uffda udfa
7 years ago
I saw this on ESPN this AM...

If there's a better quarterback in the league than Brady, it's Aaron Rodgers, who put a substandard Packers offense on his back last season and carried it all the way to the NFC Championship Game.

How I see the Packers is echoed in the above from ESPN. If the offense as a whole is substandard and we all agree the defense is substandard, then how do we really feel about our team? I see all of our success as a function of Rodgers greatness. How I think others view this team is...we're a great team built by one of the great GM's in the game. One of these positions is not correct.

So, how do you see your team? All Aaron Rodgers...or a great team built by Ted Thompson? It's pretty clear what the perception is in the ESPN comment. Not a good offense, not a good defense, but an all world QB carrying a total mess of a roster to the NFC Championship. Can you separate fact from fiction? Rodgers is that good...the fact he's had to play with what we have on this roster is shameful. Bad defense and a substandard offense.

Let's talk. Let's be honest. How do you see your team? ESPN comment wrong and biased?... or have you been wrong and biased? I'll stand hand in hand with ESPN on this one.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


steveishere
7 years ago
I think overall nationally our WRs are overrated but OL is underrated and Montgomery is underrated because talent wise he's a legit RB but is seen as a WR playing RB still and not a true threat. Since Rodgers is so good and OL not being a flashy part of teams I think the "talent" around Rodgers this year isn't going to get enough credit.
uffda udfa
7 years ago

I think overall nationally our WRs are overrated but OL is underrated and Montgomery is underrated because talent wise he's a legit RB but is seen as a WR playing RB still and not a true threat. Since Rodgers is so good and OL not being a flashy part of teams I think the "talent" around Rodgers this year isn't going to get enough credit.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Montgomery can't be underrated until he's able to carry it 25 times a game. He's not a true #1 RB until he can consistently carry it 25 times a game. He's never done that one time. The most Ty has ever carried it is 16 times. Every other game of his career he hasn't even touched it double digits. So, right now, all 88 is is a nice bit player taking a few carries. He is one of my favorite Packers and I really like who he is or how he presents himself on twitter, but he's not a legit RB...yet. I understand that talent wise he's a real RB but real RB's carry it more than Ty has.

Our OL is a good group. Not sure they're underrated. Who would be doing such a thing?

Rodgers is why we win. Barfarn talks evidence all the time. When 12 isn't around this team is literally at the bottom of the NFL. Matt Flynn! Matt Flynn! This team doesn't win without 12 like most teams don't without their top gun but we have a poor D and an O that doesn't really work well without a superstar running it, so I'd say we're a very poor crew of support around Aaron Rodgers. It's been too many years of a weak roster around our one superstar. I'm pretty sure that's how it will continue until regime change.

Interesting nobody is here to defend the org's honor on this but it is pretty cut and dried why this team has been in the playoffs 8 straight years. One guy. Aaron Rodgers. Get the man some help!!!!!


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
7 years ago
I need at least four regular season games before I can see the team. And even then that's early. That said, I still predict them getting 11 or so wins. I am spoiled. I take the Packers getting into playoffs for granted. I'm waiting for post-season already.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
7 years ago
0 RBs averaged 25 carries a game last year. Only 2 were over 20. That's a completely arbitrary number. Unless NFL.com stats are wrong for att/game nobody has averaged 25 carries a game since 2010, that's a completely ridiculous standard.

I'm not talking about some arbitrary "real RB" standard anyways I'm talking about when he's in the backfield our running game is a threat. Health is a big issue but the dudes a good RB.
beast
7 years ago

Montgomery can't be underrated until he's able to carry it 25 times a game. He's not a true #1 RB until he can consistently carry it 25 times a game.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You're always setting ridiculously standards ... in four years Lacy had 788 carries over 51 carries, that's a consistent carry of 15.45 times per game. So you're saying Montgomery has to carry it 61.8% more often than the last #1 RB, to prove he's equal? That's just ridiculously!

In 2016, guess how many RBs averaged 25 rushes per game? NONE... only two averaged 20 carries per game in Le'Veon Bell and Ezekiel Elliott. Bell and Elliott only run it 25 times a game 3 times (each) all season... so even they don't consistently carry it 25 times a game!

So to prove Montgomery is a #1 RB, he must do something no other RB does? BULLSHIT!
UserPostedImage
Smokey
7 years ago
How do you see (rate/evaluate/access/score) your team ? The question does not ask , how do you want to see your team ? Being able to look past your team loyalty to reveal the unvarnished truth is being honest , not disloyal to your team .

IMO, without Aaron Rodgers , GB's Offense is at best an average team. He has made , by virtue of his skills , made some WR's better than they should have been . Also , a good QB is an aid to a teams RB's as it makes opposing defenses play both the run and the pass , instead of focusing on just one or the other . Additionally , an Offensive line is like the foundation of a house . It needs to support the Offense in both run blocking and pass blocking . GB is lucky to have a quality OL , but without a future HOF QB in Rodgers , GBis still just an average Offense .

On the defensive side of the field, at this point in time I'm just not sure what we are going to see this season. The CB positions will either make or break this 2017 GB Defense . House may be serviceable , but the other CB position may see a revolving door of also want-to-be starters as opposing QB's slice and dice the Packer's secondary .

The Special Teams , IMO , will be special with Travis Davis returning kicks .


GO PACK GO !

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
88 has carried it more than 9 times once in his career. I should've put 20-25 carries. My bad.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Poppa San
7 years ago
Enough of this BS the team would get a top 5 draft pick if Rodgers wasn't under center. Matt friggin Flynn had a .500 record with this team. Albeit a small sample size but he still went 3-3 and would have won the fourth against NE in Foxboro if the defense could have held a 4th quarter lead. I believe the team is better than being given credit for and has been over the years. Rodgers just puts them over the top. Unfortunately for him, coaches getting out smarted (or outsmarting themselves) and brain farts by youth have kept him from returning to the winners circle.
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

I awoke this morning with a headache. I still went to work. She went back to sleep.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

Enough of this BS the team would get a top 5 draft pick if Rodgers wasn't under center. Matt friggin Flynn had a .500 record with this team. Albeit a small sample size but he still went 3-3 and would have won the fourth against NE in Foxboro if the defense could have held a 4th quarter lead. I believe the team is better than being given credit for and has been over the years. Rodgers just puts them over the top. Unfortunately for him, coaches getting out smarted (or outsmarting themselves) and brain farts by youth have kept him from returning to the winners circle.

Originally Posted by: Poppa San 



In what year did Flynn go 3-3? That's his record over the 6 seasons he played for GB. His best year was 2014 when he went 2-2. There are only 13 players on the team this year who played in 2014. That includes Barclay who is IR, Crosby and Goode. Just because Flynn won 2 games in 2014 doesn't mean anything today.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (14m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (26m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (37m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (47m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (1h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (5h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (5h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (5h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (5h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (5h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (5h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (5h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (5h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (6h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (6h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (6h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (9h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (19h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.