Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
At 1:01 1Q, 3rd and 7 at 8. Nelson's first TD :

#1 read was Monty running an out 1 yard in front of sticks covered by LB was wide open; Rodgers looked, had throwing lane even though one was not required and pumped and 100% inexplicably did not throw the ball.

Read #1B: if CB covers Monty; Hit uncovered Adams in left corner of end zone.

Read #2: Nelson ran a curl in at GL-he was covered by other LB and DT Ngata dropping back.

Read#3a/3b Cook and Cobb ran parallel deep-curl-ins; Cook was covered Cobb was open by full step.

After not throwing to Monty, Rodgers glanced at Jordy and never got to 3rd read as rush spooked him. Folks, it was a 3 man rush. Again another well designed well coached complicated play [Like they ALL are] and only one player didn’t do his job.

At 13:04 1Q, 2nd and 5 dump off to Lacy in right flat definitely nets the first and he could have beast-moded it for a 10-15 yard gain. But Rodgers didn’t finish progressions and play-grounded it and hit Cobb for 33.

At 10:50 2nd Q, 3rd and 3. For those who say McCarthy don’t call enough slants:

Read #1, was a slant to Cobb in slot on left. Rodgers shifted Starks left to cover the blitz. He knew the blitz would come from left, this would leave the slant throw open for the first and if Cobb broke a tackle, it’s a TD. As it turned out Cobb’s defender fell and it would have been a TD. Instead Rodgers made a very difficult throw to Jordy in left corner. BTW, this throw was unpissingly believably great; It was PERFECT. And I bet Jordy catches that ball if CB Slay didn’t subtly block Jordy’s right hand from getting to the ball. But, not playing within the offense cost us 4 points.

Ideally Rodgers only goes sandlot after going through progressions or OL breaks down. McCarthy’s unstoppable offensive scheme [If executed] becomes one of the best offenses in history, when Rodgers skills at extending plays are added to and not done at the expense of the execution of the offense. Of course, if he continues to fear getting hit, it wont matter, he’s gotta go.

Haven’t gone through the 2nd half; but it seems Rodgers played within the offense on the other 15 1st half throws, so this is MAJOR improvement. But, is the Chip now off his shoulder and what happens when the chip does comes off? Going even 3 plays rogue is a disaster. It exposes Rodgers to injury, it exposes the O to turnovers and it pisses off the lockerrom, especially when Lord Rodgers’ Trust demands his receivers execute the game plan and then he doesn’t do it.
gbguy20
8 years ago
Nice work. In before Smokey calls you longwinded and disabled.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
beast
8 years ago

At 10:50 2nd Q, 3rd and 3. For those who say McCarthy don’t call enough slants:

Read #1, was a slant to Cobb in slot on left. Rodgers shifted Starks left to cover the blitz. He knew the blitz would come from left, this would leave the slant throw open for the first and if Cobb broke a tackle, it’s a TD. As it turned out Cobb’s defender fell and it would have been a TD. Instead Rodgers made a very difficult throw to Jordy in left corner. BTW, this throw was unpissingly believably great; It was PERFECT. And I bet Jordy catches that ball if CB Slay didn’t subtly block Jordy’s right hand from getting to the ball. But, not playing within the offense cost us 4 points.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



That's the one that upset me, because I felt like Rodgers rushed it when he didn't need to... Nelson wasn't uncovered and had Rodgers held onto it and not predetermined it... then it would be been a long forward hand off to Cobb as good high school QBs should of been able to hit Cobb when he guy was on the ground.

UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
8 years ago
It's already off to better efficiency than last season and I'm willing to give it more time. I will say that this offensive line is shaping up to be one of the best we've had in the Aaron Rodgers era, so I hope he trusts them more as the season goes on, and I hope they continue to play together without any major injuries like last year.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Fan Shout
wpr (14h) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
7h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.