Jordy Nelson cut by Packers· Page 2

warhawk
Senior Member

6 years ago

Something got to give. Sometimes the business side of this game sucks but it cannot be ignored.
Losing a step to age and injury made Jordy expendable no longer being the outside/deep threat he once brought to the table. Cobb and Ty can handle the slot.
I have to believe bringing in Graham and letting Jordy go has something to do with the new offensive playbook being installed.
Hey, Adams on one side, Cobb in the slot, Ty coming out of the backfield, and Graham from the TE position. Who's going to stop that with 12 back there?

"The train is leaving the station."

Porforis
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#12

Adams on one side, Cobb in the slot, Ty coming out of the backfield, and Graham from the TE position. Who's going to stop that with 12 back there?

Originally Posted by: warhawk

If we had consistent problems getting separation last year, is replacing Nelson with Graham really going to help that much?

isocleas2
Member

6 years ago

#13

Still a lot of off-season left would be surprised if a WR1 wasn't drafted early and/or signed in free agency.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#14

Graham is not replacing Jordy. That's not his job. He's a tight end. Let him be judged against other tight ends.

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

sschind
Senior Member

6 years ago

#15

Maybe they resign him to a lower deal? Kinda like what they did with AJ Hawk a few years back.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan

Put ty Montgomery back at wr

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Gute's comments didn't sound to me like he was too interested in bringing him back. Could happen though. I hope he goes to an AFC team and is instrumental in leading his team to the Super Bowl where they promptly lose to his old team.

nerdmann
Premier Member

6 years ago

#16

Think Cobb will take a pay cut?

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

DoddPower
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#17

Who's going to stop that with 12 back there?

Originally Posted by: warhawk

🇲🇲

Smokey
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#18

Releasing Nelson, while not popular with some, is IMO in the best interest of the team. He deserves our thanks and best wishes for the future.

Now, go sign Jimmy Graham for TE. BG may still need to draft a TE as Graham is not the best run blocker. Also there should be a few two TE plays in the new playbook.

Next, go with Adams the WR1, move Montgomery to WR3 (the slot receiver) and if BG can get Allen Robinson foe the WR2 then GB will have sweet starting WR core. Cobb can be traded as necessary to get Robinson or in a deal to get an above average CB.

Adams (WR1), Graham(TE), Montgomery(WR3), and Robinson(WR2)

Rodgers(QB)
Jones / Williams(RBs)

It would work for me.
[cheers]

blueleopard
Member

6 years ago

#19

We have Graham.

Robinson is gonna be a Bear.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

6 years ago

#20

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

bboystyle (7m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (16m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (37m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (45m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (57m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS