uffda udfa
7 years ago
Kudos to Tom "ultra-soft" Silverstein for this one:

GREEN BAY – There are only two conclusions you can make after the Green Bay Packers’ abysmal failure to launch a passing attack Sunday at Lambeau Field.

Either coach Mike McCarthy and his assistants failed completely in training backup Brett Hundley to play quarterback in their offense. Or general manager Ted Thompson has wasted a year by putting his chips on someone who can’t win throwing from the pocket.


Continue reading:
https://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2017/11/19/silverstein-brett-hundleys-performance-sparks-many-tough-questions-packers/873467001/ 

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
7 years ago
or Brett Hundley is a practice warrior and practices like Tarzan and plays like Jane. This doesn't exclude the other options, just adds one in a general sense.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
7 years ago
To improve each week is something. To revert to AWFUL should NOT be acceptable.
Time to give some other QB a shot.
I mean, what is there to lose???
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
7 years ago

or Brett Hundley is a practice warrior and practices like Tarzan and plays like Jane. This doesn't exclude the other options, just adds one in a general sense.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I've heard from numerous sources that Hundley always looks very good in practice. This gives creedence to the theory that it's emotion, that he psychs himself out when it really matters. Dude needs to relax and get in the zone.

This Ravens D was an unusually tough group. I bet he bounces back against the Steelers.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
7 years ago

I've heard from numerous sources that Hundley always looks very good in practice. This gives creedence to the theory that it's emotion, that he psychs himself out when it really matters. Dude needs to relax and get in the zone.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


I don't think it's about when it really matters... as much as
It's about when he can really get hit!

When Hundley gets hit (or makes errors) he reverts back to not be willing to stay in the pocket and/or thinking too much and not releasing the ball when the first guy gets open.

This Ravens D was an unusually tough group. I bet he bounces back against the Steelers.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


Um, both those teams have unusually tough defenses...
Defensive Point Per Game (given up)
[list=1]
  • Jacksonville Jaguars 14.1
  • Pittsburgh Steelers 16.5
  • Baltimore Ravens 17.1[/list]

  • Also both are in the top 4 for INTs.... though the Steelers are pretty low in fumbles.
    UserPostedImage
    Barfarn
    7 years ago
    It's either this or that...to even begin with this moronic monosyllabic pseudo-journalisitc bullshit; it must begin with the assumption that every QB that has not been inducted into the HOF after his 4 games is a worthless POS.

    I say lets show Rams some tape of Goff's first 4 games last year and pick him up for a conditional 6th.

    One huge difference between Rodgers and Hundley sitting on the bench for 2 years is that the CBA now allows about 1/3 the practice time the '05-08 CBA did. Rodgers probably got 10x the # of practice reps Hundley got as a BU.

    Hundley's 1st 3 drives were pretty good; but for 2 INTs.

    Hundley's first INT was over prep. Smith let Adams go. Cobb was the correct read and Hundley knew he'd be open; if only Smith played his position correctly. This is where most of Rodgers' INTs come from. Its hard to practice a play repeatedly, develop a mental memory of what to do and then the D does something stupid. The only way to over come your preparation in these cases is to experience.

    His 2nd INT he had a big play, Kendricks got behind Weddle, Hundley just didn't get his feet set making it more likely for the ball to slip as he threw, after running for his life with crap OL play. This over anxiousness simply has to be worked out under fire.

    Bart Starr started one game as a rookie and had 38 other attempts. In his first 4 starts of his 2nd year GB was 1-3 and Starr had 6 INT...Should have cut the bum, right?

    In Favre's 3rd year [after starting 13 in his 2nd season] in his first 4 starts GB was 1-3 Favre had 5 INTs. Should have cut his bum too, right?

    Now let's apply the Silver[stein]fish theory and declare stupid and Il-prepared yahoo coaches, Lombardi and Holmgren!

    Again the world is shown how emotional and stupid the GB "fan" is. Have some god damn pride; learn your god damn history, and most of all grow fucking up. This isn't like when the "ultra- oft" packer fan was playing with his Barbie and Ken dolls in his 13 YO mental nirvana. Adults adjust their expectations to reality.


    Edit: Beast didn't see your post! Okay, yea, let's talk about stuff like that, I didn't think of that so wasn't looking for it in the partial review I've done on Hundleys's play. That's interesting, I'll look!
    uffda udfa
    7 years ago
    Did you have any issues when Silverstein and the lot of them were writing flattering puff pieces? Was that "better" journalism?

