beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
7 years ago
Which WRs do you think will make it to the Packers 53 man roster?

How the Packers handle their influx of talent at the wide receiver position come the September 2nd cut-down day—or even before then—is likely going to draw in a hoard of mixed reviews.

From 6-5 ½ Michael Clark to golden-boy Max McCaffrey, there's no denying that the cluster of receivers is creating even more of a challenge for general manager Ted Thompson and his front office crew.

There's no certainty at any position in the NFL, but there are players whose roster spots are all but solidified and likely have been—and will continue to be—for an extensive period of time.
Randall Cobb is one of those players, and from the seventh-year receiver's perspective, McCaffrey has been exactly as advertised and has stood out to Cobb the most.

Why? His reasons were seemingly endless.
"He's shown up every day, he's done everything right, he's answered all the questions right in meeting rooms, he's practiced really hard, he's played well in games," Cobb said of the second-year McCaffrey. Someone who Cobb claimed has had "a great camp so far."

McCaffrey hasn't gotten into the end zone through the Packers' three preseason games, however, his seven catches on his 12 targets that totaled 81 yards is apparently enough live-game action to help support Cobb's opinion. Chances are, Cobb isn't the only one who feels that way either.
............
Barring his health, Cobb could add to his already impressive catch percentage, which, of receivers who have played at least six seasons (since 2011), Cobb has the highest with 70.1 percent. 

Even since the 1970 merger, Cobb's feats hold true. Of receivers with at least 500 targets, he holds the second-highest catch percentage. His 70.1 percent rate is just behind Wes Welker (another renowned slot receiver) and his 70.8 percent.

His dependability is why he has become such an intricate part of the Packers' offense, not to mention Aaron Rodgers hasn't exactly held back in singing his praises for Cobb. When he's on the field, the offense seems to move fluidly. Both coaches and front office personnel seem to recognize that.

CheeseheadTV  wrote:


UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
7 years ago
Consistency is right there next to availability and, at WR, Max has probably been tops in both of those categories during the pre-season.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

Consistency is right there next to availability and, at WR, Max has probably been tops in both of those categories during the pre-season.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 


After Nelson, Cobb and Adams, There is Janis and Davis who have seemed to lock up spots on the final 53.
Allison will be back after 1 game.

Packers keep 7 1st week, that leaves Dupre (injured reserve) my guess.
Crocket will be cut.
Clark (my guess is he will end up on PS.
Very raw, but you can't teach 6'6'!
Yancey and McCaffrey would be 6 and 7.
Yancey mainly because of his draft status.
McCaffrey has seemed to earn his spot with his play.
Thursday night gives them all 1 more chance to turn heads.


I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
7 years ago
How can we carry 2 guys in Janis and Davis who are basically being kept for what they give on ST's? Unless, I'm reading it wrong and one of them is now a trustworthy member of the WR corps, it seems illogical to use two roster spots for a gunner and a PR who both play WR. I think one of them is going to be cut and we'll keep 6. I'm not entirely certain Cobb may not be dealt. We've heard and seen so little of him this TC. His role is getting reduced due to 2 TE sets from a recent article and he's been very unreliable with his health so I don't feel he's a total lock at 10mil.

5 on the roster wouldn't surprise me nor would 7. No way they keep 7 and have Allison hanging over their heads with his one week roster exemption. So, if Allison isn't outright cut, they'll keep a max, no pun intended, of 6.

I've tried predicting what they'll do and keep erasing it because nothing seems right because I feel like something is going to happen to RC18. If Randall does go, I think Geronimo is a lock due to experience and performance from last year. If RC18 stays, I don't know if we keep Geronimo around as Max McCaffrey and Michael Clark are more intriguing options.



UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

How can we carry 2 guys in Janis and Davis who are basically being kept for what they give on ST's?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


You're assuming that they would only being kept for STs... which again... is horrible assumptions made by you. I don't know if they'll both be kept as it's a tight race, but currently Janis and Davis are #2 and #3 in more receiving yardages by the Packers behind McCaffrey. Point being, they might be kept for the combination of STs and WR skills.

I don't know if we keep Geronimo around as Max McCaffrey and Michael Clark are more intriguing options.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


McCaffrey and Clark are certainly intriguing options... but I think Geronimo Allison might be a lock to make the roster. He's seems to be in the top 4 WRs in talent and is on his rookie contract.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago

You're assuming that they would only being kept for STs... which again... is horrible assumptions made by you. I don't know if they'll both be kept as it's a tight race, but currently Janis and Davis are #2 and #3 in more receiving yardages by the Packers behind McCaffrey. Point being, they might be kept for the combination of STs and WR skills.


McCaffrey and Clark are certainly intriguing options... but I think Geronimo Allison might be a lock to make the roster. He's seems to be in the top 4 WRs in talent and is on his rookie contract.

Originally Posted by: beast 



You're getting very tiresome, beast. You are begging to be offended by my posts every single time I hit enter. Yet, again, not surprising, you argue completely out of context just to stalk me not unlike someone else in the recent past.

Here's the sentence you didn't include out so you could find fault:

Unless, I'm reading it wrong and one of them is now a trustworthy member of the WR corps, it seems illogical to use two roster spots for a gunner and a PR who both play WR.


Do we know how the staff feels about Janis and Davis as solely WR's? Are they repping with the ones in practice? I said UNLESS I'M READING IT WRONG (could be but it's stupid to burn two WR spots for guys who aren't very good WR's) If we have a hard decision to make and the other WR's are much better at being WR's but Davis and Janis are better at ST's than they are at playing WR what are they going to do? You can't tie up two roster spots for ST's specialists if they also aren't reliable WR's. That is the point. You have to stop taking things out of context and looking for your gotcha moment.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nyrpack
7 years ago
i do not see anyway the pack parts ways with geronimo, max may be a long shot but no way he gets a spot over geronimo after the one game suspension !!

my guess is the patriots end up with max, for some weird reason they get the so called white kid with hands all the time !!
jimmy b.
gbguy20
7 years ago
Getting rid of Janis makes the rest of this easy.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

You're getting very tiresome, beast.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Then stop making stupid assumptions that can't be proven.

Just because Janis and Davis are good on STs, and that's all you might see in them, in no way means that's all the Packers see in them...
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

my guess is the patriots end up with max, for some weird reason they get the so called white kid with hands all the time !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack 


Well if someone going to claim one of our WRs anyways, hopefully they willing to trade a late round draft pick for them instead of hoping no one ahead of them claims them first.

Also I believe the McCaffrey brothers have said they would love to play on the same team... and the Panthers seem to like WRs either tall (over 6') or fast (sub 4.4)

Getting rid of Janis makes the rest of this easy.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 


Yeah but he's also clearly the best gunner, and the other decent gunner options (Brice, Rollins, Evans) might have important roles on where Janis seems to be at best is the 5th WRs at the moment.

Also the Punter seems to be good but inconsistent... where having a good gunner could help stop returns.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (11h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (11h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (11h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (12h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (13h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (15h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (16h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (16h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (16h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (16h) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (16h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (16h) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (16h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
41m / Around The NFL / beast

10h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.