gotarace
7 years ago

$12.75 is the cap hit, NOT the dollar amount... $3.25 of that cap hit is signing bonus which Cobb is getting/keeping, either way.

So Cobb's 2018 dollar amount is $9.5 million.

Originally Posted by: beast 



https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/green-bay-packers/ 
Click on the 2018 tab and see for yourself...
Smart As a Horse
Hung Like Einstein
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/green-bay-packers/
Click on the 2018 tab and see for yourself...

Originally Posted by: gotarace 



I like this link more gooder.
http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t26576-2018-Cap-Freedom 
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/green-bay-packers/
Click on the 2018 tab and see for yourself...

Originally Posted by: gotarace 



I like this link more gooder.
http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/t26576-2018-Cap-Freedom 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I'll take either, as they both agree with what I said.
$12.75 million is the cap hit
$3.25 million is the dead cap / sunk cost from the signing bonus
$9.5 million is the difference and amount that Cobb can gain in 2018 (if he plays under that contract)
UserPostedImage
sschind
7 years ago
Fans have been talking about how good the Packers WR corps is for years now but once again I think it could be a major question mark. Especially if we don't resign Adams. I get the whole concussion issue worries but that won't stop some team from offering him a lot of money. More the Alshon Jeffery got? Maybe, maybe not but it will be somewhere in that range. Is he worth it, again, maybe maybe not but IMO he is currently the best WR the Packers have and if they do not resign him they will go into 2018 with some major questions not unlike the past 4 or 5 seasons.

Without DA you have an aging Jordy Nelson, a disappearing Randall Cobb and, just like in years past, a bunch of potential. Only the last few years that potential included Davante Adams,.

I love Jordy Nelson and I think he can still be a very effective pro bowl caliber WR, just not the outside guy he has been and partially because of AR. With him throwing the ball any of our WRs have pro bowl potential. Move Jordy to the slot and take advantage of his route running ability. I also like Randall Cobb a lot and I think he could be very productive as well but if JN moves to the slot what do you do with RC. Plus there is the cap thing with both of them.

The rest of the WRs on the roster do not instill the kind of hope I would like to see. The kind of potential I thought we had when DA was one of those guys.

Montgomery could be a wildcard at the position but after going through all the trouble to switch him to RB I don't know if they would switch him back.

Contrary to popular belief I do think we could resign Adams and keep Nelson and Cobb. Adams 2018 cap hit could be limited by giving him a low salary. It happens all the time with big 2nd contracts because of the signing bonus. Extend Jordy and convert some of his 2018 salary to a signing bonus which would lower his cap hit in 2018 and let RC play out his contract . He (RC) is still young enough to play his heart out in 2018 gunning for another big payday in 2019 so if he does and prices himself out of the Packers range so be it. I don't know if he would be as amenable as Jordy to the same sort of restructure simply because of his age. He may just want to play out his deal and let the chips fall where they may.

beast
7 years ago

Fans have been talking about how good the Packers WR corps is for years now but once again I think it could be a major question mark. Especially if we don't resign Adams. I get the whole concussion issue worries but that won't stop some team from offering him a lot of money. More the Alshon Jeffery got? Maybe, maybe not but it will be somewhere in that range. Is he worth it, again, maybe maybe not but IMO he is currently the best WR the Packers have and if they do not resign him they will go into 2018 with some major questions not unlike the past 4 or 5 seasons.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I agree, I have felt like the Packers WRs are over rated due to hype... and the Packers starting OTs (when healthy) have been underrated. Packers have gotten by more with good quantity (and pick the match-up you like) more than great quality, anyone surely gonna win.

Though I really dislike the Jeffery comparisons... he got $13 million per year. I'm thinking Adams needs to be around $11.5 million per year (or less)... if there demand is around $12 million per year (or higher), then the Packers need to look into other options (and there are some other interesting young WR options that might be getting to FA).

Also I believe it was rumored the Dolphins (with the Philbin as head coach at the time) offered Cobb about $12 million per year (at least for the first 3 years or something) and he decided to stay with the Packers even though they only would offer $10 million per year.


Montgomery could be a wildcard at the position but after going through all the trouble to switch him to RB I don't know if they would switch him back.

