bozz_2006
15 years ago
I'm not downplaying Rosenfels. I'm being realistic. He's just not that good. I think he'll do OK, playing the same kind of game as Gus. But seriously, Rosenfels isn't that good.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
Sage is capable of carrying a team here and there for a game, Ferotte nor Jackson couldn't.

Lets not kid ourselves here, they will still be a run first club, but Sage gives them the ability to make the defense at least respect the pass and he has just enough mobility to force them to respect the pass rush lanes.

He isn't in the same class as Rodgers for instance.. but this is a respectable move.

For a 4th, to get a potential starting QB.. I think it speaks value. This is a team that is geared to win now.. Pat Williams, Birk, Hutch are all in that peak window or it is beginning to close... they needed to solve the QB issue.. this is a legitimate step towards that front.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
TengoJuego
15 years ago
*chuckles*
They must be really sold on him....



BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Formo
15 years ago

Sage is capable of carrying a team here and there for a game, Ferotte nor Jackson couldn't.

Lets not kid ourselves here, they will still be a run first club, but Sage gives them the ability to make the defense at least respect the pass and he has just enough mobility to force them to respect the pass rush lanes.

He isn't in the same class as Rodgers for instance.. but this is a respectable move.

For a 4th, to get a potential starting QB.. I think it speaks value. This is a team that is geared to win now.. Pat Williams, Birk, Hutch are all in that peak window or it is beginning to close... they needed to solve the QB issue.. this is a legitimate step towards that front.

"pack93z" wrote:



I really wish I could share your positivity for Sage, my friend. But I can't. Not until I see him play a few games, anyway.

If you ask me, he's a younger Frerotte. Which may not be a bad thing.. but at the same time, isn't a good thing.

I hate that people keep saying that the Vikings just need a serviceable QB. I disagree. They need a QB that can take the game over when needed. Because, lets face it, as much as Adrian wants and is able to take a game over, he's also the ONLY player that can/will/has done it, thus allowing defenses to key on him and only him. The Vikings need a QB that can move around a bit, is ACCURATE, and can hit the fade routes without having the WR slow down to get the rock.

Is that Sage? I have no idea, but from the sounds of it, it isn't.

Anyway, just my two cents.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
dfosterf
15 years ago
Personally, I hope they are "standing pat" with this acquisition. I really don't have anything negative to say about Sage Rosenfels, but at the same time he isn't exactly striking fear into the rest of the NFL. If I were the running the Vikings, I'd be thinking of him as a "fallback position" in the event I wasn't able to acquire a franchise-type quarterback. I reckon they could use a wide receiver or two, but you would think that the first, middle and last priority of that team would be getting a real difference maker at QB. They got him for essentially back-up $$$, and back-up compensation draft-pick-wise, so I'm not going to be surprised if that's how he winds up...a back-up QB.


If Sage is the key component of the Vikes master plan...

That spells relief to Packer fans, imo.

I say he probably is not.
Formo
15 years ago
Just to strike a little more worry into you cheesehead Packer backers, the Vikings were apparently looking to trade for Cutler, since he and the Broncos are 'supposedly' fighting. lol

Cutler, YES.

Sage, NO.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Cheesey
15 years ago


I asume they're grooming Booty right now.

"Rockmolder" wrote:


Wasn't that what they did on the "boat" a few years ago???? :thumbleft: LOLOLOL!!!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (12m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (21m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (33m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.