I've thought a lot more about this. It is possible your Interpretation is correct. The key is the use of WE. Is WE implying him and Sammy, or everyone on the D, entire team, etc.? Your last posts went down this same track. Who is WE? If WE is he and Sam, it's a clear shot at Dom. That seems most likely as he's referring to his relationship with Sam and not the team.

Not surprised that you wouldn't allow for the possibility that it is a shot and are insisting it isn't. The evidence isn't there to say for sure that it isn't. More likely it was a shot than not, but you could be right.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

That is a Belichick must. BB said guys must love football. U get a Janis when a guy doesn't.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Just the fact that you're suggesting I could be right, means you know I'm right, and you're playing word games because you can't ever admit to being wrong. But I'll take it, thanks for half figuring it out. Though in your defense, it's not written the best.

More likely he's suggesting that the players don't always agree with all the play calls... but I can't name a single player on any level of football that has always agreed with play calls. If you listen to peewee football players and even they at times will complain about play calls... and it only gets worse the higher up you go.

So if a player says they never disagrees with a play call, then either they played in an extremely basic scheme where there weren't many play calls or they're lying.

If there is a shot in that, it's at the players who didn't live up to level that Haha see both Shields and himself.

Originally Posted by: beast 

All bulls--t about Dom. It was more for my teammates (coworkers) that complain about the play calling. Instead of just playing the call. ... Dom Capers' play calling is good enough. We have to get the play executed as a defense. This a business. I'm all in with Dom, so miss me [with] that. ... [People] who don't know a lick about football, just watch the game and shut the hell up. Ain't no sneak dissin [with] me. ... I'll never throw [people] under the bus. I want everybody to get they crumbs in this game including coaches. I ride with my entire organization.

Well, it looks like Beast is right on this one. Here is Ha-Ha's response to the Capers kerfuffle:

Source here  and here .

From the beginning, this really looked like people reading into something that wasn't there. I have no reason to doubt Ha-Ha's clarification on this matter.

Originally Posted by: Mr_Bumpy 

Maybe. Obviously, he got backlash for the comment on Capers and was being asked about it, or he wouldn't have written that.

Hard to tell if he's trying to cover for throwing Dom under the bus or if that's really the truth. Admittedly, his explanation backs up beast and his interpretation.

Man, he is dumb. Him and Burnett...Maybe, not a dumber sounding tandem in the NFL.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa