Think about what you said about Bob McSPINN (Barfarn's best ever)... So, are the other writers of JSO not under the same directive? It's pretty obvious that reading here, there, or any other Packers forum or blog, with the exception of Michael Rodney's glorious work, that koolaid is generating more clicks than anything else. DAVANTE ADAMS CONFIDENT DESPITE DISMAL SEASON. Oh, boy! Let's read this ear tickling piece that will convince me opposite of what I know to be true that he sucks. Please, someone tell me that he's really going to be good. Click, click, click... McGinn's articles aren't for the koolaiders ... look at the reaction here to his work. He's the finest most objective journalist at any major newspaper that covers the Packers/Green Bay scene. Always has been. Ask Rob Demovsky how well it goes over trying to be Bob McGinn?
Bob has been churning out excellent work for years based on his many contacts and access to sources other guys in Packers media could only dream of having access to. Your personal bias leads you to reject his work.
Oh, Bob isn't infallible...the cited piece about the roster being good enough to win without Aaron is a bad bad moment. However, that has to do strictly with OPINION. What analyst hasn't predicted something that looked stupid? Watch these game predictions of these great NFL players and coaches and you'll see how abysmal they are at accurately predicting anything. So, Bob has a wrong OPINION and that is used to invalidate his SOURCES? No. That makes no sense. You've read and loved his sources for years when it comes to our draft picks and players. Now, when he has sources that tell you something you don't enjoy you rip him and bring up an OPINION that he held that was proven false. Rich. It's unbelievable the real SPIN that goes on around here...it ain't from Bob.
Mirror Mirror on the wall...
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa