Shit Cheesey, you're so busted up, you wouldn't even make it to your weapon, which is my point entirely. Talk is cheap. Fact of the matter is, people like you are paranoid and to make matters worse, the news sources you choose to frequent use that paranoia to make you even bigger imbeciles than you already are.

If it makes you feel good to own guns, then own them. I really don't give a shit one way or another. What I do care about are unreasonable people who think owning AR-15's is a part of their Constitutional rights. They have taken a lot of latitude with their interpretation of the second amendment. Those are assault weapons for the military, and until NRA nimrods give an inch, the reasonable people in this country are going to be pissed about this issue.

Taking assault weapons off the streets and from the citizens of a violent country is what reasonable people want. It is not an infringement of your rights in any way. If you can't stop that burgler with a revolver, shotgun, or rifle; are you really competent to use an AR-15. LOL

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

lol

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 

Insightful.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Hey, at least I have contributed some substance to this thread, though. That's a critical difference here.

Moreover, there's no reason to add any more fuel to this fire. It's quickly turning Back Alley.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 

I just thought the timing of it was too good to not acknowledge. 😁

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Shit Cheesey, you're so busted up, you wouldn't even make it to your weapon, which is my point entirely. Talk is cheap. Fact of the matter is, people like you are paranoid and to make matters worse, the news sources you choose to frequent use that paranoia to make you even bigger imbeciles than you already are.

If it makes you feel good to own guns, then own them. I really don't give a shit one way or another. What I do care about are unreasonable people who think owning AR-15's is a part of their Constitutional rights. They have taken a lot of latitude with their interpretation of the second amendment. Those are assault weapons for the military, and until NRA nimrods give an inch, the reasonable people in this country are going to be pissed about this issue.

Taking assault weapons off the streets and from the citizens of a violent country is what reasonable people want. It is not an infringement of your rights in any way. If you can't stop that burgler with a revolver, shotgun, or rifle; are you really competent to use an AR-15. LOL

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

Nothing will change as long as you don't go after the real problem, the evil people!

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

There is no latitude taken with the 2nd except by idiots who want to restrict it. Shall not be infringed. Pretty self explanatory. As for the AR-15. It is NOT a military Weapon. But guess what, Remington 870 is, Remington 700 was. It is a semi-automatic weapon, nothing more or less, just looks scary.

They are used for hunting, they are used for targets, they are used for competition and they are used for fun far more than the very rare in comparison amount of times they are used in mass killings. The paranoid people again are the idiots who want to "ban" them thinking that if they make one more law the bad guys will start following them. I personally don't own an "AR" style gun, probably won't because I prioritize my money elsewhere, and the ammo gets expensive for the amount of fun. But they are a blast to shoot. Once again we see the paranoid people wasting no tragedy in attempt to grab what guns they can from law abiding citizens. Today the argument is being on the terror watch list, well guess what, the guy who shot up Orlando Wasn't on the list so he still would have been able to buy the guns.

As for this CA ruling. There are 49 dead people in Orlando who finally found their reason to be armed. Unfortunately found out too late.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins