uffda udfa
7 years ago
Z,

I wasn't referring to you rather those who couldn't wait in a rush to judgment to side with Bennett.

What I've said consistently on Twitter is we need to see whole video but very conveniently body cam video is NA at some of the main points of contention.

Ultimately, he wasn't truthful painting this with HIS bias. He agrees at end about why he was detained and shakes their hand. This calls into question everything he wrote in his statement. He was told why he was detained and it is completely reasonable to detain and pull gun in an active shooter situation. Nothing MB said happened is surprising outside of his obvious level of fear on the video. I don't doubt he was terrified but his personal fear isn't relevant. From what I saw and my personal experience in 6+ years in LE this is another situation of claimed racism where none existed.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
If packer players and coaches want to make a sign of unity. You now have your chance. Next game if you want to join arms and take a knee during the anthem. Do it in honor for those injured and killed in Vegas
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Uh oh....here comes this question... Why are you for that and not for being against racism you bigot!? 🙂
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Cheesey
7 years ago
Has anyone else noticed all the fans "booing" when the players did their "protest"?
Also, in the Packer game last Thursday, when they fanned the crowd to show the fans to see how many "locked arms", I only saw about 6 people doing so. MANY more with their hands over their hearts.
This is pretty much how it's been all around the country. I guess they are all "racists".🤣

Seriously, I think this shows just how many people REALLY understand what's going on. The only thing that will change anything, is if people that are pulled over just do what the police tell them to do, and not try to make this into something it's not. Police have a hard enough job, without people feeling they are getting "dissed" anytime they get pulled over.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
7 years ago


Ultimately, he wasn't truthful painting this with HIS bias. He agrees at end about why he was detained and shakes their hand. This calls into question everything he wrote in his statement. He was told why he was detained and it is completely reasonable to detain and pull gun in an active shooter situation. Nothing MB said happened is surprising outside of his obvious level of fear on the video. I don't doubt he was terrified but his personal fear isn't relevant. From what I saw and my personal experience in 6+ years in LE this is another situation of claimed racism where none existed.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



A strong DRIVEN agenda is behind this corrupt and dishonest argument that not only AVOIDS the FACTS outlined in other posts; but then embarks on every logic error known to man. This type of argument can be used to support any despicable AGENDA...here's an example:

Vietnam POW Hal Kushner during his incarceration made statements that show he agrees at the end about why he was detained and metaphorically shakes the hands of his captures.

I doubt he was terrified. Kushner recordings didn't even show the level of fear Bennett showed. This jibes with the personal experience of a random Viet Kong guys that said they lived in Vietnam for 6 years and according to what they saw and their personal experiences, there was no mistreatment of POWs.

This calls into question everything the Nam POWs said about their treatment, must be them being racists. [Rolling eyes].

Now for some truth.

During a police stops most Blacks can focus on what a Georgia State cop said [cops only kill Black people] and the Black parental and Black societal training [how to survive an encounter with police] they received. And obviously after you've had a gun to your head and a cop says I'm fucking going to blow it off...and you can feel his adrenaline, anxiety and the determination in his voice; the key is to not be taken to jail where you can die; but to survive the encounter so you can do something about it.

Bennett was 100% aware that if these cops could foresee the future, they're gonna get nailed and they know it, he may have been taken to a jail and found to have hung himself or committed suicide with 6 shots to the back. The LVMPD is the most brutal and corrupt PD in America's major metros.

So the handshake having meaning and being the "last thing" was not honest argument. Ufda knows statements made under duress are not reliable. Ufda knows Bennett spoke to an attorney after he felt safe. A threat to sue during the encounter could have gotten him killed or hit with dozens of other charges after, EG drugs, were planted on him.

In 2003, Bennett’s attorney secured $11M for 119, that’s 119 plaintiffs against the Oakland PD. “The Riders” brutalized suspects, planted evidence, filed false reports, etc. The Whistleblower was Keith Batt, a rookie fresh out of academy, who heroically did the work of a real cop. But, his fellow cops didn’t praise his sense of honor and justice; they ostracized, threatened and intimidated him [Resulting in a $625K emotional damage award].

Interestingly, in May, Officer Batt shot Shannon Edward Estill, guess what, he activated his body cam before the confrontation.

BTW, the Vegas cop that threatened Bennett had his on as well! They just not showing it and have tried to destroy the recording.

