Packers not interested in moving back from No. 9· Page 2

dfosterf
Veteran Member

15 years ago

Well Wils I wasnt sure how it would work out but still would be nice lol. To be honest i have no clue on who we should take at #9, I'm thinking Raji would be best but who knows. We have alot of doubts right now on who can play LB and who can play DE. So why draft more players we are not sure on.

"longtimefan" wrote:

Why not wait and see what happens in free agency? b4 saying they need to get so and so in the draft

something may surprise ya ;)

"dhazer" wrote:

Yes, this.

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#12

Moving back just got alot more interesting. Just saw a clip on NFL.com where Wyche pointed out that the Titans might go for Raji to replace Haynesworth now that he's a Redskin. Pure speculation, but still.

I think the Packers would be in a premier position for a trade here. Trade for a first this year, one next year and a second this year or something like that. We'd cash in bigtime, especially since I don't see the Titans repeating what they did last year.

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#13

Whew.. that's a pretty far jump back. I'd feel pretty leery about that. Pick #9 is valued at 1350. Their 1st and 2nd combined is 904, and I don't know if you could talk them into giving up their 1st next year too. That's a MONUMENTAL draft day trade. They'd have to really want someone at 9.

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#14

We had the small discussion about Crabtree falling to us but it could be a possibility. TJ is heading to seattle for a visit. If they sign him they will pass on Crabtree and go o-line

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

dfosterf
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#15

I am going to say again what I have been saying since the season ended. If we can find a trade partner, a trade-back out of that 9 hole is what we should do. Looking at the talent pool available in the early third of the first round, contrasted with the latter portions and coupled with the depth through the third, especially as contrasted to the aforementioned talent pool, I am even more convinced that this would be the ideal scenario. Our switch/ quasi-switch to a 3-4 makes a two for one make even more sense. I still want linemen. Not DB's. Not WR's. Not TE's. NOT LINEBACKERS...we have potentially like 50 of those, listening to everyone on this board and elsewhere...so help me God, we get a linebacker, HE BETTER BE ALL THAT, plus a bag of chips AND a coke.

L I N E M E N.

Lima India November Echo Mike Echo November

Interior-type A

Defensive AND OFFENSIVE. I hope we draft TEN of 'em, or some such.

imo

:icon_smile:

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#16

"dfosterf" wrote:

Is someone forgetting about the opposite side of AK?

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#17

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

That was what I was going at. I mean, they have a void at DT now and Raji would be th player to fill that up with Haynesworth leaving... especially since they have a small window of oppertunity with Collins at QB.

I don't think that would be that weird of a scenario. It would mean though that we wouldn't get inmediate results and that will piss alot of people off, which is not something that Ted Thompson can use atm, I think.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#18

GoPack...

Pay me little heed, my young friend. This is just my annual overcooked "lineman opinion".

It is but a counter-balance to all the skill-position advocates grinding the free agency and draft grist mill, especially exacerbated by the knowledge that 90% of the staff running the show for the Green Bay Pack[strike]oflineback[/strike]ers are former ones...

I usually calm down just before the draft.

:thumbleft:

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#19

As far as moving back. Did anyone expect Ted Thompson to walk up to a podium and yell out. Hey all, I want to trade back. If everybody knew that he was looking to move back the value would drop. Never tip your hand.

For the trade back with the Titans Idea. Not bad, that is a big move back, and I think the value is pretty close. When looking at getting picks the next year in trades, I believe the strategy is to move the pick down 1 round to find its value. So a 2nd next year would be worth the same as that pick in round 3 this year.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

AJistheHawk50
Registered

15 years ago

#20

We had the small discussion about Crabtree falling to us but it could be a possibility. TJ is heading to seattle for a visit. If they sign him they will pass on Crabtree and go o-line

"dhazer" wrote:

um i do not think that he will sign with them.. i think that he has a much better option with... dare i say it... the vikings

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS