10 - 6 is dismal for Packers· Page 3

Porforis
Veteran Member

8 years ago

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

#22

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Slanted? I think my perception is one of the only ones here that isn't. Success? If the organizational goal is to win SB championships and this year we don't win one what have we done? Failed. It is not successful to fall short of your goal. If your goal is to win divisional championships only then mission accomplished. Be proud. Order your gear, TODAY! Your own definition of success for this team is not in consort with the organizations. My definition is. It's right in line. Anything short of hoisting the Lombardi is not a successful. Exciting? Sure. Overcoming adversity. Sure. Not bad for being 4-6 sure. It's all those things but it's also short of the goal so it's...FAILURE...ta da. Do you think Pats fans think it's a successful season when they win the division and go down in the playoffs. I assure you they don't. They have expectation based on past success and having Tom Brady and it's justified. Our fans have the expectation of making the playoffs and calling it a win for the season. I see it bragged about all the time... the streak is x many years. Who cares? I'll take ONE SB victory vs. 50 straight playoff appearances without one. Ask Vikings fans how it feels not ever winning a SB. They better understand my point than most of you do.

I'm going to go try and hit my goal of 25 reps of 225. If I put up 24, I'm going to party like it's 1999 and call it a big success??? LOL. No. I'm going to be very upset I fell short of my goal and I couldn't quite pump that last rep. Again, there is no way to spin that falling short of your goal is a success. We try and win every game. When we lose we fell short of our goal and it wasn't a success. A season is no different. Can you imagine spinning losing a game into it being a big success? Why are you doing it with a season? Oh, right...because football is hard and not hitting your goal is acceptable.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

#23

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

Originally Posted by: Porforis

Seriously the guy is simply just a troll... he's unusual in that he trolls himself and his team, but still talks out of both sides of his mouth, say outlandish things one way, then when that's proven wrong... he's change his argument and say the outlandish thing the other way.

A few months ago, the Packers would be extremely lucky to get to 7-9... and only dreamer wearing rose colored glasses, who didn't live in reality could see the Packers with a winning season... which of course he was too big of a pussy to post on the form and so he only wrote it on Shout.

Now that once again he's proven wrong... he's saying winning record is horrible (after saying no way the Packers could do it). What bullshit. It's only horrible for those rooting against the Packers which clearly he has done... as he's been happy after Packers lost, and til this day, I've NEVER EVER seen a "Packers fan" bitch so much about a Bears loss (especially when it was the Packers beating the Bears... also I'm trying to remember... that game might of been for the division championship too). Hell, I know a number of Bears fans that bitched less, about how the Packers shouldn't of won the game, after that loss than he did.

At the end of the day, he's just here to say he's right... and since he takes both sides of an argument (no way the Packers will have a winning season / a winning season is a poor season for the Packers) he's going to say he's right... because he picks all options until it's the right one. And when you clearly catch him in a wrong argument, he changes subjects and the debate. Just like all the other trolls.

blueleopard
Member

8 years ago

#24

Soft schedule and we went against more playoff teams than any other team in the playoffs. Try again.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

#25

Originally Posted by: beast

I stay out of forums in season...have been doing that for years. It's post season so I returned. I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6. I saw even the most hardened optimist lose hope then. I'm surprised Rodgers woke up. I'd like to know why? He slept walked for 18 months and all of a sudden started playing at 4-5? He did play well at Wash who is terrible on D, but he played well. Why all of a sudden? There is a reason. I was hoping 4-6 would continue for regime change purposes. It was a dream at 4-6 the way this D was playing to think we would reach 8-8. We over did it by 2. I thought 7-9, maybe. Yes, I was wrong but please don't act like I was alone in my thinking about this team back then. It was one of the few times what I thought actually meshed with the majority here.

I'm glad you spent a post telling me I'm a troll. Nothing makes me laugh more than the liberal use of that word. Do you know what it means or is it your safe word? I'm not a troll in any sense of the definition. I post what I truly believe. I am wrong just like all of you are. It's ironic that when I am wrong I'm just castigated but when I'm right it's ignored. It's further ignored in the very simple questions I ask that don't get answered. That is not a troll. You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll? Sure. Nothing I've typed since I returned from my season break has been outlandish or wrong. Talk around it all you'd like. Try taking it head on for once and see how you do.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

macbob
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#26

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

8 years ago

#27

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

Originally Posted by: macbob

Type is best I can do. Aggressive, smart, well spoken, hungry, respect commanding, tough.
Mike McCarthy has run his course here. Dom has run his course. Are you really more concerned with who is next vs. taking the risk on fresh ideas? I'm not. There is no guarantee any coach, DC, is going to work out here regardless of pedigree. The thing is to try. You have no idea what plays will work or moves during a game but you have to try things to find out. I want to find out what's behind door #2.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

macbob
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#28

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

#29

I post what I truly believe.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

No shit... unless we're using sarcasm, we all post what we truly believe. You always repeat this stupid line, like you're the only one... which is just arrogant .

I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

People were certain that the Packers were going to have a winning record you verbally attacked them, suggesting they'll never wake up to reality, that they're just dreamers who can't take off their rose color glasses and dismissed them. That has been your line year after year... so yes you have clearly been proven wrong year after year... as you're the one that's not in reality.

I get it, you're a perfectionist and always have try to improve things... but it fucking sucks that you're happy when the Packers lose and pissy&bitchy when the Packers win.... and feels like crap when you dump all over the team, and having your shout box hit and runs...

You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Threatened? WTF are you taking about... no one feels threatened... this is on the internet... no one feels threatened about going on their computers. I'm not threatened about questions I can't answer... if fact the only people I know would be threaten about that is 1) People that are about to take a test 2) Perfectionist which feel the need and desire to know the correct answers.

And I'm not even close perfectionist. But you are... so you're probably just projecting your own feelings out on that one.

Also, that would completely explain why you feel the need to ask answers like "Why did Aaron Rodgers make no Guarantees for the Playoffs?" and why you feel the need to come up with a theory for everything... and why you response to each and and every post in the past.

So thanks for the insight on yourself, and maybe you need to work on not feeling threatened by others. Also feeling threatened and being a perfectionist combo would explain a lot of your behavior on here... Sorry, I never thought about that before.

beast
Select Member

8 years ago

#30

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

Originally Posted by: macbob

Yup... with the current staff, you only have one option... them.

But if you fire them all... then you have an endless amount of options. And of course who ever is making this decision is clearly going to make the right choice... and they're going to find someone CLEARLY better than the Packers current staff, because they do it all the time... find coaches who help lead teams to playoffs 8 straight years in a row, it happens all the time.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (7h) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game

Zero2Cool (7h) : McCarthy let go or not extended??

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy

Zero2Cool (13h) : The winners page that is

Zero2Cool (13h) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol

beast (14h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.

beast (14h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3

Zero2Cool (14h) : congrats beast on 2024 !

Zero2Cool (14h) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)

Zero2Cool (15h) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact

Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.

Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout

Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career

Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : "The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."

Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Owner ... love it

Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Mayo was the guy they groomed for HC and one of the reasons they let Bill go.

Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Pats have the #4 pick, lots of cap space and Maye at QB; should fetch some attention

Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Well that didn't take long; Jerod Mayo out as Patriots HC

Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : I would expect it to be higher in favor of Eagles

Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Thst line seems...generous

Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : Eagles -3.5 over Packers in Wildcard Round

Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Did it though? Pokes beat the Commanders on the road with Cooper Rush previously

Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : That gives them their best chance

Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!

Mucky Tundra (4-Jan) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year

Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list

Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach

beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.

Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander

Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.

dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc

dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24