Bigbyfan
15 years ago

Sounds like Ted could have had Canty in today before his Seahawks visit but would not agree to financial terms...

"PackOne" wrote:



Where did u hear that?
blank
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Sounds like Ted could have had Canty in today before his Seahawks visit but would not agree to financial terms...

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



Where did u hear that?

"PackOne" wrote:



I'm very interested in this aswell. For me, that shows that Ted Thompson doesn't think that we're as play-off ready as I think we are... or that he just has alot of faith in our current roster.

I seriously hope they'll sign him, just to be excited about something. 😛
PackOne
15 years ago
"If Canty is not signed, he will head to Seattle. Blank gave the Packers a chance to jump ahead of Seattle on Canty's tour schedule but the team would not commit to the contract parameters Blank is looking for."

If you hunt around, you can find more.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
15 years ago
Maybe we should sign that Colin Cole guy lol. Now you people wonder why FAs don't want to come to GB.

BTW good find LT
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Rios39
15 years ago
Packers have jumped out front.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/2009/03/breaking-packers-making-push-for-canty/ 

The Packers are currently talking to Cantys agent and at the moment, have put more money on the table then the New York Giants.
blank
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Maybe we should sign that Colin Cole guy lol. Now you people wonder why FAs don't want to come to GB.

BTW good find LT

"dhazer" wrote:



You mean that 2nd string DT who really isn't that great and can just aswell become a 3rd string in the 3-4? I'm not to sold on him, especially not if he wants alot of money.

As for your post, Rios. I'm really thrilled about this. We really need to fix at least one position through FA. Imo, we need a direct impact player on the D-line and in this scheme, Canty is that player. I'm convinced that Poppinga will be an ok rusher in the 3-4, although I seem to be the only one, looking at the poll. I'd like to see Raji, but in this case, I think we'll get an OLB.

Still, I don't mind that much, I want to see the team win and get alot of sacks. This seems to be a move in the right direction.
dhazer
15 years ago
Rock it was a joke about Cole lol sorry. I will back off the Ted Thompson bashing if we get Canty because i want a new jersey to buy lol.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
porky88
15 years ago
Conflicting reports between the JS and the NFP, but at least it's all but confirmed that the Packers are talking to his agent and that alone is something new for this early in free agency.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Excellent input guys and the links are great!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (5m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (5m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (12m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (13m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (34m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.