    Asking no questions and pushing the puff piece agenda is not the media's role. They are to ask tough questions and I'm glad to see them starting to do the job they've neglected for years.

    There should be a cacophony of tough questions reverberating through 1265. It's time to do their job. I ask questions all the time that should be posted but the circle session never ends. It's really tough watching how this whole thing functions.

    In the end, it leaves a fanbase stripped of so much and creates something that just shouldn't be. We should all be asking tough questions and seeking answers not just humpty do going along.

    I've been in media, I've seen the web of control. It's ugly and creates false perceptions that flatter the org but is bereft of objectivity. I was in the studio when Jim Saccomano called and warned that we would lose access if we were critical of the team. I was on the call when Ricky Watters was abruptly removed from national airwaves about a negative question the Seahawks didn't want asked. Guess what? No more Seahawks interviews for rest of season. You don't get it. Almost all media in certain cities are nothing but glorified groupies unwilling to ask any pertinent question. When they decide to try they get censored. It's an ugly pathetic charade and all the while the fanbase is shaped just the way an org desires but its through complete and utter manipulation. Despicable. I get that. I've seen it and lived it in several cities.

    It is GOOD Tommy is finally doing his job. A guy like McGinn was reviled by the org and most of the fanbase because he wouldn't tickle the ears like everyone else. He was the best we had but hated because he did his job even though some will never understand it.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    buckeyepackfan
    7 years ago

    or Brett Hundley is a practice warrior and practices like Tarzan and plays like Jane. This doesn't exclude the other options, just adds one in a general sense.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    It maybe last Sunday was the absolute worst he could be and he bounces back.

    Big Ben threw 5 picks against Jacksonville and the "The all knowing never wrong media "questioned whether he could play anymore.
    Don't think The,Steelers have lost since.

    Yes let's all congratulate Tom Silverstein for jumping to conclusions on a subject he knows absolutely nothing about.

    Here's a fact.
    At 0-10 The Cleveland Browns have not been Eliminated from the playoffs.
    36 things must happen the next 6 weeks, if they do, The Browns would make the playoffs at 6-10.
    ESPN has the whole thing worked out, just go to their website.

    No matter what happens the next 3 weeks with The other NFC teams, if The Packers can win 2 of 3, they will still be in the hunt.!

    So tired of coming here and reading how The Packers must fail the rest if the year, because if they do some here think they will get their wish.

    Retrospect , a very small part of me hopes it happens so those who want it to will be exposed next year.

    For now The Packers have a tough match up Sunday , I'm hoping they can pull off the upset.

    They lose, it's back to Lambeau to get ready for Tampa Bay!

    I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
    wpr
    • wpr
    • Preferred Member
    7 years ago

    To improve each week is something. To revert to AWFUL should NOT be acceptable.
    Time to give some other QB a shot.
    I mean, what is there to lose???

    Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



    Hundley doesn't have to even "improve" each week. He can have ups and downs from week to week depending on the defense he faces. As long as there is a general trend upward that would satisfy most fans.

    UserPostedImage

    Trouble is he doesn't seem to have improved at all and might even be regressing in some phases of the game from the time he was drafted until today.
    UserPostedImage
    Porforis
    7 years ago

    Hundley doesn't have to even "improve" each week. He can have ups and downs from week to week depending on the defense he faces. As long as there is a general trend upward that would satisfy most fans.

    UserPostedImage

    Trouble is he doesn't seem to have improved at all and might even be regressing in some phases of the game from the time he was drafted until today.

    Originally Posted by: wpr 



    People severely overvalue practice and preseason snaps. Out of actual games, he's actually improved a bit - but considering how conservative the playcalling was his first game, it's no wonder at all why he's making dumb throws now instead of two games ago. He moved the football very effectively the first drive and to a lesser extent the second drive. This is not something that he has shown prior to that in any sort of a meaningful situation. The INTs were bad - But still potentially correctable. Give him at least one, maybe two more games - can he still move the football like that intermittently and cut down on the mistakes? If so, bam - serviceable backup. If not - he doesn't have the head for pro football. But seriously, this is the first game they actually had him run a not-super-conservative offense. Give it at least one more game.
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
    beast (2h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
    Zero2Cool (8h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
    packerfanoutwest (9h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
    beast (10h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
    Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
    packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
    Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.