Maybe we should average the number of games we won for the 10 years before we had Aaron Rodgers.

This franchise has won more superbowls WITHOUT Aaron than they have with him.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Three.

If at that.

Originally Posted by: The_Green_Ninja 

I was thinking 3 as well. I have no faith in Huntley. He has not done anything to prove he is capable of leading the Packers during the regular season again the line tier defenses he will face.

There are no guarantees that anyone who is brought in will shore up the defense or ST.

Since Ted doesn't believe in FAs all we can assume is that he would do the same thing he has done in the past. Draft and "develop" with a few FAs who have no ties that will encumber future draft picks. That means next year's defense would not be better than average.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Exactly what people said about #12 when that other guy was our QB. That and, "He can't stay healthy."

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Maybe we should average the number of games we won for the 10 years before we had Aaron Rodgers.

This franchise has won more superbowls WITHOUT Aaron than they have with him.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Nerd, I know that's ONLY your opinion, but man......it was HOF QB Brett Favre! You can't make that kind of statement without taking into account who the previous QB was. It's not like we had a Jay Cutler at QB.
And the fact that Favre had many years with a MUCH better defense backing him up. Rodgers hasn't had that kind of advantage since they won the Super Bowl. An offense that went 15-1, and a defense which couldn't stop ANYONE. Scoring as many points as the Packers did that year, they should have gone 19-0. The defense folded like a cheap card table does at thanksgiving dinner.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey