DakotaT
8 years ago

There's absolutely not enough time to monitor every player's diet especially in the offseason. I'm sure they do what they can.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



Maybe just start with the fat ones.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
8 years ago
I don't know how much they can actually keep an eye on every player in the off season.

I hope Lacy learned from this and will keep himself in shape from now on. He has too much talent too waste it .
UserPostedImage
Laser Gunns
8 years ago
I may be in the minority, but I really like Lacy (when in shape), and would much rather the Pack get him going then relive the Alex Green/Vernand Morency/Deshawn Wynn/Cedric Benson/Dajuan Harris/James Starks days.

That Alabama RB this year looks nice though.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
nerdmann
8 years ago

Interesting take... other than the fact the due to the CBA, teams can only have very limited contact with the players in the offseason and even in season.

Do you schedule the team plans/drills around the majority of the team who correctly do their job of staying in shape? Or do you focus in on the slackers who fail to stay in shape, while the guys that did their job in the first place just wait around and do nothing new?

Originally Posted by: beast 



That's true, there is limited MANDATORY practices. However, players are free to show up and work out as I understand it. Not only that, they're free to get advice and workout programs from their training staff.

Unless you know, they think P90X is better. 😂
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
8 years ago

That's true, there is limited MANDATORY practices. However, players are free to show up and work out as I understand it. Not only that, they're free to get advice and workout programs from their training staff.

Unless you know, they think P90X is better. 😂

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



And that's where your logic completely falls apart... because the other players were able to do it... and Lacy failed... that's on Lacy, not the training staff.

And Lacy probably knows, that personal instructors are better for him, because he's proven that he's too fucking lazy to stay in shape without them... again, that's on Lacy, not the staff. Hell that might be more Alabama staff than Packers staff, as another former Bama RB has pointed out , that Bama treats their players like boys, "having everything like at Alabama where it was so structured", to adjusting to suddenly being treated like a man "in the NFL, [where] everything’s on your own". Bama might talented players, but you also might have to watch for them getting lazy once they get to the pros.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
8 years ago

And that's where your logic completely falls apart... because the other players were able to do it... and Lacy failed... that's on Lacy, not the training staff.

And Lacy probably knows, that personal instructors are better for him, because he's proven that he's too fucking lazy to stay in shape without them... again, that's on Lacy, not the staff. Hell that might be more Alabama staff than Packers staff, as another former Bama RB has pointed out , that Bama treats their players like boys, "having everything like at Alabama where it was so structured", to adjusting to suddenly being treated like a man "in the NFL, [where] everything’s on your own". Bama might talented players, but you also might have to watch for them getting lazy once they get to the pros.

Originally Posted by: beast 



What does using the informercial guy instead of professional athletic trainers have to do with laziness? Are you saying the Packers are unwilling to work with Eddie? Because I'll bet they are.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
8 years ago

What does using the informercial guy instead of professional athletic trainers have to do with laziness? Are you saying the Packers are unwilling to work with Eddie? Because I'll bet they are.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



The Packers probably have 1 professional athletic trainer for every 4 players at best... for a lazy person that doesn't work well enough, as they need a better ratio... so Lacy smartly went out and got a better ratio, 4 professional athletic trainers for 1 player...

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
8 years ago

I may be in the minority, but I really like Lacy (when in shape), and would much rather the Pack get him going then relive the Alex Green/Vernand Morency/Deshawn Wynn/Cedric Benson/Dajuan Harris/James Starks days.

That Alabama RB this year looks nice though.

Originally Posted by: Laser Gunns 



We all like Lacy when he's in shape, but isn't that what this thread is about.

The people in this forum need to know the difference between criticism in hatred. I think 90% of the posters in this forum think they are the same thing.
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
8 years ago

The Packers probably have 1 professional athletic trainer for every 4 players at best... for a lazy person that doesn't work well enough, as they need a better ratio... so Lacy smartly went out and got a better ratio, 4 professional athletic trainers for 1 player...

UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: beast 



Well Tony just came out with a new fitness routine, so this is good press for him as well.

https://www.beachbody.com/product/fitness_programs/22-minute-hard-corps-workout.do?ch=flx&code=FLX_110_22HC 
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
When do we start being concerned about Eddie Lacy being too thin?

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (16h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (17h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.