If Burnett is at LB... then who's at SS?
I've been a fan of the physical DB at LB idea for YEARS!!!!... but you have to have enough talented DB to run it... so if Burnett is at LB, does that mean Hyde or Banjo are at SS? ... I like the idea of Burnett at coverage LB... but I'm not sure about Hyde or Banjo at SS.
But really using a S as a LB is not new for the Packers, they just don't run it that often. Mainly when they the combo of playing against heavy run offenses, and the Packers have depth at DB.
I remember one game when the Packers went to their normal 2-4 nickel package (which has a 4-2 look and feel), they then surprised me by dropping Collins down to OLB giving it a 4-3 look with three CBs and a single deep S.
I can't remember it as well... but I think they also did something creative in the 9-0, almost no offense game against the Rex Ryan Jets.
Also when they had a healthy SS Richardson, they'd use him as a run stuffing coverage DB/LB at times.
But I'm just not sure the Packers have the Safety depth to do it this year... unless they're thinking about the 3 CB and 1 S look like they ran with Collins. Or if they plan to drop Randall back to Safety at times or something.