Contrary to popular belief I do think we could resign Adams and keep Nelson and Cobb. Adams 2018 cap hit could be limited by giving him a low salary. It happens all the time with big 2nd contracts because of the signing bonus. Extend Jordy and convert some of his 2018 salary to a signing bonus which would lower his cap hit in 2018.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I think they keep Montgomery at RB, because MM has some tricks to use him as a receiver getting a LB or S on him for a favorite match-up, if they keep him at RB. It was harder to do that this year, because the OL injuries early in the season, and then Monty and Rodgers got injured.

I think they could keep all 3 too... I just think it might be hard on the salary cap... though I read something about the Packers could potentially be with the 6th most salary cap space? .... though I think that was implying if they cut their over prices vets.

Yes Adam's cap hit of all players is towards the end if you're just talking about a normal contract... if your talking about purposely doing more so even more than normal is on the end, sorta like you're talking about with Nelson, then I don't like those cap tricks. While they're great for opening cap space now... they're horrible for cap space later and lots of teams (including the Packers under Sherman) have gotten into tight cap problems doing things like that.
UserPostedImage
sschind
7 years ago



I think they could keep all 3 too... I just think it might be hard on the salary cap... though I read something about the Packers could potentially be with the 6th most salary cap space? .... though I think that was implying if they cut their over prices vets.

Yes Adam's cap hit of all players is towards the end if you're just talking about a normal contract... if your talking about purposely doing more so even more than normal is on the end, sorta like you're talking about with Nelson, then I don't like those cap tricks. While they're great for opening cap space now... they're horrible for cap space later and lots of teams (including the Packers under Sherman) have gotten into tight cap problems doing things like that.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I'm not saying a huge back loaded deal that will mean a certain cut in the last year or two because of a high guaranteed salary. I don't like those deals either, a 5 year deal that is really a 3 year deal because it calls for a 20 million dollar salary in year 4 or 5 and we know the guy will be cut before then and all the signing bonus is escalated. With the way the cap is a shrewd GM shouldn't have a problem with a 4 year 48 million per (average) if they work it right. Fans see that and think no way can they afford a 12 million dollar cap hit next year and still keep Nelson and Cobb. If they make 18 million of it a signing bonus and give him a 1.5 million dollar salary in the first year that means his 2018 cap hit would only be 6 million. Then they give him a salary of 8 million in year 2 (cap hit 12.5 but Cobb could be gone) 9.5 in year 3 (cap of 14) 12 in year 4 (cap 16.5) Year 4 looks tough but if they decide to part way its only 4.5 million dead money and if he keeps getting better he will be a bargain by then.

when you are looking at a contract like Nelson has you have three options. Stand pat and take the big cap hit. Cut him and take the lesser dead money hit but if you do that you have to add the cost of his replacement into the dead money so if you cut him to save 9 million and sign someone for 6 million you are really only saving 3 so you have to ask is Jordy Nelson worth 3 million over someone else. I'm not saying yes or no just that you have to factor that in. Or option three, if you would like to keep him around, convert some of his guaranteed money (he is going to get it anyway and it is going to count against the cap eventually) to bonus and spread the cap hit out.

just spitballing numbers here and going from memory but say you convert 8 million of his 9 million 2018 salary to a signing bonus and give him 3 more years. That gives him a 1 million salary this year plus 2.75 (roughly)in new bonus hit and what, 3 million hit from the last bonus for a total hit of about 6-7. A savings of 6-7 million Now for new money you give him 3 million next year, 4 the next and 5 after that. Cap hits will be around 6, 7 and 8 million respectively but dead money will be 9, 6 and 3. if you think he can be productive for another three years after next year you have a cheap #2 WR and if not your dead money is not much more than it is now after 2 more years.

I just looked and Jeffrey only got a 6.25 million signing bonus so the cap hits for that for the next 4 years are only 1.25 million per year for that part and the dead money isn't that bad but his salary is almost 12, 13 13. His cap hit for 2018 even with his new deal is under 5 million but it jumps to almost 15 in 2019 because if the high salary and low signing bonus. They also added some option bonuses in there which seems to be sort of a compromise between a signing bonus and salary. I am not sure exactly how that counts if he ever gets cut.

The sort of deal I am talking about for Adams works best if they are trying to also keep Cobb and Nelson. If they plan on moving on from one or both of them then yeah, cut the bonus, give him more salary next year and make the dead money lower on the back end. Like I said my numbers are very rough but it should give you an idea on how it could be done. I am with you though in that i generally don't like back loaded contracts.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (47m) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (47m) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (49m) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (53m) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (55m) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (55m) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (58m) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (59m) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (1h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (1h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (1h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (3h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (3h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (3h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (1-Apr) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.