Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

Aaron's just as likely to be in favor of it as against it imo. But I'm not desperately clinging to Aaron either.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I got you.
I would hate to see him go, but it wouldn't effect how I think about The Packers, or keep me from backing them.

There's just many people here who think they know all the answers

For every action there is a reaction , and sometimes those reactions bring consequences the average fan couldnt or didn't want to happen.

I could see The 49rs giving up Garrapolo and 2 1st rnd picks for Aaron .

I guess that would be ok.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Smokey
7 years ago
If , and I said if , GB want's to change from McCarthy , who would want the job ?

Jeff Fisher ?

The Mooch ?

John Gruden ?

Brett Favre ?

UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

If , and I said if , GB want's to change from McCarthy , who would want the job ?

Jeff Fisher ?

The Mooch ?

John Gruden ?

Brett Favre ?

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



You see Smokey it doesn't matter.
The members who are calling for change don't care.
The just want to be right.

They want the current regime to be gone, no matter the consequences.

Funny , my nephew is a huge Lion fan.
After the game last night he posted on FB:

"Woohoo Lions win! We're 4-4 and back in the race for The North title!"

I guess it's all how you look at things.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Will he coach it out?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I dunno, but I really think you need to hug it out find happy thoughts to think about.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago
Why would they ever can Mikey? After all he IS a highly successful NFL coach.

His record
Favre 21-11
Rogers 94-47
Others 2-7

Rodgers record should be 94-45. It doesn't seem fair to tag him with 2 losses in games he went down in the first quarter. But one can say it isn't fair to stick the back up with a loss when he didn't have a chance to prepare.

The reality is Mikey is a very successful NFL coach because he has had two HoF QBs to lean on. Without them he has not shown us that he is somebody special. Well they almost beat New England one time with a back up QB. Sorry that doesn't mean diddly. Hey he has a street named after him. That must make him special.

Obviously you can't fire McCarthy without having some kind of a clue as to who would be his replacement. But that isn't my job.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
7 years ago

If , and I said if , GB want's to change from McCarthy , who would want the job ?

Jeff Fisher ?

The Mooch ?

John Gruden ?

Brett Favre ?

Originally Posted by: Smokey 



Edgar Bennett.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Why would they ever can Mikey? After all he IS a highly successful NFL coach.

His record
Favre 21-11
Rogers 94-47
Others 2-7

Rodgers record should be 94-45. It doesn't seem fair to tag him with 2 losses in games he went down in the first quarter. But one can say it isn't fair to stick the back up with a loss when he didn't have a chance to prepare.

The reality is Mikey is a very successful NFL coach because he has had two HoF QBs to lean on. Without them he has not shown us that he is somebody special. Well they almost beat New England one time with a back up QB. Sorry that doesn't mean diddly. Hey he has a street named after him. That must make him special.

Obviously you can't fire McCarthy without having some kind of a clue as to who would be his replacement. But that isn't my job.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I thought Mike McCarthy had TIE in there somewhere? A game ending in a TIE, I feel is stupid.

McCarthy is a successful coach, I just don't think he can get this team over the top.

I had advocated swapping Mike's ... We take Tomlin, Steelers take McCarthy. I really think it would do both franchises wonders.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
There was a tie against the Vikings when we were trotting out terrible backup QB's like Hundley.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

I thought Mike McCarthy had TIE in there somewhere? A game ending in a TIE, I feel is stupid.

McCarthy is a successful coach, I just don't think he can get this team over the top.

I had advocated swapping Mike's ... We take Tomlin, Steelers take McCarthy. I really think it would do both franchises wonders.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I thought there was a tie too. I was over at football reference's website. I was rushing to get it done. I probably missed it.
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
7 years ago

I thought there was a tie too. I was over at football reference's website. I was rushing to get it done. I probably missed it.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



It was a Flynn tie against the Vikings
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (1h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (2h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (2h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (2h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (3h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (3h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (5h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (14h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (20h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (21h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

23m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

25m / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.