Wayne...Please, do not let any backlash in what you shared dissuade your future input. It's sad that Kramer is being defended because he's a former Packer. This is the very thing that I rail against. This rewriting of the narrative due to Packer bias. Truth is truth. Period.
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
Everyone has bias. Tall have a people bias. Curly hair bias. There's a Noo Yawk bias. A Chicawgo bias. Every sports team, every college, every state has a bias. (Have you read about ARod and CM3 talk abut No Cal and SCal? Bias.) Older siblings see things far differently than younger siblings. Especially if they have more than 5 years between them. That's a bias.
In short Packer fans do indeed have bias. It is not a bad thing. It's just a thing.
As far as truth goes, perspective is the key. I have a friend who is passionate about the Civil War. (He feels General George Thomas was the greatest general in the war. Union or Confederate. 40 years ago he even wrote a paper on it. He was probably 12 at the time. About 10 years ago he did a lot of talking on message boards to people who proudly defend the Confederacy. Long long long before the political hysteria we have today. We were talking one time and he said he is not sure what his convictions would be if he was born in Atlanta or Birmingham. A person is responsible for their actions but if you grow up being regaled with tales about the shoeless, gaunt men in shabby grey rags who defended their homes from the hoards of blue belly demons that burnt, raped and stole you would have a different outlook on the subject.