Porforis
7 years ago

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Slanted? I think my perception is one of the only ones here that isn't. Success? If the organizational goal is to win SB championships and this year we don't win one what have we done? Failed. It is not successful to fall short of your goal. If your goal is to win divisional championships only then mission accomplished. Be proud. Order your gear, TODAY! Your own definition of success for this team is not in consort with the organizations. My definition is. It's right in line. Anything short of hoisting the Lombardi is not a successful. Exciting? Sure. Overcoming adversity. Sure. Not bad for being 4-6 sure. It's all those things but it's also short of the goal so it's...FAILURE...ta da. Do you think Pats fans think it's a successful season when they win the division and go down in the playoffs. I assure you they don't. They have expectation based on past success and having Tom Brady and it's justified. Our fans have the expectation of making the playoffs and calling it a win for the season. I see it bragged about all the time... the streak is x many years. Who cares? I'll take ONE SB victory vs. 50 straight playoff appearances without one. Ask Vikings fans how it feels not ever winning a SB. They better understand my point than most of you do.

I'm going to go try and hit my goal of 25 reps of 225. If I put up 24, I'm going to party like it's 1999 and call it a big success??? LOL. No. I'm going to be very upset I fell short of my goal and I couldn't quite pump that last rep. Again, there is no way to spin that falling short of your goal is a success. We try and win every game. When we lose we fell short of our goal and it wasn't a success. A season is no different. Can you imagine spinning losing a game into it being a big success? Why are you doing it with a season? Oh, right...because football is hard and not hitting your goal is acceptable.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Seriously the guy is simply just a troll... he's unusual in that he trolls himself and his team, but still talks out of both sides of his mouth, say outlandish things one way, then when that's proven wrong... he's change his argument and say the outlandish thing the other way.

A few months ago, the Packers would be extremely lucky to get to 7-9... and only dreamer wearing rose colored glasses, who didn't live in reality could see the Packers with a winning season... which of course he was too big of a pussy to post on the form and so he only wrote it on Shout.

Now that once again he's proven wrong... he's saying winning record is horrible (after saying no way the Packers could do it). What bullshit. It's only horrible for those rooting against the Packers which clearly he has done... as he's been happy after Packers lost, and til this day, I've NEVER EVER seen a "Packers fan" bitch so much about a Bears loss (especially when it was the Packers beating the Bears... also I'm trying to remember... that game might of been for the division championship too). Hell, I know a number of Bears fans that bitched less, about how the Packers shouldn't of won the game, after that loss than he did.

At the end of the day, he's just here to say he's right... and since he takes both sides of an argument (no way the Packers will have a winning season / a winning season is a poor season for the Packers) he's going to say he's right... because he picks all options until it's the right one. And when you clearly catch him in a wrong argument, he changes subjects and the debate. Just like all the other trolls.
UserPostedImage
+5
blueleopard
7 years ago
Soft schedule and we went against more playoff teams than any other team in the playoffs. Try again.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
+1
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Seriously the guy is simply just a troll... he's unusual in that he trolls himself and his team, but still talks out of both sides of his mouth, say outlandish things one way, then when that's proven wrong... he's change his argument and say the outlandish thing the other way.

A few months ago, the Packers would be extremely lucky to get to 7-9... and only dreamer wearing rose colored glasses, who didn't live in reality could see the Packers with a winning season... which of course he was too big of a pussy to post on the form and so he only wrote it on Shout.

Now that once again he's proven wrong... he's saying winning record is horrible (after saying no way the Packers could do it). What bullshit. It's only horrible for those rooting against the Packers which clearly he has done... as he's been happy after Packers lost, and til this day, I've NEVER EVER seen a "Packers fan" bitch so much about a Bears loss (especially when it was the Packers beating the Bears... also I'm trying to remember... that game might of been for the division championship too). Hell, I know a number of Bears fans that bitched less, about how the Packers shouldn't of won the game, after that loss than he did.

