I never thought Vick was anything great anyway.
Sure, he could run, but his passing? Average at best.
"Formo" wrote:
That's what I'm thinking.
OK, morality and personality problems aside. TO is one of the top WRs in the past decade. Vick is a dangerous scrambler who's probably mediocre at best at THROWING the football.
I'd take TO. He's a playmaker. The only WR I'd take consistently over TO in the past decade is Randy Moss.
"zombieslayer" wrote:
I don't know the stats on Vick's passing, but I gotta believe that it is better than average. Again, not sure, I'll have to do some research..
But to answer the question, Vick, hands down.
T.O. is over rated. I've seen SOO many of his catches that he was more lucky to have caught them than it took talent to catch them. It's almost his hands are made of rock, and the ball bounces around between them before he gets his claws on it/or the refs call it a catch. Don't get me wrong, he's talented. But, still, over rated.
There are about 4 or so other WRs that I'd take over T.O. Fitzgerald, Moss, Boldin, and Reggie Wayne are 4 just from the top of my head that I'd take over T.O.
Oh, and my team needs a QB.
As far as the morality of Mr. Vick.. He's paying his dues now. And you better believe that the NFL will still penalize him when he's done with his sentence. When/If he gets reinstated, I gotta believe he'll come out a smarter, better human being. What he did, was wrong. But I also recognize that he's human, along with the rest of us. Not to mention.. I hate to say it, especially to those of you whom are dog lovers (this includes me), but, his victims.. were dogs. Not beings capable of moral fiber and emotional or logical decision making. Murder of a human being will ALWAYS be the greater 'sin' over the murder of a dog.
"Cheesey" wrote: