him for equivalent value.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



BREAKING NEWS!
Humans make mistakes!!

Twitter goes wild! Facebook can't handle THIS!!

Sorry, just a little fed up with all bashing and slights. We have 11 new kids who want nothing more than to make the 2018 Packers gooder and we're wasting time with this shit.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
6 years ago
First thread it was too much talking, now it's too much secrecy. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't with you.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

First thread it was too much talking, now it's too much secrecy. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't with you.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



Well if you hate the dude it doesn't matter what he does. You still hate him. 🙄
If Goot is lucky enough to real in 3 SBs some will ask why he didn't get 4 or 5.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago
I think Barnfarn is taking secrecy too far with failure to express his self esteem issues.

Why else would he keep writing long as hell, complete bullshit articles? Even clearly contradicting himself!

First thread it was too much talking, now it's too much secrecy. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't with you.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



I'm serious... this is a change in Barnfarn correct? Or is this normal? If it's a change, then I'm seriously wondering what's wrong or what changed him.

UserPostedImage
Bigbyfan
6 years ago
Wow.... You must be a real pleasure to be around in real life.
blank
Smokey
6 years ago

What interests me is Burks. I think he's the biggest secret/mystery. If there was a pick where we specifically went up to get a guy, it was Oren Burks. This guy is the new inside linebacker. He can rush, defend against the run, move sideline to sideline insanely fast, and is quite competent out in coverage (has work at safety in his resume). Will he live up to the trade up and his potential? That will be a guy I'll be watching closely.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



I don't know a lot about Burks either. He does have youth, speed, and at 6'3" he has good height. He can and most likely will add 10 to 15 lbs of muscle to his already 233 lb weight.

I expect to see him on Special Teams for his 1st season as he learns and bulks up some. I don't see him challenging for a starting spot, but others like Biegel had better be ready to challenge Ryan for his ILB spot.

Burks could be a starter by the 2019 Season.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.