At the end of the day, he's just here to say he's right... and since he takes both sides of an argument (no way the Packers will have a winning season / a winning season is a poor season for the Packers) he's going to say he's right... because he picks all options until it's the right one. And when you clearly catch him in a wrong argument, he changes subjects and the debate. Just like all the other trolls.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I stay out of forums in season...have been doing that for years. It's post season so I returned. I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6. I saw even the most hardened optimist lose hope then. I'm surprised Rodgers woke up. I'd like to know why? He slept walked for 18 months and all of a sudden started playing at 4-5? He did play well at Wash who is terrible on D, but he played well. Why all of a sudden? There is a reason. I was hoping 4-6 would continue for regime change purposes. It was a dream at 4-6 the way this D was playing to think we would reach 8-8. We over did it by 2. I thought 7-9, maybe. Yes, I was wrong but please don't act like I was alone in my thinking about this team back then. It was one of the few times what I thought actually meshed with the majority here.

I'm glad you spent a post telling me I'm a troll. Nothing makes me laugh more than the liberal use of that word. Do you know what it means or is it your safe word? I'm not a troll in any sense of the definition. I post what I truly believe. I am wrong just like all of you are. It's ironic that when I am wrong I'm just castigated but when I'm right it's ignored. It's further ignored in the very simple questions I ask that don't get answered. That is not a troll. You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll? Sure. Nothing I've typed since I returned from my season break has been outlandish or wrong. Talk around it all you'd like. Try taking it head on for once and see how you do.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


macbob
7 years ago
Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?
uffda udfa
7 years ago

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

Originally Posted by: macbob 



Type is best I can do. Aggressive, smart, well spoken, hungry, respect commanding, tough.
Mike McCarthy has run his course here. Dom has run his course. Are you really more concerned with who is next vs. taking the risk on fresh ideas? I'm not. There is no guarantee any coach, DC, is going to work out here regardless of pedigree. The thing is to try. You have no idea what plays will work or moves during a game but you have to try things to find out. I want to find out what's behind door #2.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


macbob
7 years ago
So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.
+1
beast
7 years ago

I post what I truly believe.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


No shit... unless we're using sarcasm, we all post what we truly believe. You always repeat this stupid line, like you're the only one... which is just arrogant .

I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


People were certain that the Packers were going to have a winning record you verbally attacked them, suggesting they'll never wake up to reality, that they're just dreamers who can't take off their rose color glasses and dismissed them. That has been your line year after year... so yes you have clearly been proven wrong year after year... as you're the one that's not in reality.

I get it, you're a perfectionist and always have try to improve things... but it fucking sucks that you're happy when the Packers lose and pissy&bitchy when the Packers win.... and feels like crap when you dump all over the team, and having your shout box hit and runs...


You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Threatened? WTF are you taking about... no one feels threatened... this is on the internet... no one feels threatened about going on their computers. I'm not threatened about questions I can't answer... if fact the only people I know would be threaten about that is 1) People that are about to take a test 2) Perfectionist which feel the need and desire to know the correct answers.

And I'm not even close perfectionist. But you are... so you're probably just projecting your own feelings out on that one.

Also, that would completely explain why you feel the need to ask answers like "Why did Aaron Rodgers make no Guarantees for the Playoffs?" and why you feel the need to come up with a theory for everything... and why you response to each and and every post in the past.

So thanks for the insight on yourself, and maybe you need to work on not feeling threatened by others. Also feeling threatened and being a perfectionist combo would explain a lot of your behavior on here... Sorry, I never thought about that before.
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

Originally Posted by: macbob 



Yup... with the current staff, you only have one option... them.