You want to understand cops; learn about the Riders, how supervisors reacted to complaints and how the supposed "majority of good cops" reacted when they learned of this stuff.

Again the LVMPD is gong pay HUGE dollars and they know it. Hopefully, they wont resist reforms that will be imposed on them for this.
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

BTW, the Vegas cop that threatened Bennett had his on as well! They just not showing it and have tried to destroy the recording.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 


If they are not showing, how do you know this?
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
7 years ago

If they are not showing, how do you know this?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Because there were 126 police videos collected. That means just about every other cam was on, if not ALL of the others. Burris will make an issue of this and if it turns out that this was the only cam that was supposedly off out of 127, they're toast. Even if 5 were off, they're toast.

The cams are mandated by insurance underwriters because every single major metro PD pays millions every year for brutality claims. Like everything new, the last thing one would think of when being dispatched to, EG, a shooting was to engage the cam.

Some agencies are lax; but several that I know of are really on this. If you had contact with public and no video, even if nothing happened, you'd get written up. Dispatchers will remind them when riding to the calls. Every meetings they'd mention the cams, when interacting. And just like if a cop forgot his vest, the partner will make sure its on before they arrive at scene, your partner willl make sure your camera is on. Any cop you bump into at the scene that notices will say something about the camera being off, because they dont want their brother to get written up.

If half the cams were off, we could chalk that up to the Dept being lax. But, 126 videos, they are not lax about reminding each other to turn on the cams and the dispatch tapes will undoubtedly show this.

Note: The cops learned the veracity claiming the cam malfunctioned can be determined; so they've learned the best story is forgetfulness. Undoubtedly the dispatch tapes will show the cams were mentioned several times.

Note: some have argued the cams should run all the time; but these guys/gals have go to have down time during the day that must remain private.
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Because there were 126 police videos collected. That means just about every other cam was on, if not ALL of the others. Burris will make an issue of this and if it turns out that this was the only cam that was supposedly off out of 127, they're toast. Even if 5 were off, they're toast.

The cams are mandated by insurance underwriters because every single major metro PD pays millions every year for brutality claims. Like everything new, the last thing one would think of when being dispatched to, EG, a shooting was to engage the cam.

Some agencies are lax; but several that I know of are really on this. If you had contact with public and no video, even if nothing happened, you'd get written up. Dispatchers will remind them when riding to the calls. Every meetings they'd mention the cams, when interacting. And just like if a cop forgot his vest, the partner will make sure its on before they arrive at scene, your partner willl make sure your camera is on. Any cop you bump into at the scene that notices will say something about the camera being off, because they dont want their brother to get written up.

If half the cams were off, we could chalk that up to the Dept being lax. But, 126 videos, they are not lax about reminding each other to turn on the cams and the dispatch tapes will undoubtedly show this.

Note: The cops learned the veracity claiming the cam malfunctioned can be determined; so they've learned the best story is forgetfulness. Undoubtedly the dispatch tapes will show the cams were mentioned several times.

Note: some have argued the cams should run all the time; but these guys/gals have go to have down time during the day that must remain private.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



So, you actually do not know. You are assuming and pushing that out as fact.

Really wish people could be thrown in jail for lying and/or misleading. Maybe we would then see some honor in this world instead of emotionally charged people twisting things to agenda. Tired of it, absolutely tired of it.

UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

Because there were 126 police videos collected. That means just about every other cam was on, if not ALL of the others. Burris will make an issue of this and if it turns out that this was the only cam that was supposedly off out of 127, they're toast. Even if 5 were off, they're toast.

The cams are mandated by insurance underwriters because every single major metro PD pays millions every year for brutality claims. Like everything new, the last thing one would think of when being dispatched to, EG, a shooting was to engage the cam.

Some agencies are lax; but several that I know of are really on this. If you had contact with public and no video, even if nothing happened, you'd get written up. Dispatchers will remind them when riding to the calls. Every meetings they'd mention the cams, when interacting. And just like if a cop forgot his vest, the partner will make sure its on before they arrive at scene, your partner willl make sure your camera is on. Any cop you bump into at the scene that notices will say something about the camera being off, because they dont want their brother to get written up.

If half the cams were off, we could chalk that up to the Dept being lax. But, 126 videos, they are not lax about reminding each other to turn on the cams and the dispatch tapes will undoubtedly show this.

Note: The cops learned the veracity claiming the cam malfunctioned can be determined; so they've learned the best story is forgetfulness. Undoubtedly the dispatch tapes will show the cams were mentioned several times.

Note: some have argued the cams should run all the time; but these guys/gals have go to have down time during the day that must remain private.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



There is a flaw in your "logic". You are assuming 126 videos were all police videos. Now remember this was in Vegas. Casino have cameras everywhere covering everything they legally can. I would lay odds that almost all of those videos were not from police body cams.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Barfarn
7 years ago

There is a flaw in your "logic". You are assuming 126 videos were all police videos. Now remember this was in Vegas. Casino have cameras everywhere covering everything they legally can. I would lay odds that almost all of those videos were not from police body cams.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



No flaws: I expressly stated in a few posts back that the LVMPD stated they have 126 cop cam videos[see below]!

The USA today reported 2 days after incident that the Police had collected 861 videos, and I'm sure they have more by now. Of course, given the their idiotic, unusual and outrageous public stance it's actually a conflict of interest for them to continue investigating.

So, you actually do not know. You are assuming and pushing that out as fact.

Really wish people could be thrown in jail for lying and/or misleading. Maybe we would then see some honor in this world instead of emotionally charged people twisting things to agenda. Tired of it, absolutely tired of it.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Let's take a rational look at things here! In argument there is a difference between a fact and a conclusion. And not all conclusion are prefaced with a "therefore." Example:

If I were to similarly take your statement ["You are assuming and pushing out as fact"] out of context and state you are stating this as a fact, I'd be acting within the parameters of your logic. But, those are actually conclusions based on what you portend to assert as a misrepresentation my part.

Of course to run your little gambit, you had to pull one sentence out of context of all I stated on the subject and then you built your argument on that . This is called a strawman.

FACT IS I wrote stuff that you left out of your little gambit, to wit: "The LVMPD stated it has 126 dash and body cam videos of the alleged shooting and this is all they got that portends to show the appropriateness of their behavior? 126 videos! What is that 30-40+ cars and 80+ cops? All these cops activated 126 video cams to run…but oops the one guy, the one effing cop, that could prove Bennett’s a liar had his off. What an amazing coincidence, simply amazing. However, what does Malcolm Nance teach us? Answer: coincidences take an awful lot of planning [Emphasis added]."

Its quite clear to many, if not mostly all, the disappeared cam video was not being "pushing out" as any uncontrovertible fact; but a conclusion based on the circumstances.

And emotional? I dont think so, emotional argument is one that cannot be supported by facts, logic and reason. If one takes the uncontroverted listed facts, the unusual/squirrelly way the LVMPD is acting and apply the doctrine of Res ipsa loquitur; a jury could easily conclude the cam was intentionally left off or its contents concealed. My conclusion is based on fact, sound rational logic and legal principles.

And let's look at your little gambit here. You ask a simple question in a way that purports to look like you're seeking further understanding. I then take the time out of my life to elucidate this to you; because it is what a kind, open-minded, helpful, patriotic American does😂. But, you didn;t ask the question for understanding, did ya? You were plotting and scheming searching for a gotchya moment, weren't you 😂?

Since, you speak of honor, If I had such a circumstance here's how I'd honorably handle it: "Do I understand you correctly? The way I'm reading what you wrote, you seem to be stating the nonexistence of this video as a fact, do you have any inside info?"

And I think subjecting someone to criminal prosecution and incarcerating for purportedly misleading on a Packer Forum is not a position that can be supported with rationality and legal acumen...maybe its a tad emotional, just a tad😂. Oh and maybe you wont be so "tired of it," if you had respect for disagreement and really really tried to set aside the biases that we all have and WORK to see another's POV.

I think this underscores why the Anthem protests are so contentious. People are losing the ability to be civil in disagreement, which undermines a basic American tenant [A peaceful transition of power]. The Party's have to fight to the death, compromise is gone and their willing to break the law to "WIN." Black's are being brutalized by cops on the street, nothing is being done, so Protest comes. Rather than listening, compromising, trying to find areas of agreement, America is searching for ways to DEFEAT the protest instead of searching for a solution and trying to accommodate. America better wake-up before there is no America.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Great throw by Hurts
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
beast (10-Feb) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
beast (10-Feb) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : wtf Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : oh fuck me i messed that up
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Carter was 9th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : another crap halftime show
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think it is over, but then I think of Atlanta and want Philly to go in with the same intensity in the second half
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

7-Feb / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.