Porforis
7 years ago

Aaron does that on purpose.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Can't tell if a joke.
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Hundley throws one of the prettiest balls. It's too bad he's not accurate with them. His pocket presence is nil. He was close to connecting with 17 on a long one.

Z is right. Comparing this guy...any guy to 12 in his prime is pretty stupid. I'm comparing him to Seneca and Scott and he's about that level with more ability to run.

Hundley should be in a fast break offense. He needs that to create tempo as there is none when huddling. He can't play set it up and go ball. Not smart enough or experienced enough to succeed in a "half court" game. Sadly, we can't play that way with our defense. Time of possession would make things even worse for our 11 man sieve.

I honestly think it's a coin flip as to whether he improves enough to beat Cleveland next month.

All the negatives Gruden alluded to from his college days have been in plain sight. We were the only team to jump on Brett in the draft. Everyone else saw how flawed he was causing him to "drop". We seem to love drafting all these dropping players. 12 is only one who really worked out.

The worst thing is Hundley has killed his trade value. No team is going to give up anything for this guy outside of maybe a 7th.

Bears play good D. Hundley's in for a rough one. Good news is Bears have no offense so maybe everyone will be placated and off the defense next Sunday.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Porforis
7 years ago

Aaron went 6-10 that first year disn't he? Lot of injuries on D, they couldn't stop anyone...

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yup. That being said, he ended up moving the ball better. Hundley's never going to be a Rodgers but it's possible he'll be serviceable as a backup. But yeah, they need to just let 'im rip and he needs to work on the happy feet. Unfortunately that's been a problem for him for years.
uffda udfa
7 years ago
He might be serviceable as a backup with the 85 Bears D behind him but he won't be with us.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

If we see progress from one week to the next with Brett, that's a good thing. IF he makes the same mistakes over and over again, that's bad.

Lay the hell off Brett. Every QB, EVERY SINGLE QB misses an open guy from time to time.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I agree, but the point was that lots of people are complaining about Mike McCarthy not calling any long routes, which turned out to be false. Mike McCarthy appears to have long routes called for, but the QB is playing the short ball, just like (but opposite) of Rodgers playing the long ball.

Evan trained QBs can't see everything, but where their focus is, sometimes means what they'll miss... like Rodgers misses wide open short routes because he's looking long... Hundley is missing the open long routes because he's looking short/thinking about running.

But there does seem to be long routes there, just the QB we're watching, currently has the opposite mentality from the QB we're used to watching... and that might be what is driving some of us nuts.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago


I don't complain that Mike isn't calling deep routes, it is what he is calling that is the problem IMO. Hundley is a young QB, so he is going to spooked from the pocket faster so the opportunity for deep routes are going to be fewer, so the plays called need to be better designed for options in the lesser time Hundley is going to be spending in the pocket compared to an experienced Veteran.

When they went hurry up, all of a sudden Hundley is connecting on crossing routes. Went back to huddle and McCarthy called plays and that success disappears until they want back to the no-huddle hurry up.

McCarthy's typical play calling utilizes behind the LOS, sidelines and deep crossing. He doesn't attack from inside the numbers from the LOS to 10-15 yards down field. Defenses have figured that out and cover accordingly.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (16h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (16h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (17h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.