But if you fire them all... then you have an endless amount of options. And of course who ever is making this decision is clearly going to make the right choice... and they're going to find someone CLEARLY better than the Packers current staff, because they do it all the time... find coaches who help lead teams to playoffs 8 straight years in a row, it happens all the time.
UserPostedImage
+1
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Former Packers QB Brett Favre recently announced he was diagnosed with Parkinson's.
    Zero2Cool (23h) : The only QBs this season with 0 turnover-worthy plays according to PFF (minimum 30 dropbacks) Aaron Rodgers Malik Willis Justin Fields
    Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : @DavidBearmanPFN · 18h Vegas has watched Will Levis for 3 weeks and installed them as a 1-point favorite in Miami next week. Let that sink
    Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Martha, they did play much better with Dalton yesterday
    Zero2Cool (23-Sep) : Test results on Sam Darnold’s knee showed a knee bruise and no structural damage. He is not expected to miss any time.
    Martha Careful (23-Sep) : Not with Dalton apparently
    Mucky Tundra (23-Sep) : Not sure what to make of the NFC South so far this season (outside of the Panthers being a dumpster fire)
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : of course I say that and then they overturn that play that put them on the 49ers 2 yard line
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : *without
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Even with Nacua and Kupp out, Rams looking fiesty on offense
    Martha Careful (22-Sep) : Tim Boyle is playing for the Dolphins
    Martha Careful (22-Sep) : I love seeing Dallas lose
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : The Red Rifle is on fire in Las Vegas! 3 TDs in the first half!
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : @mattschneidman · 2m The fire alarm is going off inside the Packers locker room here in Nashville.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Sep) : Gonna need a drink after looking at my picks for the early games in Pick'em
    Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : James Jones. Y’all must not know, Dr. Mackenzie🤣 he was not going to let Jordan love play today.
    Zero2Cool (22-Sep) : Malik to start. Love inactive. Per report. Let's go!!
    buckeyepackfan (22-Sep) : I think J-10VE will be inactive, a little twist that could be put in is run a wildcat with Wicks at qb. Have him as emergency qb if needed.
    Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I think that's how it works.
    Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I'd go 3 QB regardless this game.
    Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : Clifford was elevated, not activated. He doesn't play, it doesn't count.
    hardrocker950 (21-Sep) : If Clifford is active, not likely to see Jordan play this weekend
    Mucky Tundra (21-Sep) : QB Sean Clifford and CB Robert Rochell elevated from the PS for the Titans game
    Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Love questionable. Morgan is out. Valentine is doubtful
    Martha Careful (20-Sep) : Rodgers and Lazard off to a very strong start
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Josh Jacobs. Limited.
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Can't find anything on Jacobs :(
    wpr (19-Sep) : Do you know if they gave Jacobs an extra day off? I hope so.
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : WR Jayden Reed (calf) and G Elgton Jenkins (illness/glute) returned after sitting out Wednesday.
    Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Packers are in pads and so is Jordan Love. Second straight day of practice for QB1.
    bboystyle (18-Sep) : If Love comes back, we win in a blow out
    Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Jordan Love just spoke with reporters and said he’s giving himself the week but hopeful to play Sunday against the Titans.
    Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Practicing is Jordan Love!
    Zero2Cool (18-Sep) : Packers are signing WR Cornelius Johnson to the Practice Squad per sources. Johnson was a 7th round pick this year.
    Zero2Cool (17-Sep) : Packers placed RB MarShawn Lloyd on injured reserve.
    Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Rams won’t have Cooper Kupp or Puka Nacua when they host the Packers in Week 5.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : Or is that the Rusty Red Rifle because of his age?
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : The Red Rifle Returns!
    Zero2Cool (16-Sep) : Panthers are benching former No. 1 overall pick Bryce Young and starting veteran Andy Dalton beginning this week.
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : bears still have slim chance here
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : and there's another one!
    Mucky Tundra (16-Sep) : oh crap macbob has the Texans K and he keeps hitting these long FGs
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Hope the Texans beat the brakes off the Bears
    Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : LaFleur: “I asked Malik why he didn’t throw it on that third down and he told me Josh threw up on the ball.”
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : i was wondering why it was just you, me, beast and macbob by the end
    Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Yeah it was weird today for some reason
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : Oh my, marvin harrison jr might be as good as he was billed out to be
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : and none of the chats on my phone are showing up on the desktop chat
    Mucky Tundra (15-Sep) : weird, i was on my phone for chat during the game but now on my desktop I look at chat and there's tons of chats i didn't see on my phone
    Zero2Cool (15-Sep) : Oh yeah, for sure. That's just not fair thoguh.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12h / GameDay Threads / wpr

    23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    21-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Sep / Random Babble / wpr

    18-Sep / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.