What is A.Rodgers worth?· Page 3

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

8 years ago

Hey!

I cope w/ Packer tragedy with passive aggressive humor rage and exhibiting some of the advanced poetry techniques I learned in 2nd grade. No need to bring my other issues into this.😂

You of course are burning incense around the Rodgers Buddha and using a slight wave of your hand to direct the wafting smoke toward your nostrils. I don't agree, but respect that.

But you didn't answer my question!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn

If you would pay attention, I'm often critical of Rodgers, especially with him not throwing to what in the NFL is considered an Open WR. I also an critical of all players, coaches and Ted when called for.

What I am not is irrational in doing so.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

DakotaT
Select Member

8 years ago

#22

Either take your meds, or have your dosage checked.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

How is it I call bigots Fascists and get a month timeout, but you get to call people mentally unstable without going in the corner? I have always had a disgust for the inconsistent rules at PH.

Porforis
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#23

How is it I call bigots Fascists and get a month timeout, but you get to call people mentally unstable without going in the corner? I have always had a disgust for the inconsistent rules at PH.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

You could start by reporting it to be sure either myself or Kevin see the message and thus can take care of it 😛

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#24

You didn't answer the question. So, I'll just assume that...yes...you will be happy with making the playoffs year after year until Rodgers is done and no more SB victories.

Points 1 and 2? Thanks for those. I wasn't aware. Had no idea.

You don't want to go for it and risk not being in the playoffs and losing year after year for the possibility of actually winning it all. We're just different.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Obviously you weren't aware of the 2 points I made, because you are ready to trade away The Packers franchise qb.

I'm going to need more information on how trading qb1 away is going to get The Packers back to The Super Bowl.

You're the self ordained football genius of this forum.

Convince me.

Looking forward to the next 10 pages of this thread.

Should be quite entertaining

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#25

Again, this is why people "hyena" you.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I understand. If you write something and then get asked about it and can't answer back I guess that's the approach to take. I'm not badgering, rude, or condescending...I'm asking SIMPLE fair questions to things people are alleging. If you can't answer, then don't type in the first place. That isn't so hard.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#26

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Who did we trade away a couple of years prior before winning the SB in 2010? I think that was a 1st ballot hall of famer. I'm all but certain you were moaning and depressed that we did the wrong thing. I can't even imagine how you were after 6-10.

That was needed to get to the show. That is something you don't seem to grasp.

You would've freaked had you been a Bucs fan when Dungy got canned. NECESSARY.

This team has failed 5 years in a row. SOMETHING has to change. Doesn't have to be Rodgers but it has to be something SIGNIFICANT. Taking a step back to go forward is more than worth it but I understand how "fun" it is to win divisions and lose in the playoffs. It's exhilarating.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

earthquake
Member

8 years ago

#27

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You ask obviously loaded, worthless questions and then act "confused" when nobody answers.

If you asked me "Are you upset that your wife is a whore?" I wouldn't dignify the question with a response. Much of your "questions" are along the same theme, designed to make the person who answers look a fool no matter what they say.

I will answer your loaded question though:

Happiness is not binary, it's not a simple matter of being happy or not. There are varying levels.

I would be extremely happy if the Packers won the superbowl every year.

I would be very happy, but a bit less so if they won one or two in the next 10 years.

I would be perfectly content if the packers got to the playoffs and had a chance to win the SB consistently over the next 10 years, even if ultimately, they failed to do so. It may shock you, but the reason for this is simple, there is more to my life than a sports team, so I will not throw a fit or wallow in self-pity if they disappoint me. If this outcome makes you a very unhappy person I can only feel sorry for you.

I would be disappointed if the Packers started sucking like the Lions, Bears or Vikings, even in this case I would some how, some way, manage to go on living a perfectly normal life.

blank

cheeseheads123
Member

8 years ago

#28

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You act like we have been getting blown out in the playoffs the last couple of years. This isn't a sport where it is a best of 3-5-7 game series. This is win or your out. So this means one unlucky bounce can be the difference between going to the Superbowl or going home. Cmon, as Packers fans we all know this.

nerdmann
Premier Member

8 years ago

#29

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Again.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

8 years ago

#30

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Yes, they're loaded in the sense I already know the answer, but it's ironic that the things that are posted are contrary to the known answer. That begs the question why are people posting things not consistent with reality or their personal belief? I think that's fair for me to ask. Nerd posts inaccurate info on this site multiple times daily. Should he be allowed to do so without being questioned about his ludicrous assertions? I don't think so.

I wasn't bent out of shape when the Packers lost at Arizona. I was surprised they were even playing that game. It was house money to me.

However, as a fan, it's pointless to watch knowing your team is not going to win a SB. If I knew when I started being a fan of this team at age 12 that it would never ever win a championship, I wouldn't have bothered to watch them in the first place. The idea they can and will win is why I watch. I would not watch if I knew for the next 10 they'd win the division and lose out in the playoffs. That is why I'm vocal about what I say...I don't want to watch that for 10 years while you're fine with it.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (49m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (50m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (2h) : Packers will get in

beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS