Fake Games: Determined by Bullshit· Page 2

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

We should have been up by 3 TDs in the third quarter, but what's up with the non-call on the helmet to helmet against Hundley that last drive?

Let the PLAYERS determine the outcome of games.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

So Packers should have all the points, and the other team should have none of the points?

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#12

So Packers should have all the points, and the other team should have none of the points?

Originally Posted by: beast

Goodell should pay more than lip service to integrity of the game.

But like I said, we got NOTHING out of 3 turnovers.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#13

They were both tangled up on that play.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Really not sure what you were looking at then.There was no tangling involved. They both had hands on eachother which happens on just about every play, but nobody was pushing and grabbing, twisting, etc. But when the ball got close, Adams clearly pushed off extending his arm and pushing the defender back a yard or two before jumping up to try to get the ball (which was overthrown).

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#14

Goodell should pay more than lip service to integrity of the game.

But like I said, we got NOTHING out of 3 turnovers.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

So wait, did the players determine the outcome of the game or not? Did the Packers have many, many opportunities to make plays and not execute? Or did the offense just play perfectly after getting the ball back with favorable field position and just got robbed by the refs on 1st, 2nd, and then 3rd down every drive and the Packers should have won by double digits?

packerfanoutwest
Member

7 years ago

#15

57 yd fg try..nuff said.......fire him!

steveishere
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#16

Goodell should pay more than lip service to integrity of the game.

But like I said, we got NOTHING out of 3 turnovers.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Got a TD off the 1st turnover and on the 2nd had a shot at a legit FG if McCarthy didn't stop running the ball and Hundley doesn't sack himself out of FG range. 3rd turnover we had the ball at the 34 so not really any different than forcing a punt. You aren't going to win many games with a back up QB if you give up 31 points on the road.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#17

So wait, did the players determine the outcome of the game or not? Did the Packers have many, many opportunities to make plays and not execute? Or did they play to the best of their ability and got repeatedly robbed by the refs of multiple TDs and the Packers should have won by double digits?

Originally Posted by: Porforis

They SHOULD have been ahead by 3 TDs, but they weren't. Then you get the crucial non call.

I agree, sometimes WE get the call/non call. My point is, I'd rather have a real game, determined by the players.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

hardrocker950
Member

7 years ago

#18

And Davante Adams blatantly pushed off on the last TD drive which wasn't called. Packers get away with calls all the time. So do other teams. So do you want them to throw flags for everything or not?

Originally Posted by: Porforis

This is true, every team gets away with a few. That said - the hit on Hundley was blatent as hell and should have been flagged. This agenda of protecting players is being pressed so hard, yet they let that one go. That ignored penalty doesn't sit well with me.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#19

Originally Posted by: Porforis

The ball was probably rules uncatchable. However, the way I saw it, was that it was uncatchable, because Adam's route was disrupted by the defender. Adams pushed the defender off of himself as the ball sailed past.

But yeah man. As I've said before, call it fair both ways. Let the players determine the outcome.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: hardrocker950

On what are you basing the assumption that it was a conscious decision to not throw a flag on that play as opposed to the referee in question not seeing the contact?

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (26m) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (6h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (6h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (8h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (14h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS